Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r krishnaswami · Page 1 of about 293 results (0.087 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 24 1992

Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli Vs. M/S. Vinay Engineering, Sole ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-24-1992

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 15, 19 and 20; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 21, 31(1), 33 and 41; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR1992Mad332

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnaswami, Adv.

ORDER1. Original Petition No. 547 of 1991 was filed by the first respondent herein M/s. Vinay Engineering under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act to direct the second respondent (the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 1997

State Bank of Mysore Vs. Lakshmi Construction P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-14-1997

Subject : BankingContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 171

Reported in : [2001]103CompCas258(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

N. Arumugam, J. 1. The suit is for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 15,73,113.19 with further interest at 18 per cent. per annum on the said amount which may accrue from the date of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2001

Parveen Travels (P.) Ltd. Vs. Visteon Automative Systems India (P.) Lt ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-2001

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14, 14(1) and 41

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas630(Mad); [2003]44SCL564(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnaswami, Adv.

K. Sampath, J.1. This is an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their men, agents, etc., from cancelling the agreement with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 05 2003

Dr. Shantha Vs. Sharada

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 63

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ188

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnaswamy, Adv. for ;C. Ramesh, Adv.

N. Dhinakar, J. 1. P. Sundaramurthy died on 6.1.1981 leaving behind him a legal battle to be fought by his two daughters, Shantha and Saradha, over a Will dated 6.12.1980 and also a son by name...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1998

Shriram Chits and Investments (P)ltd., T. Nagar Vs. M. Krishnan and Ot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-11-1998

Subject : CommercialLimitation

Acts : Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 65; Limitation Act, 1963 -- Sections 5, 12, 14 and 64; Chits Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 65, 66 and 67; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR2000Mad78; 1999(1)CTC238

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnaswami, Adv.

ORDERJudgement pronounced by E. Padmanabhan, J.1. In this writ appeal notice of motion was ordered on 24.6.1998. The respondents have entered appearance. With the consent of the counsel appearing for either side the writ appeal itself...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1952

T. Vinayaka Mudaliar Vs. Mindala Pottiamma

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-16-1952

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1) and 3

Reported in : AIR1953Mad432; (1952)2MLJ774

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Krishnaswami, Adv. for ;T.K. Rangaswami, Adv.

Mack, J.1. This appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act raises for determination an interesting point which does not appear to have been specifically decided in any reported case. The appellant is one Vinayaka Mudaliar who claims...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2010

The State Bank of India Vs. Vivek Garg and Others

Court : Sikkim

Decided on : May-24-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-11-2008 passed by the District Judge, East and North Sikkim, at Gangtok, in Money Suit No.3 of 2005, by which the suit filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1989

S. Amudha Vs. Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-1989

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1991)1MLJ137

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prakash

Mohan, Officiating C.J.1. The short tacts leading to the writ appeal are as follows: The appellant herein in a B.Sc., Chemistry graduate of the University of Madras and she secured second class in the annual examination....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2023

K.S.Sabu, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-25-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 3RD BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15717 OF 2020 PETITIONERS:1 K.S.SABU, AGED 66 YEARS S/O. G....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1989

S. Amudha Vs. Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : (1991)IILLJ234Mad; (1991)IMLJ137

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Prakash

1. The short facts leading to the writ appeal are as follows :The appellant herein is a B. Sc., Chemistry graduate of the University of Madras and she secured Second class in the annual examination. She...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial