Advanced Search Results
Ram Bilas and ors. Vs. State
Delhi
Mar-22-1991
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B
44(1991)DLT211; I(1991)DMC608
R.K. Naseem and; S.K. Bhatia, Advs
V.B. Bansal, J. (1) By way of this revision the petitioners have challenged the order dated 20th November, 1990 holding that a prima facie case for the offence under Sec. 302 Indian Penal Code or in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Manoj Gupta Vs. State
Delhi
Feb-15-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B and 448
78(1999)DLT121; 1999(49)DRJ129
R.K. Naseem, Adv
N.G. Nandi, J. 1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 24.7.1998 framing charge against the petitioner along with other accused persons. As far as this petitioner is concerned, the charge framed is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakeel Ahmed Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Delhi
Feb-02-2001
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
2001IIIAD(Delhi)362; 90(2001)DLT694
R.K. Naseem &; Mr. Nitin Sangra, Advs
ORDERUsha Mehra, J. 1. Shakil Ahmad was convicted under Section 302 IPC by the court of Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 27th January, 1996 and has been sentenced vide order of the same date to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Nov-29-1978
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 13(2)
15(1979)DLT126; ILR1979Delhi464; 1979RLR32
R.K. Naseem,; Charanjit Talwar and; K.K. Sud, Advs
Leila Seth, J. (1) The salient point in this case pertains to the amended Section 13(2) of the Prevent'on of Food Adulteration Act. 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The question posed is whether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Shankar @ Raju
Delhi
Dec-17-1986
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
1988CriLJ780; 1987(12)DRJ240
R.K. Naseem,; D.R. Sethi,; A. Ahlawat,;
Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.(1) The learned Additional Sessions Judge. New Delhi has convicted Devi Chai an accused under Section 302/34 Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to imprisonment for life and to the payment of fine of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Saraha Vs. State Through Cbi
Delhi
Dec-14-2007
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 168, 324, 364A, 365, 368 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313
146(2008)DLT159
R.K. Naseem, Adv. in Crl. Appeal No. 355/2005,; Mukesh Sharma and;
B.N. Chaturvedi, J.1. The appellants were tried and punished for offences under Sections 120B IPC read with Sections 364A/365/368/324 and 506 IPC, under Section 364A IPC read with Section 120B IPC, under Section 365 IPC read...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState (Through Cbi) Vs. Santosh Kumar Singh
Delhi
Oct-17-2006
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 6, 45 and 46; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 354 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 311 and 313
2007CriLJ964; 133(2006)DLT393; 2006(92)DRJ87
A. Sharan, ASG,; Ashok Bhan,; Amit Anand Tiwari,;
R.S. Sodhi, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 233 of 2000 seeks to challenge judgment dated 3rd December, 1999 of the Additional Sessions Judge in acquitting the respondent herein of the charges under Sections 302 and 376 IPC...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Bashir Ahmed and ors.
Delhi
Apr-26-1983
Criminal
Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act,1950 - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 162 and 258; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25
23(1983)DLT486
S.T. Singh,; I.U. Khan,; A.K. Singh and;
M.L. Jain, J.(1) This order will dispose of the following cases under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women & Girls Act, 1956 (herein the Act): (1)Cages under Section 8 of the Act in which proceedings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState (Through Cbi) Vs. Santosh Kumar Singh
Delhi
Oct-30-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 376
2006(92)DRJ270
A. Sharan, ASG; Mukta Gupta; Ashok Bhan; Amit Anand Tiwari; Devashish Bharuka; Farook Razack; Ankur Jain an;
R.S. Sodhi, J.1. By our judgment dated 17th October, 2006 we had held Santosh Kumar Singh guilty under Sections 376 and 302 IPC. We had adjourned the case to give the convict an opportunity to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Siddarth Vashisth and Manu Sharma and Others and Raja Chopra ...
Delhi
Mar-13-2000
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 52, 120-B, 201, 212 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 173, 227, 228 and 397; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 24
2001IIIAD(Delhi)829; 2001CriLJ2404; 90(2001)DLT548
Ms. Mukta Gupta,; Sanjiv Sachdeva,; Mr. Harish Ghai,;
ORDERR.C.Chopra, J.1. This order shall dispose of Crl.Revision Petitions Nos.596/2000, 619/2000, 46/2001 and 47/2001, which are directed against order dated 23.11.2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in case FIR No.287/99 registered with P.S. Mehrauli, commonly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »