Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r k naseem · Page 1 of about 46 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 1991

Ram Bilas and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT211; I(1991)DMC608

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Naseem and; S.K. Bhatia, Advs

V.B. Bansal, J. (1) By way of this revision the petitioners have challenged the order dated 20th November, 1990 holding that a prima facie case for the offence under Sec. 302 Indian Penal Code or in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1999

Dr. Manoj Gupta Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 448

Reported in : 78(1999)DLT121; 1999(49)DRJ129

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Naseem, Adv

N.G. Nandi, J. 1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 24.7.1998 framing charge against the petitioner along with other accused persons. As far as this petitioner is concerned, the charge framed is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2001

Shakeel Ahmed Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)362; 90(2001)DLT694

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Naseem &; Mr. Nitin Sangra, Advs

ORDERUsha Mehra, J. 1. Shakil Ahmad was convicted under Section 302 IPC by the court of Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 27th January, 1996 and has been sentenced vide order of the same date to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 1978

Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-1978

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : 15(1979)DLT126; ILR1979Delhi464; 1979RLR32

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Naseem,; Charanjit Talwar and; K.K. Sud, Advs

Leila Seth, J. (1) The salient point in this case pertains to the amended Section 13(2) of the Prevent'on of Food Adulteration Act. 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The question posed is whether the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 1986

State Vs. Shankar @ Raju

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-17-1986

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1988CriLJ780; 1987(12)DRJ240

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Naseem,; D.R. Sethi,; A. Ahlawat,;

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.(1) The learned Additional Sessions Judge. New Delhi has convicted Devi Chai an accused under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to imprisonment for life and to the payment of fine of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2007

Rakesh Saraha Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-14-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 168, 324, 364A, 365, 368 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT159

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Naseem, Adv. in Crl. Appeal No. 355/2005,; Mukesh Sharma and;

B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. The appellants were tried and punished for offences under Sections 120B IPC read with Sections 364A/365/368/324 and 506 IPC, under Section 364A IPC read with Section 120B IPC, under Section 365 IPC read...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2006

State (Through Cbi) Vs. Santosh Kumar Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-17-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 6, 45 and 46; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 354 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 311 and 313

Reported in : 2007CriLJ964; 133(2006)DLT393; 2006(92)DRJ87

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sharan, ASG,; Ashok Bhan,; Amit Anand Tiwari,;

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 233 of 2000 seeks to challenge judgment dated 3rd December, 1999 of the Additional Sessions Judge in acquitting the respondent herein of the charges under Sections 302 and 376 IPC...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1983

State Vs. Bashir Ahmed and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-26-1983

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act,1950 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162 and 258; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25

Reported in : 23(1983)DLT486

Advocate for Appellant : S.T. Singh,; I.U. Khan,; A.K. Singh and;

M.L. Jain, J.(1) This order will dispose of the following cases under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women & Girls Act, 1956 (herein the Act): (1)Cages under Section 8 of the Act in which proceedings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2006

State (Through Cbi) Vs. Santosh Kumar Singh

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-30-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 376

Reported in : 2006(92)DRJ270

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sharan, ASG; Mukta Gupta; Ashok Bhan; Amit Anand Tiwari; Devashish Bharuka; Farook Razack; Ankur Jain an;

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. By our judgment dated 17th October, 2006 we had held Santosh Kumar Singh guilty under Sections 376 and 302 IPC. We had adjourned the case to give the convict an opportunity to be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2000

State Vs. Siddarth Vashisth and Manu Sharma and Others and Raja Chopra ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52, 120-B, 201, 212 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 173, 227, 228 and 397; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 24

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)829; 2001CriLJ2404; 90(2001)DLT548

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Mukta Gupta,; Sanjiv Sachdeva,; Mr. Harish Ghai,;

ORDERR.C.Chopra, J.1. This order shall dispose of Crl.Revision Petitions Nos.596/2000, 619/2000, 46/2001 and 47/2001, which are directed against order dated 23.11.2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.287/99 registered with P.S. Mehrauli, commonly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial