Advanced Search Results
Govind Ragho Khairnar Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and ...
Mumbai
Jul-04-1997
Service
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 54, 55, 60-A, 64(3), 73-A, 74, 76-A, 77, 78-A, 79, 80-A, 81, 82, 83, 351, 354-A and 521; Municipal Servant's Conduct & Discipline Rules - Rules 2 to 40 and 41; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 226, 227 and 309; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Order 23; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
1998(1)ALLMR194; 1998(1)BomCR179
Aspi Chinoy, S.A. and ;R.J. Kochar, Adv.
ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. Shri Govind Ragho Khairnar, the petitioner, by means of this writ petition challenges his suspension vide order dated 28-6-1994, the disciplinary proceedings including the report and findings of the Enquiry Officer, Resolution No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagare P.D. Vs. Skf Bearings India Ltd. and Another
Mumbai
Jul-14-1995
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A
(1997)IIILLJ571Bom
R.J. Kochar, Adv.
1. This Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the Awards dated November 16, 1990 and January 24, 1991 made by the 2nd Labour Court, Pune, in reference (IDA) No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Keshav Rane Vs. Way 2 Wealth Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (Trading Me ...
Mumbai
Aug-02-2012
Arbitration
The Petitioner has challenged the impugned award dated 28 April 2009, passed by the Arbitrator in the matter of Arbitration under Bye-laws, Rules and Regulations of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (for short, “NSEIL”)....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sunil Keshav Rane Vs. Way 2 Wealth Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. (Trading Me ...
Mumbai
Aug-02-2012
Arbitration
The Petitioner has challenged the impugned award dated 28 April 2009, passed by the Arbitrator in the matter of Arbitration under Bye-laws, Rules and Regulations of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (for short, âNSEILâ)....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.P. Sawant and ors. Vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-12-2001
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 5, 7, 21(1), 25T, 25U, 26 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982
2002(4)BomCR376; [2001(91)FLR37]; (2001)IILLJ1349Bom; 2002(1)MhLj626
C.U. Singh, ;S.R. Nargolkar, ;S.B. Bombale Deshmukh, ;Seema Sarnaik and ;P.M.Gore, Advs.
B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. These four Letters Patent Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 24th December, 1999 delivered by the learned Single Judge (R.J. Kochar, J.) in Writ Petition No. 5536 of 1998 and Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmita Ambalal Patel Vs. Ila VipIn Pandya
Mumbai
Nov-16-2000
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 13, 14, 14(2), 14(3), 15, 17 and 18; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952; Consitution of India - Article 32
2001(2)BomCR436; (2001)3BOMLR610
Party in person;Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, Adv. General
B. N. Srikrishna, J. 1. Long long ago, on the eve of the war at Kurukshetra, Lord Krishna advised the educated leaders of society against doing anything which would incite persons from the lower echelons of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.K. Vasudeva Kurup Vs. Phulchand Exports Ltd. and Rivian Internationa ...
Mumbai
Nov-01-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434(1) and 439
[2003]113CompCas401(Bom); [2004]54SCL219(Bom)
Party in person and ;Vijayalaxmi, Adv.
R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner is a learned advocate practising in the City Civil Court and in the High Court. He has filed the present two petitions under Section 439 read with Sections 433 and 434...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh S/O. Pandharinath Taharabadkar Vs. Executive Engineer, Jayakwad ...
Mumbai
Jul-13-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25C, 25F, 25G, 25L, 25N, 25FFF, 33(1) and 33(2); Industrial Disputes Rules - Rule 81; Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2001)IIILLJ889Bom
R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner union appears to have espoused the cause of in all 107 employees who were employed by the State of Maharashtra under the Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 as the heads of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir India Ltd. Vs. N.P. Wadkar
Mumbai
Jan-29-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)
2001(3)ALLMR755; 2001(3)BomCR420; [2001(90)FLR782]; (2001)ILLJ1150Bom
C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., ;Abhay Kulkarni, Adv.
ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The aircraft of the Petitioners Air India, appears to have landed on a wrong airport of full adjudication under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, instead of the approval proceedings under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPedru Mozes Fernandes Vs. National Textile Corporation (S.M.) Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-08-2005
Labour and Industrial
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 42(4), 71, 72, 78, 78(1), 78(1)A, 79, 79(1), 79(3) and 84; Textile Undertakings Takeover of Management Act, 1983; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Industrial Relations Rules, 1947 - Rules 32(2), 53 and 53(2)
2006(2)BomCR403; [2005(107)FLR660]; 2005(4)MhLj199
N.M. Ganguli, Adv.
D.Y. Chandrachud, J.1. In an appeal filed under Section 84 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 the Industrial Court has set aside an order of reinstatement and of backwages that was passed by the Labour...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »