Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r j kochar · Page 1 of about 397 results (0.255 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 1997

Govind Ragho Khairnar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 54, 55, 60-A, 64(3), 73-A, 74, 76-A, 77, 78-A, 79, 80-A, 81, 82, 83, 351, 354-A and 521; Municipal Servant's Conduct & Discipline Rules - Rules 2 to 40 and 41; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 226, 227 and 309; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Order 23; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR194; 1998(1)BomCR179

Advocate for Appellant : Aspi Chinoy, S.A. and ;R.J. Kochar, Adv.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. Shri Govind Ragho Khairnar, the petitioner, by means of this writ petition challenges his suspension vide order dated 28-6-1994, the disciplinary proceedings including the report and findings of the Enquiry Officer, Resolution No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 1995

Nagare P.D. Vs. Skf Bearings India Ltd. and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ571Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Kochar, Adv.

1. This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the Awards dated November 16, 1990 and January 24, 1991 made by the 2nd Labour Court, Pune, in reference (IDA) No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2012

Sunil Keshav Rane Vs. Way 2 Wealth Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (Trading Me ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-02-2012

Subject : Arbitration

The Petitioner has challenged the impugned award dated 28 April 2009, passed by the Arbitrator in the matter of Arbitration under Bye-laws, Rules and Regulations of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (for short, “NSEIL”)....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 2012

Sunil Keshav Rane Vs. Way 2 Wealth Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (Trading Me ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-02-2012

Subject : Arbitration

The Petitioner has challenged the impugned award dated 28 April 2009, passed by the Arbitrator in the matter of Arbitration under Bye-laws, Rules and Regulations of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (for short, “NSEIL”)....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2001

R.P. Sawant and ors. Vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-12-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 7, 21(1), 25T, 25U, 26 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982

Reported in : 2002(4)BomCR376; [2001(91)FLR37]; (2001)IILLJ1349Bom; 2002(1)MhLj626

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, ;S.R. Nargolkar, ;S.B. Bombale Deshmukh, ;Seema Sarnaik and ;P.M.Gore, Advs.

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These four Letters Patent Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 24th December, 1999 delivered by the learned Single Judge (R.J. Kochar, J.) in Writ Petition No. 5536 of 1998 and Writ Petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2000

Smita Ambalal Patel Vs. Ila VipIn Pandya

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-16-2000

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13, 14, 14(2), 14(3), 15, 17 and 18; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952; Consitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR436; (2001)3BOMLR610

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person;Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, Adv. General

B. N. Srikrishna, J. 1. Long long ago, on the eve of the war at Kurukshetra, Lord Krishna advised the educated leaders of society against doing anything which would incite persons from the lower echelons of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2002

K.K. Vasudeva Kurup Vs. Phulchand Exports Ltd. and Rivian Internationa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434(1) and 439

Reported in : [2003]113CompCas401(Bom); [2004]54SCL219(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person and ;Vijayalaxmi, Adv.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner is a learned advocate practising in the City Civil Court and in the High Court. He has filed the present two petitions under Section 439 read with Sections 433 and 434...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2000

Ramesh S/O. Pandharinath Taharabadkar Vs. Executive Engineer, Jayakwad ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-13-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25C, 25F, 25G, 25L, 25N, 25FFF, 33(1) and 33(2); Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 81; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2001)IIILLJ889Bom

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner union appears to have espoused the cause of in all 107 employees who were employed by the State of Maharashtra under the Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 as the heads of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2001

Air India Ltd. Vs. N.P. Wadkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-29-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR755; 2001(3)BomCR420; [2001(90)FLR782]; (2001)ILLJ1150Bom

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., ;Abhay Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The aircraft of the Petitioners Air India, appears to have landed on a wrong airport of full adjudication under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, instead of the approval proceedings under Section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2005

Pedru Mozes Fernandes Vs. National Textile Corporation (S.M.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-08-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 42(4), 71, 72, 78, 78(1), 78(1)A, 79, 79(1), 79(3) and 84; Textile Undertakings Takeover of Management Act, 1983; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Industrial Relations Rules, 1947 - Rules 32(2), 53 and 53(2)

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR403; [2005(107)FLR660]; 2005(4)MhLj199

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Ganguli, Adv.

D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. In an appeal filed under Section 84 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 the Industrial Court has set aside an order of reinstatement and of backwages that was passed by the Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial