Advanced Search Results

Hanmanth S/O Bhimrao SaThe Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 11, 12(2), 18, 23, 23(1), 23(1A), 23(2) and 28; Land Acquisition Act, 1897 - Sections 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR691; 2006(6)MhLj249

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde and ;M.S. Patil, Advs.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. The agricultural lands, situated at village Makni, taluka Omerga, district Osmanabad, were acquired by the State for public purpose i.e. of Lower Terna Project. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,...

Balasaheb Kushaba Kadam and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 56, 59, 59(1), 59(2) and 62(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR565; (1991)93BOMLR988

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Kanade, Adv., ;Mustafa Momin, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 365 and 366, R.M. Borde, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 364, 369 and 370, ;K.B. Bhise, Adv. in W.P. No. 388

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. All these petitions raise common questions of fact and law are, therefore, decided and disposed by this common judgment.2. Criminal Writ Petition No. 332 of 1990 filed by Balasaheb Kushaba Kadam challenges order...

Vithal Vishwambharrao Deshmukh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 28

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR1021; 2004(1)MhLj600

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde, Adv. in First Appeal Nos. 60, 61, 62, 64, 106, 107 and 108 of 1988 and ;V.K. Jaju, A.G.P. in First Appeal Nos. 99, 100, 101 and 102 of 1992

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the land-owners (original claimants) and Mr. V. K. Jaju, learned A.G.P. for the State of Maharashtra2. The group of 11 appeals arises out of common judgment...

Bhiva S/O Tukaram Tarkase Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-b and 498-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113-B

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR498; 2000(1)MhLj593

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde, Adv.

ORDERPer J.A. Patil, J.1. The deceased Alkabai was married to the appellant on 25-5-1986. She committed suicide on 13-12-1990 by consuming some insecticide. It is the prosecution case that the appellant and his mother, Chandrabhagabai (accused...

Rakhamabai W/O Madhavrao Misal and ors. Vs. Asruba Dajiba Wanve and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 14

Reported in : 1984(1)BomCR383

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde, Adv. for ;A.B. Naik, Adv.

D.B. Deshpande, J. 1. The only question in this second appeal is whether the plaintiffs have a right of pre-emption in respect of the suit land. Both the courts below have held that the plaintiffs have...

Rama S/O Kondiba Khade Vs. Sk. Sakir S/O Sk. Kachru and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140; Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 - Rule 260(3)

Reported in : 2004ACJ1370; 2004(1)MhLj971

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde

D. S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, learned Counsel, for respondent No. 2.2. Admit.With consent of the...

Rama Vs. Sk. Sakir and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2005)ACC508

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.M. Borde

D.S. Zoting, J.1. Heard Mr. R.M. Borde, learned Counsel for the appellant. Mr. C.V. Thombre, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. S.K. Naikwade, the learned Counsel for respondent No. 2.2. Admit. With consent of...

Bhausaheb Alias Babu Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 3, 6, 11, 13, 14, 164, 164(3), 313 and 428

Reported in : 1997CriLJ467

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde and ;Mrs. Ashwini A. Joshi, Advs.

1. Appellant-original accused has preferred the present Criminal Appeal against the judgment and sentence passed by Shri J. A. Shaikh, first Additional Session Judge, Beed, in S.C. No. 168/1995, convicting the appellant under Section 304(1) of...

Ashok S/O. Vasantrao Aradhye Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR196

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde, Adv.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. Shri R.M. Borde, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that as per the directions given by this Court, the petitioner has tried to join at Beed but since an incumbent had already resumed...

Pankuwarbai Wd/O Dalpatrao Mutha and Others Vs. Rameshchandra S/O Dalp ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372; Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 46 - Article 11

Reported in : 1998(4)BomCR477; (1998)1BOMLR171; 1998(1)MhLj118

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Borde, Adv.

ORDERB.B. Vagyani, J.1. Heard Shri R.M. Borde, learned Advocate for the petitioners and Shri Chaudhary for the respondents.2. With the consent of the learned Counsel of the parties, the matter has been heard and finally disposed...