Advanced Search Results

Tirthapada Nag and ors. Vs. Ram Babu Gupta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Section 9(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1972Cal411,77CWN483

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Banerjee, ;Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Abhijit Banerjee, Advs.;Gouri Mitter, Adv. General, ;Somen Bose and ;B.C. Basak, Advs.

Mitra, J. 1. This Rule is against an order of the Second Additional District Judge at Howrah in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 262 of 1966. The order was made on the 18th September, 1967.2. On the 30th...

Amulya Gopal Majumdar Vs. United Industrial Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 151 - Order 34, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1974Cal323,78CWN1029

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjit Kumar Banerjee and ;Abinash Chandra Bose, Advs.

A.K. Sinha, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the defendant appellant against the judgment and order passed by the Trial Court granting temporary injunction restraining the appellant from taking delivery of possession of the disputed property...

Harnath Malhotra and anr. Vs. Dhanoo Devi Agarwala

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100-101; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 64 and 114

Reported in : AIR1975Cal98

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Deb and ;Prabhat K. Mukherjee, Advs. in S.A. 804/71 and ;R.K. Banerjee, ;Tapan Kumar Mitra and ;Debi Prosad Mukherji, Advs. in S.A. 805/71

A.K. Sinha, J.1. These two second appeals are preferred by two separate tenants against a common appellate judgment and decree for ejectment from the disputed premises, briefly in the following circumstances :Two separate suits were filed...

Kanti Mohan Mondal Vs. Naba Kumar Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Section 7; ;Bengal Money Lenders Act, 1940 - Sections 36, 37 and 38

Reported in : AIR1975Cal347

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Banerjee and ;Abhijit Banerjee, Advs.

ORDER1. On January 25, 1965 the plaintiff executed a deed of sale in respect of his residential hou.se at Gondalpara, Chander-nagore in favour of defendant No. 1, son of the other two defendants and simultaneously two...

Niranjan Modak Vs. Lakshmi Narayan GuIn and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 7 - Order 41, Rule 33; ;Transfer of Property Act; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 13(1)

Reported in : AIR1976Cal322,(1976)1CompLJ168(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Banerjee and ;Abhijit Kr. Banerjee, Advs.

R. Bhattacharya, J.1. This appeal is by the defendant Niranjan Modak who suffered a decree for ejectment in respect of the suit premises in the original suit filed by the plaintiff Lakshminarayan Guin and others, the...

Jagat Bandhu Shaw and ors. Vs. Ram Nagina Pandey

Court : Kolkata

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144, 144(1) and 151 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : AIR1977Cal281

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Banerjee and ;Bhaskar Ghose, Advs.

R. Bhattacharya, J. 1. The plaintiffs who are the appellants before us filed a suit for eviction of the respondent-defendant under the provisions of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. At first the suit was...

State of Bihar Vs. Ramlu Pandit and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Prasun Kumar Deb, J.1. The judgment of acquittal passed by Shri Pius Xess. the Then 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, dated 27th February, 1991, in Sessions trial No. 222 of 1989 against the respondents who were...

Baldeo Pershad Vs. Dwarika Pd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12, 12(2) and 12(3) - Schedule - Articles 170 and 179

Reported in : AIR1957All334

Advocate for Appellant : Ambika Prasad and ;Raja Ram Agarwala, Advs.

Mootham, C.J.1. The question referred to this Bench is 'Whether in computing the period of limitation prescribed for an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court the applicant is entitled to exclude the time...

G.N. Nayak Vs. Goa University and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Goa University Act, 1984 - Sections 18, 22, 23, 23(2) and 25; Indian Forest Service (Initial Recruitment) Regulations, 1966 - Regulation 3

Reported in : AIR2002SC790; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)224; 2002(4)BomCR216; [2002(92)FLR901]; JT2002(1)SC526; 2002(1)SCALE491; (2002)2SCC712; [2002]1SCR636; 2002(1)SCT1052(SC); 2002(2)SLJ308(SC); (2001) 2 SCC3302

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. and; N. Ganapathy, Adv

Leave granted.The object of scrutiny, in this judgment, is the selection of the appellant as Professor of Marine Science in the University of Goa. The appellant's selection was challenged under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

The Tata Oil Mills Co., Ltd. Vs. Workmen and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Service Rules - Rules 40 and 40(1)

Reported in : AIR1966SC1672; [1963(6)FLR257]; (1966)IILLJ602SC; [1964]2SCR125

Gajendragadkar, J. 1. Mr. R.K. Banerjee had been employed by the appellant, the Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd., as a Salesman on April 3, 1956, as a probationer and he was confirmed on November 5, 1956....