Advanced Search Results

Darjeeling Commercial Co. Ltd. Vs. Pandam Tea Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 439 and 443; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 17, 69 and 95; ;Indian Limitiation Act, 1908 - Section 19; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 18

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas814(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Jayanta Mitter, Adv.;T.K. Basu, Adv.

Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application for the winding up of the company under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. This petition has a chequered career as the...

M/S. Sona Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. West Bengal Small Industrie ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

WP No.36 of 2014 GA No.272 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.SONA PROMOTERS PVT.LTD.& ANR. Versus WEST BENGAL SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.& ORS.Appearance Mr.Debasish Kundu, Adv.Mr.R.N.Ghosh, Adv.…Petitioners...

Priya Gupta Vs. General Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226, 311, 310 and 311(2); Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 1(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60; Railway Establishment Code - Rule 143, 148, 148(3) and 148(4); Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 49

Reported in : AIR1959All643

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Khare, Adv.

ORDERJ. Sahai, J. 1. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Electrical Foreman in 1944 in the erstwhile Bengal and Assam Railway. After the partition of the country the Bengal and Assam Railway was renamed as Assam...

Amal Deb Vs. Biswanath Mitter and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1984Cal85

Advocate for Appellant : Amalesh Mitter, Adv. for ;Rathindra Narayan Deb, Adv.

M.M. Dutt, J.1. This is an application praying for the stay of the operation of the order dt April' 19, 1983 of R. N. Pyne,, J., whereby the learned Judge confirmed the sale by the trustee...

Hindusthan Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Probodh Kumar Mitter and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 131; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 36

Reported in : AIR1980Cal292

Advocate for Appellant : Bachawat, Adv.

Ramendra Mohan Datta, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment and decree dated 19th April, 1971 passed by Roy Chowdhury, J. in a suit for damages for a sum of Rs. 68, 598/-.2. The...

Limited Vs. M/S Mining and Construction Equipment

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

GA No.3215 of 2012 AP No.126 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED -VersusM/S MINING & CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT PVT.LTD.& ANR. Appearance: Mr.R.N.Ghosh, Adv...for the...

Srei Equipment Finance Limited Vs. Classic Super Construction and ors

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service Tax

1 ORDER SHEET GA No.454 of 2014 APOT No.72 of 2014 AP No.279 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED Versus CLASSIC SUPER CONSTRUCTION & ORS...

State Vs. Prakash Chandra Agarwalla

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 173, 251A(2) and 369

Reported in : AIR1970Ori171; 1970CriLJ1254

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Ramdas, Adv.

ORDERB.K. Patra, J.1. The opposite party Prakash Chandra Agarwalla holds a licence under the Orissa Foodgrains Dealers' Licensing Order, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Order) and was dealing in wheat and wheat-products. The Inspector, Vigilance,...

Premium Agro Exports Limited Vs. the Jute Corporation of India Limited ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 28(3) and 34; ;Essential Commodities Act, 1958 - Section 3; ;Jute and Jute Textile Control Order, 2000; ;Constitution of India - Articles 142 and 226

Advocate for Appellant : Debasish Kundu, ;R.N. Ghosh and ;S. Chowdhury, Advs.

Sanjib Banerjee, J.1. The parties agree that an order on the principal matter, AP No. 674 of 2009, will govern all the other matters. Indeed, the reasons given by the common arbitrator is recorded in the...

S.K. Bhagat and Co. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 36(1) and 36(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 26

Reported in : (2005)195CTR(Cal)444,[2005]275ITR464(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Khaitan and ;R.N. Ghosh, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The question :The question involved in this case is very short, viz., whether the allowance of claim of Rs. 1,84,375 as bad debt out of the dues shown at Rs. 6,61,723 in the...