Advanced Search Results
Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli Vs. M/S. Vinay Engineering, Sole ...
Chennai
Mar-24-1992
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 15, 19 and 20; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2), 21, 31(1), 33 and 41; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 28
AIR1992Mad332
R. Krishnaswami, Adv.
ORDER1. Original Petition No. 547 of 1991 was filed by the first respondent herein M/s. Vinay Engineering under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act to direct the second respondent (the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Bank of Mysore Vs. Lakshmi Construction P. Ltd. and ors.
Chennai
Jun-14-1997
BankingContract
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 171
[2001]103CompCas258(Mad)
R. Krishnaswamy, Adv.
N. Arumugam, J. 1. The suit is for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 15,73,113.19 with further interest at 18 per cent. per annum on the said amount which may accrue from the date of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskParveen Travels (P.) Ltd. Vs. Visteon Automative Systems India (P.) Lt ...
Chennai
Dec-03-2001
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14, 14(1) and 41
[2002]112CompCas630(Mad); [2003]44SCL564(Mad)
R. Krishnaswami, Adv.
K. Sampath, J.1. This is an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their men, agents, etc., from cancelling the agreement with the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Shantha Vs. Sharada
Chennai
Nov-05-2003
Family
Indian Succession Act - Sections 63
(2004)1MLJ188
R. Krishnaswamy, Adv. for ;C. Ramesh, Adv.
N. Dhinakar, J. 1. P. Sundaramurthy died on 6.1.1981 leaving behind him a legal battle to be fought by his two daughters, Shantha and Saradha, over a Will dated 6.12.1980 and also a son by name...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShriram Chits and Investments (P)ltd., T. Nagar Vs. M. Krishnan and Ot ...
Chennai
Dec-11-1998
CommercialLimitation
Chit Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 65; Limitation Act, 1963 -- Sections 5, 12, 14 and 64; Chits Funds Act, 1982 -- Sections 65, 66 and 67; Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, 1961
AIR2000Mad78; 1999(1)CTC238
Mr. R. Krishnaswami, Adv.
ORDERJudgement pronounced by E. Padmanabhan, J.1. In this writ appeal notice of motion was ordered on 24.6.1998. The respondents have entered appearance. With the consent of the counsel appearing for either side the writ appeal itself...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Vinayaka Mudaliar Vs. Mindala Pottiamma
Chennai
Sep-16-1952
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1) and 3
AIR1953Mad432; (1952)2MLJ774
K.R. Krishnaswami, Adv. for ;T.K. Rangaswami, Adv.
Mack, J.1. This appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act raises for determination an interesting point which does not appear to have been specifically decided in any reported case. The appellant is one Vinayaka Mudaliar who claims...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Bank of India Vs. Vivek Garg and Others
Sikkim
May-24-2010
Land Acquisition
(1.) This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-11-2008 passed by the District Judge, East and North Sikkim, at Gangtok, in Money Suit No.3 of 2005, by which the suit filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Amudha Vs. Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation
Chennai
Aug-29-1989
Constitution
(1991)1MLJ137
Mr. Prakash
Mohan, Officiating C.J.1. The short tacts leading to the writ appeal are as follows: The appellant herein in a B.Sc., Chemistry graduate of the University of Madras and she secured second class in the annual examination....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S.Sabu, vs Union of India,
Kerala
Aug-25-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 3RD BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15717 OF 2020 PETITIONERS:1 K.S.SABU, AGED 66 YEARS S/O. G....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Amudha Vs. Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation
Chennai
Aug-29-1989
Labour and Industrial
Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6
(1991)IILLJ234Mad; (1991)IMLJ137
Mr. Prakash
1. The short facts leading to the writ appeal are as follows :The appellant herein is a B. Sc., Chemistry graduate of the University of Madras and she secured Second class in the annual examination. She...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »