Advanced Search Results

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Ram Piara Comrade

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1106

H.R. Sodhi, J.1. This judgment will dispose of two Criminal Original Nos. 257 and 259 of 1971 in which notices had been issued to Comrade Ram Piara respondent, ex-M.L.A., to show cause why he should) not...

G.T.C. Industries Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT737TriDel

1. M/s. G.T.C. Industries Ltd., Bombay (hereinafter referred to as 'GTC'), have filed the present application for rectification of mistake (ROM) with reference to Tribunal's Order No. 287 to 291/96 D dated 19-4-1996. The ROM application...

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Bharat Bhushan Agarwal

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2000)(115)ELT812TriDel

1. Applications for condonation of delay of approximately 13 months have been filed by the Revenue whose contention is that since the appeal against the order passed in respect of one of the respondents namely, M/s....

Sudhir Sharma Vs. The Commissioner of Customs

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak

$~28 to 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 09.2014 Pronounced on:27. 02.2015 + CUS.A.A.29/2011, C.M. APPL.11198/2011 SUDHIR SHARMA ....Appellant versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ..... Respondent + CUS.A.A.32/2011, C.M....

M.P. Tobacco Ltd. Vs. Cce, Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

1. In this stay application, the applicants have prayed for waiver of pre-deposit of the amount of penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs imposed on them by the Commissioner under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules...

M/S. Arcee Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

1. Shri R.L. Lamba, Advocate appearing for M/s. Arcee Industry submits that even before the show cause notice was issued, the appellants have voluntarily deposited a duty of Rs. 1,45,000/- and refers to para 6 of...

Shri Suraj Bhan and Another Vs. Shri Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba and Othe ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab High Court Rules & Orders - Rule VI; Punjab Courts Act - Sections 35(3); Constitution of India - Articles 9, 10, 14 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 2; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 241; Government of India (Adptation of Indian Laws) Order, 1937; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24 ; Delhi High Court Act, 1966 - Sections 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLI, Rules 4 and 33

Reported in : 91(2001)DLT702

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv.,; Mr. N.L. Bareja,; Mr. R.L. Lamba

ORDERB.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. Instant Letters Patent Appeals No.30/1999, 31/99 & 64/99 arise out of a common judgment dated 9th of November, 1998 of the learned Single Judge in Civil Writs No.1939 of 1988 and 1152/1988 filed...

Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba and Others Vs. the Administrator of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIAD(Delhi)813; 1999(48)DRJ186

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.L. Bareja and; Mr. R.L. Lamba, Advs

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1.These two writ petitions involve a common question. thereforee, they are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The petitioner in CWP. 1939/88 was appointed as Lower Division Clerk on the 1st of October,...

S.K. Baharal and ors. Vs. the Administrator of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab High Court Rules - Rules I, II and VI; Constitution of India - Article 235

Reported in : 1993(27)DRJ58

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Lamba,; Mukul Rohatagi and; B.S. Mehta, Advs

P.N. Nag, J.(1) In this petition the petitioners, who are working in the subordinate courts of Delhi, have challenged the Administrative Instructions dated 22nd September, 1978 (Annexure- P.3) issued by the High Court of Delhi and...

Chokha Nand Madan Vs. Asian Exhibitors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : ILR1989Delhi295

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Lamba and; Harish Malhotra, Advs

Mahesh Chandra, J.(1) (ORAL)-THIS Civil Revision is directed against order dated 9th December, 1988 of Sub-Judge) 1st class whereby application of decree-holder-petitioner filed under Order 21 Rule 41 Civil Procedure Code for directions to judgment-debtor to...