Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r krishnamoorthy · Page 1 of about 486 results (0.228 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 06 2012

Arulmigu Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam Vs. the Hindu Religious and Cha ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-06-2012

Subject : Family

Acts : Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 6(20), 6(18), 46(iii), 55, 27, 116(2), 86; Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious Institutions (Officers and Servants) Service Rules, 1964 - Rules 14, 5-A; Constitution of India - Section 226

Advocate for Appellant : Shri.R.Krishnamoorthy, Adv.

This Writ Petition is a third round of litigation between the priests and the employees on the one hand and Arulmigu Shri Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam represented by its Hereditary Trustee on the other hand over the fixation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2012

P.M.L.Kalyanasundaram. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-04-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code(IPC) - Sections 465, 466, 468, 471, 473, 417, 419, 120-B(1); Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 482

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy, Adv

Prayer:-Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to quash the Criminal Case in C.C.No. 32 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, at Tindivanam, insofar as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1998

The Managing Director, Hindustan Photo Films Co., Ltd. Indu Nagar, Oot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-14-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India -- Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 47, Rule 1; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 -- Sections 2 and 25F

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC30

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior counsel for ;M/s King and Partridge, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggrieved against the common order passed by this Court in W.Ps.Nos. 5820 of 1994 etc., batch dated 12.9.1997, Managing Director and General Manager of Hindustan Photo Films Company Limited, Ootacamund have filed the above review...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 03 2008

M. Haridass and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 7(3), 14, 15, 18, 21, 22, 23A(1), 25, 25(2) and 31; Special Economic Zone Act, 2005 - Sections 2; Tamil Nadu Special Economic Zones (Special Provision) Act, 2005; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 5A(2), 11, 16, 17(1) and 55(1); Town and Country Planning Act; Right to Information Act (RTI); Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 51; Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Lands for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978; National Highways Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108A; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952; West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948; West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 50

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ1174

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Ayyadurai, Adv. in W.P. No. 16922/07

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. In all these cases the common issue involved relates to the challenge of G.O.Ms. No. 139, Industries (MIG-2) Department, dated 03.11.2006 and the consequential acquisition proceedings initiated in terms of the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2009

M. StalIn Arockiaraj, Correspondent, Sahayamatha and St. Michael Teach ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-01-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 6 and 7; Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Rules, 1979 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ1504

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnamoorthi, Sr. Counsel for T.P. Kathiravan, Adv.

D. Murugesan, J.1. An extent of 0.92.0 hectares of punja land in village Survey No. 46/4C in Somanathamangalam village, Sivagangai Taluk was notified under Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2004

Consortium of Professional Arts and Science Colleges and ors. Vs. Perm ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-13-2004

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 19(1), 19(1), 26, 30, 141 and 226

Reported in : 2004(3)CTC721

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnamoorthy, Sr. Adv. for V. Ayyathurai, Adv. in W.P. No. 16034/2004, ;Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. for R.S. Jeevarathinam, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 16068/2004, ;Nalini Chidambram, Sr. Adv. for L.S. Hasan F

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. The Order of the Court was as follows :The petitioners in all these writ petitions have challenged the proceedings in SFPC/PC/00014 dated 1.6.2004 of the Permanent Committee constituted to ensure the fair conduct...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2012

Arulmigu Vaithianathaswamy Devasthanam Rep. by Its Hereditary Trustee ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-10-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel for S. Sounthar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, S. Kandasamy, Special Government Pleader (HR& CE Dept.), R4, S. Duraisamy, R5, T.L. Rammohan, Senior Counsel for A.V. Arun, Advocates.

(Prayers: W.P.No.13918 of 2012:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari fied Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent relating to his proceeding in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 1998

M/S. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd., Rep. by Its Authorised Person K. Moh ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-18-1998

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 -- Sections 138 and 141; Constitution of India -- Article 21; Essential Commodities Act -- Sections 10; Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1994 -- Sections 47 (1) (2)

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD(Cri)794; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)403; [1998]94CompCas879(Mad); 1998(2)CTC372

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel

ORDER1. The petitioner is the complainant in C.C. No.3063 of 1997 on the file of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Madras. The respondent as described before this Court is the accused in that case. That was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 1998

Bharathidasan University, Palkalai Perur, Tiruchirapalli Rep. by Its R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-21-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 -- Sections 2, 4 (1 and 2), 10, 11, 15(1 and 2), 22(1 and 2), 23(1 and 2); Bharathidasan University Act, 1991; All-India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 -- Sections 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, Amendment Act of 1993; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993; Dowry (Prohibition) Act, 1961

Reported in : 1998(3)CTC236; (2001)8SCC676; AIR2001SC2861

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Krishnamoorthi,;Senior Council for M/s. Row and;Reddy,;Mr. V. Kathiravan,;Mr. P. Jayaraman Senior Council for;Mr. K. Muthuramalingam, Advocates

ORDERJudgement Pronounced by Shivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. In these appeals, in the tight of the contentions raised by the parties, the only question that needs to be answered is, whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2003

Mrs. A. Sreedevi, Represented by Her Power of Attorney Agent Vs. the C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-23-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ200

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior counsel for P. Subba Reddy in W.P.Nos. 15952 and 17159/2003 and ;A.L. Somayaji, Senior counsel for ;K. Ramanath Reddy, Adv. in W.P.17186/2003

1. By consent of all the parties and in view of urgency in deciding the issue one way or other writ petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal. Since all the three writ petitions relate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial