Advanced Search Results
Pioneer Tools and Appliances (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Oct-15-1982
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4
1989(23)LC120(Bombay); 1989(42)ELT384(Bom)
Mr. Andhyarujina
1. The first petitioners manufacture, in the name of M/s. Precision Die-Cast Industries, grinders-cum-mixers and pay excise duty in respect thereof. In paragraph 3 of the petition it is alleged that the first petitioners have appointed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Radio and Electronics Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Another
Mumbai
Oct-26-1982
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Section4
1983LC77D(Bombay); 1983(12)ELT214(Bom)
1. The petition challenges an order of the second respondent dated 1st July, 1981 disallowing the deduction claimed by the petitioners for post-manufacturing expenses in arriving at the assessable value of their products for the purposes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakti Insulated Wires Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...
Mumbai
Feb-04-1983
Excise
1989(20)LC231(Bombay)
Bharucha, J.1. This notice of motion seeks an unusual relief. Having regard to the more unusual stand taken by the respondents, I propose to grant it.2. On 3rd October 1981 my brother Pendse delivered a judgment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
National Textile Corporation Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-22-1975
Property
Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 4(2); Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4 and 6
AIR1976Bom28; (1975)77BOMLR352
R.L. Dalal and ;B.N. Shambhu, Advs.
Tulzapurkar, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by National Textile Corporation (a Company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 which has been allowed to be substituted in place of the original appellant who was The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. M/S. Ghanekar Construction ...
Mumbai
Feb-08-1996
Arbitration
1996(3)BomCR697; (1996)98BOMLR325
Shri R.L. Dalal and ;Sh. A.J. Bhor, Advs.
ORDERS.M. Jhunjunuwala, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to have the Award dated 7th December, 1989 filed in this court and numbered as 'Award No. 27 of 1990' set aside. 2. The petitioners are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corpo ...
Mumbai
Feb-06-1992
Commercial
Petroleum Act, 1934 - Sections 4 and 31; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 394; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 254 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 8; Petroleum Rules, 1979 - Sections 2 and 8; Fire Service Act, 1950
AIR1993Bom54; (1992)94BOMLR194
R.L. Dalal, ;N.U. Masai and ;M.B. Rao, Advs.
ORDERKapadia, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay seeking to challenge the judgment of the learned single Judge dated 27th June, 1988 in the above Writ Petition No. 2472...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and ors. Vs. Monopol Chemical ...
Mumbai
Mar-14-1988
Other Taxes
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 128, 139 and 192(1)
AIR1988Bom217; 1988(3)BomCR197
R.L. Dalal and;R. Rehman, Advs.
Jahagirdar, J.1. This appeal has been placed before the Full Bench by the learned Chief Justice on the recommendation made by a Division Bench (Pendse and Kotwal, JJ.), which was inclined to differ from the view...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Shroff and C ...
Mumbai
Nov-25-1987
Other Taxes
Central Provinces and Berar Sales of Motor Spirit and Lubricants Taxation Act, 1939; Maharashtra Import and Export of Liquor Rules, 1963; Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Storage in Bond) Rules, 1964 - Rule 2(9); Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 2(14), 105 and 106; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 143, 192, 192(1) and 195(1B); Octroi Rules, 1965 - Rules 2, 2(2), 2(5), 2(7) and 10; Punjab Municipal Account Code, 1930 - Rule V.17(3); Partnership Act; Bond Rules
AIR1988Bom334; (1987)89BOMLR612
K.K. Singhvi,;R.L. Dalal and Rashida Rehman, Advs., i/b., M.V. Shetty, Adv.
Pendse, J. 1. The respondents are a firm registered under the provisions of the Partnership Act and carry on business of dealing in liquors, wines and spirits. The respondents import Indian made foreign liquor into Greater...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Sealol Hindustan Ltd.
Mumbai
Mar-30-1990
Customs
1991(53)ELT295(Bom)
Shri R.L. Dalal,;Shri S.M. Shah and;Shri K.C. Sidhwa, Advs.
Sugla, J.1. The impugned order dated 20th June, 1990 of the learned Single Judge is on the basis of an earlier judgment dated 22/23 March, 1988 of this Court in the petitioners' own case. The said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Special Land Acquisition Officer (i), Bombay and anr. Vs. the Muni ...
Mumbai
Jul-06-1987
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 18, 20, 21, 39, 50 and 50(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Constitution of India - Article 141; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 18 and 18(1)
AIR1988Bom9; 1988(2)BomCR588
R.L. Dalal and;D.M. Trivedi, Advs.
ORDER1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, who are the applicants, have taken out this Chamber Summons dt. 17th June 1987 for being added as a party to this reference under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »