Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r k mehta · Page 1 of about 167 results (0.204 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 13 2004

Manoj Kumar Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-13-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Panel Code - Sections 34, 307, 324 and 326

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT511; 2004(77)DRJ670

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mehta, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Appellants who are brothers were named as offenders by the injured/complainant in FIR No.578/2000 under Section 307/34 IPC P.S. Uttam Nagar. They were tried by the Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.66/01....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1998

Dharma Ram and anr. Vs. Pema Ramji and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-02-1998

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1998 - Sections 149

Reported in : I(1999)ACC540; 2000ACJ593; AIR1999Raj86; 1999(1)WLC721; 1998(1)WLN245

Advocate for Appellant : L.R. Chaudhary,; R.K. Mehta, Advs. for;United Insurance Co. Dharma Ram & Smt. Dami

ORDERShiv Kumar Sharma, J. 1. Both these appeals arise from the common judgment, therefore were heard analogously and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. The claim petition submitted by the claimants Dharma Ram and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2002

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-03-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; High Court Rules - Rule 55

Reported in : AIR2003Raj63; 2003(2)WLN28

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Parjhar and; R.K. Mehta, Advs.

B. Prasad, J.1. These two appeals are filed under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ordinance'). With the repeal of Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, Section 18 also stands...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2010

Gridco Limited Vs. M/S Global Energy Limited and Another

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Feb-08-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellants: Mr. R.K. Mehta and Mr. Antaryani Upadhyay.

This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant-GRIDCO Limited challenging the Order dated 06.05.08 passed by the Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission directing to issue notice to the public inviting opinions and suggestions with reference to grant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2008

indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulator ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : the Review Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.G. Ramachandran with Mr. Anand K. Ganesan and Ms. Swapna Seshadri, Advocates. For the Respondent(s): Mr. Mohit Jolly for NDPL, Mr. R.K. Mehta with Mr. Mragank for DERC

1. The petitioner, who is the appellant in the appeal no. 81 of 2007, has filed an application under section 122(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 seeking to review and clarification of the order dated 10.1.08...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1996

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rukhmani and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-19-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1998ACJ1378

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Mehta, Adv.

Gopal Lal Gupta, J.1. These two appeals arise out of award passed by the learned Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bikaner on 26.7.1989 in Claim Case No. 23 of 1986.2. The owner and the driver have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2003

Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Vs. M.L. Khuteda and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-09-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147

Reported in : II(2004)ACC428; 2005ACJ936; RLW2004(2)Raj1176; 2004(2)WLC495

Advocate for Appellant : T. Gupta and; R.K. Mehta, Advs.

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. These two appeals and the cross-objection of the claimant are against theaward dated 8.4.96 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara in ClaimCase No. 505/92 (180/91)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2011

In the Matter Of: M/S. Enercon (India) Limited, Jaipur and Another Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-30-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant(s) : Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Mr. Anand K. Ganeshan, Ms. Swapna Seshadri, Advocates. Counsel for the Respondent(s) : R2, R4, Mr. K.L. Dhayani Mr. K.L. Nandwani Mr. R.K. Mehta M

P.S. DATTA, JUDICIAL MEMBER 1. How is tariff for the Wind Energy Projects to be commissioned during the FY 2010-11 in the State of Rajasthan to be determined? Whether Regulation 85 of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2003

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madho Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-24-2003

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 96(2), 149, 149(1), 149(2), 149(4), 149(5) and 149(7); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144

Reported in : 2005ACJ1653; AIR2004Raj131

Advocate for Appellant : B.D. Purohit,; R.K. Mehta,; Jagdish Vyas,;

N.P. Gupta, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by the Insurer against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Abu Road dt. 19-9-2000 decreeing the claimants' claim for a sum of Rupees...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2014

Dsj Communication Ltd. Vs. Uoi and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Vikas Pathak

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.757/2014 & CMs No.19262/2014 (for stay), 19261/2014 (for condonation of 102 days delay in filing the appeal) & 19351/2014 (for condonation of 11...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial