Advanced Search Results
Balkishan Bansal Vs. Chandra Prakash
Rajasthan
Jun-11-2000
CivilProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 152
2000(3)WLC315; 2001(2)WLN576
R.K. Agrawal, Adv.
ORDERMadan, J.1. In this revision petition, the petitioner (judgment debtor) has challenged the order dated 18.4.2000 of the Civil Judge (JD) Ajmer (West) in execution Case No. 12/95 whereby application of the plaintiff (decree holder) moved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTara Chand Vs. Bhanwar Lal
Rajasthan
Nov-29-2005
Tenancy
Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(3) and 19A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100(5) and 151
RLW2006(2)Raj950; 2006(2)WLC71
R.K. Agrawal and; Alok Chaturvedi, Advs.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. On October 23, 1975 the plaintiff respondent (for short, 'landlord') filed the suit for ejectment on the ground of default of payment of rent and nuisance against the defendant appellant (for short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Prakash Agarwal Through L.Rs. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Agrawal and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-08-2008
Property
AIR2009Raj3
Mr. J. P. Goyal, Mr. R. K. Agrawal
ORDERJitendra Ray Goyal, J.1. Since these two appeals being inter-related and involve one and the same core question of pre-emption in regard to the common property, hence both the appeals are taken up together for hearing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Rani Rajendra Kumari Ba
Allahabad
Feb-19-1991
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17(1)
[1991]192ITR419(All)
R.K. Agrawal, Adv.
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.1. Under Section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the Tribunal has stated the following questions in respect of the assessment years 1965-66 to 1967-68 : --'(1) Whether, on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan State Electricity Board and anr. Vs. Ram Deo and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-09-1999
Constitution
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rules 1(3) and 5(5) - Order 43, Rules 1(3) and 5(5)
AIR1999Raj264
R.K. Agrawal, Adv.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. At the time of consideration of submissions advanced in respect of admission of the appeal a short and interesting question arose in respect of interpretation of the provisions contained in Sub-Rule (3)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagir Singh Vs. Ranjeet Singh and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-15-2005
Civil
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19 and 20; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 27; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 14, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 22
AIR2006Raj105; RLW2005(4)Raj2941; 2005(4)WLC447
R.K. Agrawal, Adv.
V.K. Bali, J.1. The significant questions of law that need adjudication in the context of the contentions as have been raised by the learned counsel appearing for the parties are as to whether mere denial of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatan Singh and ors. Vs. Chhitar Lal
Rajasthan
Jan-25-2007
Tenancy
RLW2007(3)Raj2052
Mr. R.K. Agrawal
R.S. Chauhan, J.1.The appellant-plaintiffs have challenged the order dated 29.7.99 passed by the Addl. District Judge No. 3, Kota whereby the learned Judge has set aside the judgment and decree dated 27.10.86 passed by the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwandas and ors. Vs. Bhawandas and anr.
Rajasthan
Apr-22-1999
Civil
Rajasthan Court-Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1961 - Schedule - Articles 1 and 11
AIR2000Raj67; 1999(3)WLC123; 1999(1)WLN606
R.K. Agrawal, Adv.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The meaningful question that falls for consideration in the instant revision petition is as towhat should be the court-fee in a contentious case for grant of probate or letter of administration.2. This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Raja Y.D. Dubey
Allahabad
Jan-25-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)198CTR(All)271
Shambhoo Chopra, for the Revenue.
ORDERR.K. Agrawal, J.The ITAT, Allahabad has referred the following questions of law under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court'1. Whether on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur Vs. State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipu ...
Rajasthan
Mar-20-2001
Direct Taxation
Companies (Profits) Sur Tax Act, 1964 - Sections 6(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80M and 256(1) and (2); Super Profits Tax Act, 1963; Companies Act, 1956
2001(2)WLC387; 2001(3)WLN714
R.K. Agrawal, Adv.
ORDERLakshmanan, C.J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.(2). These reference applications have been filed under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act against the orders dated, 29.11.94 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »