Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Premier Proteins Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-29-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN147(MP)
R.L. Jain and Ku. V. Mandlik for the Applicant. G.M. Chafekar and D.S. Kale for the Respondent.
ORDERSapre, J. This is an Income Tax Reference made under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of revenue (CIT) by the Tribunal in R.A. No. 12/Ind/97 arising out of an order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Malwa Vanaspati and Chemical Co. Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-23-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]142TAXMAN158(MP)
R.L. Jain, for the Revenue S.C. Goyal, for the Assessee.
ORDERThe decision rendered in this Reference application shall also govern the disposal of other two references being CIT v. Vippy Solvex Producis Ltd (IT Reference No. 69 of 1997) and CIT v. Vippy Solvex Products Ltd....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFerro Concrete Construction (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-03-2005
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN885(MP)
S.C. Bagadia & D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee. R.L. Jain & Ku. V. Mandlik, for the Revenue.
ORDERSapre, J. This is an Income-Tax Reference made at the instance of assessee under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act in R.A. Nos. 48,49 and 50/Ind./97 which arise out of ITA Nos. 902 and 221/Ind./95...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok M. Patel Vs. Union of India
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-27-2006
Direct Taxation
[2006]153TAXMAN518(MP)
S.C. Bagadia & D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee R.L. Jain & Ku. Veena Mandlik, for the Revenue
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.The decision rendered in this appeal shall govern. disposal of other connected appeal being I.T.A. No. 13 of 2003, because both these appeals involve identical point and secondly, both the appeals are filed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Alpine Solvex Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-25-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN67(MP)
R.L. Jain and Ku. V. Mandlik, for the Appellant G.M. Chafekar and D.S. Kale, for the Respondent.
ORDERSapre, J. This is an appeal filed by revenue (CIT) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against an order, dated 26-2-1999, passed by the Tribunal (ITAT) in I.T.A. No. 1026/Ind./97.2. It may be mentioned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhatia Motor Stores Vs. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-14-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)200CTR(MP)385; [2006]152TAXMAN89(MP)
S.C. Bagadia with J.K. Jain, for the Revenue R.L. Jain with Ku. V Mandlik, for the Assessee
By The CourtThis is an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').2. The relevant facts for purpose of disposal of this appeal are that the appellant filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. State Bank of Indore Bench
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-04-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN348(MP)
R.L. Jain with Ku. V. Mandlik, for the Revenue R.T. Thanewala, for the Assessee
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.This is an income-tax reference made under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of revenue (CIT) in RA Nos. 154 & 155/Ind/1997 arising out of an order dated 5-8-1997, passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of Indore Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-03-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)198CTR(MP)617
R.T. Thanevala, for the Assessee R.L. Jain & Ku. V. Mandlik, for the Revenue.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J. This is an appeal, filed by an assessee under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against an order dated 10-5-1999, passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal herein after referred to called Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSardar Machhi Singh Vs. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-28-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN8(MP)
S.K. Jain, for Assessee R.L. Jain with Ku. Mandlik, for the Revenue
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern disposal of other connected appeals being ITA Nos. 73, 75, 76 and 78 of 1999 because all these appeals involve identical point and secondly, they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. K.D. Wires (P) Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-17-2005
Direct Taxation
[2006]150TAXMAN244(MP)
R.L. Jain and Ku. Veena Mandlik for the Revenue S.C. Bagadia and D. Chhabra for the Assessee
ORDER1. This is an appeal filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Income-Tax) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order dated 1-6-1999 passed by the Tribunal in I.T.A. No. 811 /IND /95. This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »