Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. Tirupur Sri Meenakshi Sundareswarar Finance Ltd.
Chennai
Nov-20-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN392(Mad)
T. Ravikumar, for the Revenue R. Kumar and T.N. Seetharaman, for the Assessee
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.The question of law referred by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for our consideration under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 in relation to the assessment of the assessee for the assessment year 1980-81 reads...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamil Ahmad and ors. Vs. 5th Addl. Distt. Judge, Moradabad and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-09-2001
PropertyFamily
Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 5 and 10(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 169 and 171
AIR2001SC3067; JT2001(8)SC444; 2001(7)SCALE143; (2001)8SCC599
E.R. Kumar,; Mrs. Musharraf Chowdhary and; P.H. Parekh, A
ORDER1. This appeal is from the order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated November 24, 1978 disposing of the Writ Petition No. 1054/78 filed by the appellants in terms of the order in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExcise Commissioner and anr. Vs. Mysore Sales International Ltd. and o ...
Karnataka
Mar-13-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)203CTR(Kar)505
P. G. Chengappa & E.R. Indrakumar, for the Revenue K.R. Kumar & Sarangan with Dr. R.B. Krishna, for the Assessees
V. Gopala Gowda, J.The appellants Mysore Sales International Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSIL' in short) and the Mysore Sugar Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'MSCL' in short) and the State Government represented by its...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sita Ram and ors. Vs. Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training Institute
Supreme Court of India
Mar-05-2008
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 6N; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25G; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2008SC1955; [2008(117)FLR1191]; JT2008(3)SC622; (2008)IILLJ688SC; (2008)4MLJ105(SC); 2008(4)SCALE77; (2008)5SCC75; 2008AIRSCW2256; AIR2008SC1955; 2008(5)SCC75; 2008-II-LLJ-688; 2008LabIC1778; 2008(2)Supreme376
R.R. Kumar and; Bharat Sangal, Advs
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent is a research institute. It imparts training to farmers for facilitating improved agricultural production. For imparting training, fees is not charged from the trainees. The trainees are also provided free...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiddharth Media Holdings Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Andhra Prabha Pvt. Ltd.) ...
Chennai
Dec-18-2002
Direct Taxation
(2003)183CTR(Mad)450; [2003]260ITR286(Mad)
R. Kumar, Adv. for ;T.N. Seetharaman and ;Hema Sampath, Advs.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal passed in I. T. A. No. 1673 (Mad) of 1989 dated March 26, 2002.2. The assessee is a partner in a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChaitanya Prakash and anr. Vs. H. Omkarappa
Supreme Court of India
Jan-12-2010
Service
Hindustan Photo Films Service Rules; Company Rules
2010(1)SCALE386; (2010)2SCC623; 2010(2)LC590(SC)
E.R. Kumar,; Ranjeeta Rohtagi,; Somandri Gour and;
Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The issue that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether the impugned order passed by the appellants against the respondent terminating his service during the period of probation was an order of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Ar. Educational Society Vs. Cit
Chennai
Dec-04-2000
Direct Taxation
[2002]253ITR589(Mad)
R. Kumar, for the Assessee O. Anandram, for the revenue
R. Jayasimha Babu, J.Counsel for the revenue contends that no referable question of law arises, as in his submission, the findings recorded by the Tribunal and the authorities below are findings of fact, and a binding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Indian Express (Madurai) Ltd.
Chennai
Mar-03-1998
Direct Taxation
(2001)165CTR(Mad)456
C.V. Ralan, for the Revenue R. Kumar for T. N. Seetharaman & Hema Sampath, for the Assessee
ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.For the assessment years 1972-73 and 1973-74, the following two questions of law had been referred at the instance of the revenue :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. P.S. Vasantha Vs. Cit
Chennai
Jul-09-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN578(Mad)
R. Kumar, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.The question which falls for consideration in this case is as under :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is liable to be assessed in the sum of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbirami theatres (P) Ltd. Vs. Iac
Chennai
Jul-09-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN351(Mad)
R. Kumar and T.N. Seetharaman, for the Assessee T.C.A. Ramanujam, for the Revenue
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J. In pursuance of the directions of this court, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law in relation to the assessment year 1983-84 :'Whether, on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »