Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r kumar · Page 1 of about 649 results (0.574 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 20 2002

Cit Vs. Tirupur Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Finance Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]127TAXMAN392(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ravikumar, for the Revenue R. Kumar and T.N. Seetharaman, for the Assessee

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.The question of law referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for our consideration under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 in relation to the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year 1980-81 reads...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2001

Jamil Ahmad and ors. Vs. 5th Addl. Distt. Judge, Moradabad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2001

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 5 and 10(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171

Reported in : AIR2001SC3067; JT2001(8)SC444; 2001(7)SCALE143; (2001)8SCC599

Advocate for Appellant : E.R. Kumar,; Mrs. Musharraf Chowdhary and; P.H. Parekh, A

ORDER1. This appeal is from the order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated November 24, 1978 disposing of the Writ Petition No. 1054/78 filed by the appellants in terms of the order in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2006

Excise Commissioner and anr. Vs. Mysore Sales International Ltd. and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-13-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(Kar)505

Advocate for Appellant : P. G. Chengappa & E.R. Indrakumar, for the Revenue K.R. Kumar & Sarangan with Dr. R.B. Krishna, for the Assessees

V. Gopala Gowda, J.The appellants Mysore Sales International Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSIL' in short) and the Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSCL' in short) and the State Government represented by its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 05 2008

Sita Ram and ors. Vs. Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training Institute

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 6N; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2008SC1955; [2008(117)FLR1191]; JT2008(3)SC622; (2008)IILLJ688SC; (2008)4MLJ105(SC); 2008(4)SCALE77; (2008)5SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2256; AIR2008SC1955; 2008(5)SCC75; 2008-II-LLJ-688; 2008LabIC1778; 2008(2)Supreme376

Advocate for Appellant : R.R. Kumar and; Bharat Sangal, Advs

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent is a research institute. It imparts training to farmers for facilitating improved agricultural production. For imparting training, fees is not charged from the trainees. The trainees are also provided free...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2002

Siddharth Media Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Andhra Prabha Pvt. Ltd.) ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-18-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(Mad)450; [2003]260ITR286(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Kumar, Adv. for ;T.N. Seetharaman and ;Hema Sampath, Advs.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal passed in I. T. A. No. 1673 (Mad) of 1989 dated March 26, 2002.2. The assessee is a partner in a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2010

Chaitanya Prakash and anr. Vs. H. Omkarappa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Hindustan Photo Films Service Rules; Company Rules

Reported in : 2010(1)SCALE386; (2010)2SCC623; 2010(2)LC590(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : E.R. Kumar,; Ranjeeta Rohtagi,; Somandri Gour and;

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The issue that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether the impugned order passed by the appellants against the respondent terminating his service during the period of probation was an order of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2000

Mr. Ar. Educational Society Vs. Cit

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]253ITR589(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Kumar, for the Assessee O. Anandram, for the revenue

R. Jayasimha Babu, J.Counsel for the revenue contends that no referable question of law arises, as in his submission, the findings recorded by the Tribunal and the authorities below are findings of fact, and a binding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 03 1998

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Indian Express (Madurai) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-03-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Mad)456

Advocate for Appellant : C.V. Ralan, for the Revenue R. Kumar for T. N. Seetharaman & Hema Sampath, for the Assessee

ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.For the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74, the following two questions of law had been referred at the instance of the revenue :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2002

Smt. P.S. Vasantha Vs. Cit

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]124TAXMAN578(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Kumar, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.The question which falls for consideration in this case is as under :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is liable to be assessed in the sum of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2002

Abirami theatres (P) Ltd. Vs. Iac

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]124TAXMAN351(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Kumar and T.N. Seetharaman, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue

ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J. In pursuance of the directions of this court, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law in relation to the assessment year 1983-84 :'Whether, on the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial