Advanced Search Results

Pokhran Investments Private Vs. Dadha Estates Private Limited,

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)132CompCas324

1. This petition is filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') alleging that the affairs of M/s Dadha Estates Private Limited ('the Company') are being conducted in a manner oppressive...

A.R. Lakshmi and ors. Vs. Sri Krishna Tiles and Potteries

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2008)144CompCas716

1. This is an application made under Regulation 26(2) of the Company Law Board Regulations. 1991 ("the Regulations") on behalf of the petitioners to the main petition invoking the jurisdiction of Sections 397 & 398 of...

S. Varadarajan Vs. Venkateswara Solvent Extraction (P.) Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(1), 53(3), 53(4), 169, 169(6), 172, 173, 173(2), 189, 262, 265, 284, 397, 398, 399(3) and 408

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas693(Mad); (1992)IIMLJ130

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. K. Mylsamy

Lakshmanan, J.1. The first petitioner, S. Varadarajan, in the main company petition is the applicant in Company Application No. 602 of 1992. He filed the above application for an order of interim injunction restraining the second...

K.C. Maran and anr. Vs. M. Jayaramaiah and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(28-A) and 66F(1-D); Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 294-C

Reported in : AIR1982Mad335; (1982)1MLJ336

Advocate for Appellant : Adv. General, ;S.R.L. Narayanan, ;R. Balasubrahmanian, ;C. Selvaraju and ;M. Palani, Advs.

ORDER1. Both these revisions raise an important question of law as to the meaning of S. 68F (I-D) together with its proviso of the Motor Vehicles Act The respondent who is common in both these revisions...

Rajendran and ors. Vs. State Rep. by Acp (Law and Order)

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 113A

Reported in : II(2001)DMC495

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Narayanan, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. The appellants challenging the conviction and sentence imposed upon them for the offence under Section 498-A, I.P.C. directing them to undergo R.1. for 3 years have filed this appeal.2. Originally, they were...

S.B. Vohra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ39

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kumar, Senior Adv. and; K.B. Soni, Adv

Devinder Gupta, J.1. Directions are sought in this petition against the respondents to forthwith revise the existing pay scales for the post of Assistant Registrars and posts higher thereto as per the recommendations made by Chief...