Advanced Search Results

Shri Date Tanaji Honaji and Prithviraj Vasant Kamble Vs. the Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); ;Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Section 2; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114; ;Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950; ;Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1956; ;Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979; ;Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulations of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - Rules 11 and 12; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Thokade, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 7740 of 2008 and; R.K. Mendadkar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 869

R.G. Ketkar, J. 1. By Writ Petition No. 7740 of 2008 filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Date Tanaji Honaji (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) interaila has prayed...

Shri Jayasing Dhondiram Rajput Vs. State of the Maharashtra Through It ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2006(4)ALLMR220; 2006(4)BomCR190; 2006(3)MhLj642

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar and ;H.K. Mandlik, Advs.

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This petition is filed by a retired Assistant Conservator of Forests against findings recorded by the Caste Verification Committee, Pune. The Committee invalidated his claim as being member of 'Rajput Bhamta' caste and...

Anant Janardan Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayats Election Rules, 1959 - Rules 8 and 11(2A); Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Articles 243O, 243(4) and 226

Reported in : AIR2002Bom87; 2002(2)ALLMR80; 2002(4)BomCR270; (2002)2BOMLR40; 2002(2)MhLj238

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Heard Mr. R.K. Mendadkar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sonawane, learned Assistant Government Pleader.2. By means of this writ petition the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 20th October, 1997...

Avinash D. Mandvikar Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Reported in : [2003(96)FLR282]; (2003)ILLJ439Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Respondent waive service. By consent petition is taken up for final hearing.2. The petitioner joined the services of the respondent bank on October 15, 1976 under the reserved category of Scheduled Tribe....

Kum. Jyoti Pralhad Sangle Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its Sec ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR62; 2003(4)BomCR558; 2003(3)MhLj754

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. At the outset, Mr. R.K. Mendadkar, learned Counselfor Petitioner, handed over affidavit of the Petitionerwhich we mark 'X' for identification purposes. In thesaid affidavit, it is stated that pursuant to the interimorder passed...

Shri. Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid and Others Vs. the District Collector, S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. These petitions arise from the proceedings undertaken for validation of Caste Certificates. The two points that we have framed for our consideration are common in all these petitions and thus, these petitions...

Shri Vijay Kisan Karanjkar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Caste Scheduled Tribes Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes or Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4(1), 6(1), 7(2), 15 and 19; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2004Bom60; 2003(4)ALLMR691; 2004(1)BomCR168; 2004(3)MhLj49

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Adv., ;A.K. Aabhyankar, ;Abhay Oak and ;M.S. Karnik, Advs.

C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule, Mr. R.M. Patne, Assistant Government Pleader, appears and waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. V.A. Thorat, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr. R.K. Mendadkar...

Deepika Yogeshwar Nandanwar Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Secre ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, De-Notified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 324(1)

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR537; 2008(3)BomCR630; (2008)110BOMLR1047; 2008(3)MhLj872

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

Ranjana Desai, J.1. The petitioner claims that she belongs to Halbi Scheduled Tribe which is recognized as Scheduled Tribe under the Presidential Notification issued under Article 324(1) of the Constitution of India. In this petition filed...

Kavita Chandraprakash Goel Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Secret ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 4(1), 7 and 13; State Reorganization Act, 1956; Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes, (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - Rule 4(9); Constitution of India - Article 226, 341 and 342

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR352; 2010(1)MhLj470

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

Ranjana Desai, J.1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties taken up for hearing forthwith.2. The petitioner claims to belong to Chamar caste by birth which is recognized as Scheduled Caste in the State...

Mrs. Hemlata Milind Bacchav @ Kum. Hemlata Nivrutti Kakad Vs. State of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 341 and 342

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR234; 2008(3)BomCR63; (2008)IIILLJ292Bom; 2008(3)MhLj739

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mendadkar, Adv.

Roshan Dalvi, J.1. The Petitioner belongs to Maratha caste by birth. She is married to a person belonging to Mahadev Koli, Scheduled Tribe. The Petitioner claims to belong to Mahadev Koli, Scheduled Tribe by virtue of...