Advanced Search Results

Spartek Emerging Opportunities (Mauritius) Ltd. Vs. Argus Cosmetics Li ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 443; Companies (Court) Rules, 1999 - Rule 9; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 47(2); Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC927; (2002)3MLJ364

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari, Adv.

ORDERC. Nagappan, J.1. In this application, the applicant has sought for revival and restoration of Company Petition No. 76 of 1997 to file, as per the order, dated 23.11.2001.2. The applicant filed Company Petition No.76 of...

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. Rajarajeswari Agency and S.K. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 24, 28, 28(3), 31, 31(3), 34 and 34(2); Indian Contract Act; Transfer of Property Act; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ525

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari, Adv.

R. Banumathi, J.1. Aggrieved against the Order of the learned Single Judge in O.P.No. 295 of 2000 (dated 31.10.2003), setting aside the award passed by the Arbitrator, Bharath Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) has preferred this Appeal.2....

C.N. Paramasivam and E.M.C. Palaniappan Vs. Sunrise Plaza, Represented ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 134; ;Income Tax Act, 1961; ;Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Section 29; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 84, 85 and 86; ;Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 285D, 285E and 285G; ;Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962; ;Recovery of Tax Rules

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari, Adv.

ORDERC. Nagappan, J.1. The petitioners have sought for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 28.2.2007 passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai in MA. No. 90 of 2006.2. The facts...

Technology Development Board by Its Constitutued Attorney, Itcot Consu ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 434(1), 439 and 442; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas690(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari, Adv.

P. Jyothimani, J.1. This company petition is filed under Sections 433(e), (f), 434(1)(a) and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, for winding up of the respondent-company and consequently for appointing the official liquidator as liquidator of...

Beml Ltd. Vs. Beml Midwest Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB Chennai

Subject : Company

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Naganand, S. Sriranga, Gupta and Ravi, R. Murari, Ms. Kavitha Kannan, T.K. Seshadri and N. Sakthivel for the Appearing Parties.

1. The petitioner has invoked the equitable jurisdiction of the Company Law Board under sections 397, 398, 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) with a view to bringing to an end...

G. Govindaraj Vs. Venture Graphics (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 192, 193, 194, 195, 397, 397(1), 397(2), 398, 399, 402, 403 and 406; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 141 - Order 41, Rules 2, 20 and 30

Reported in : [2008]147CompCas56(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari, Adv.

Chitra Venkataraman, J.1. This appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 raises the following questions of law:(1) Whether the Company Law Board was right in concluding that the signature of the balance sheet...

V. Sridhar Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. by Its Branch Manager and An ...

Court : DRAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : M/s. R. Murari, M/s. Y. Thyagarajan.

1. This Appeal is filed challenging the impugned Order passed by the DRT, Visakhapatnam, in Appeal No.1/2004 in RP No.193/2002 in OA-820/1999 on 23.4.2007. 2. The Appellant filed an Application before the DRT to refund Rs.8,35,650/-...

P.V. Premnath Vs. Tvs Motor Co. Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari for the Petitioner. R. Veera Raghavan for the Respondent.

1. This company petition has been filed under section 111(4)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”) seeking directions against M/s. TVS Motor Company Limited (“the Company”) to (i) rectify the register of members by incorporating...

Palanisamy and anr. Vs. Milka Nutrients P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 397, 398 and 403

Reported in : [2008]144CompCas619(Mad); (2008)6MLJ1081

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murari, Adv.

R. Banumathi, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the order/interim order dated January 11, 2008, passed by the Additional Principal Bench, Company Law Board, Chennai, in C.P. No. 5 of 2008.2. The dispute is in...

Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corpn Vs. Fenner India Ltd

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 09/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR APPLICATION.3735 OF2013BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPN VS FENNER INDIA LTD FOR PETITIONER : ARUNKARTHIK FOR RESPONDENT : PREETIMOHAN ORDER: R.SUDHAKAR, J.APPLICATION NOS....