Advanced Search Results
Jagannath Prabhashankar Joshi and anr. Vs. Varadkar and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-09-1960
CommercialConstitution
Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Imports (Control) Order, 1955; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1961Bom244; (1961)63BOMLR1
R.J. Joshi and ;Suresh D. Parekh, Advs.
Mudholkar, AG. C. J. 1. This is an appeal from the Judgment of Mr. Justice Shelat in Misc. Petition No. 81 of 1959. This petition was instituted by the two petitioners under Article 226 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Sales Tax Vs. P. Ambalal and Co.
Mumbai
Mar-18-1977
Direct Taxation
Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 15
(1977)6CTR(Bom)382
R.J. Joshi, Adv.
Madon, J. 1. In this Reference under S. 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, the following two questions have been referred to us at the instance of the Applicant :- '(1) Whether, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation for Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Devidayal Metal ...
Mumbai
Aug-01-1983
Electricity
Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 3(2), 21(2) and 37; Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 27 and 27(1); Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 - Sections 4(1)
(1983)85BOMLR540
K.K. Singhvi,;C.J. Sawant,;I.M. Chagla,;F.T. Sikandar, Adv.;for Adv.-General on notice,;A. Hidayatullah,;Zia S. Sorabjee,;J.R. Gagrat,;C.M. Mehta and;V.B. Asgarwalla, Advs.;R.J. Joshi,;S.K. Sethana an
Chandurkar, Ag. C.J.1. This appeal filed by the Municipal corporation of Greater Bombay and the General Manager of the Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City - I Vs. ScIndia Steam Navigati ...
Mumbai
Mar-12-1970
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(5) and 31(3)
[1971]80ITR589(Bom)
R.J. Joshi, Adv.
Mody, J.1. This is a reference under section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922. 2. The assessee is a shipping company. The relevant assessment year is 1952-53, the accounting year being the year ended on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye
Mumbai
Nov-17-1980
Civil
(1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93
Madon, J.1. The circumstances which led to this Special Bench being constituted are that on September 10, 1980 a Division Bench of this High Court consisting of Madon and Shah JJ., while hearing an Appeal, namely,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuman Chadha and Another vs.central Bank of India
Delhi
Sep-27-2018
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONTEMPT APPEAL (CIVIL) No.3/2017 Reserved on :8. h March, 2018 Date of decision:27. h September, 2018 SUMAN CHADHA AND ANOTHER .....Appellants Through Mr. Atul...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaymond Woollen Mills Ltd. and Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jun-30-1986
MRTP
(1986)(26)ELT962TriDel
1. First mentioned two appeals, filed by M/s. Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd., Bombay emanate from a common Order-in-Appeal passed by Central Board of Customs & Excise. Third appeal, which is by M/s. Voltas Ltd., Bombay arose...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWealth-tax Officer Vs. C.J. Sheth
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
May-09-1983
Direct Taxation
(1983)4ITD706(Mum.)
1. The point at issue centres around the scope of Explanation II(ii)(e) to Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 ('the Act'), which has been framed for computing the market value of unquoted equity shares of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShantilal Ambalal Mehta Vs. M.A. Rangaswamy
Mumbai
Apr-22-1977
Constitution
(1977)79BOMLR633; 1977MhLJ587
Chandurkar, J.1. There are several petitions pending in this Court filed by litigants under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as it originally stood before the Constitution of India was amended by the Constitution (Forty-second...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtic Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-11-1983
Excise
(1983)LC389DTri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an application for stay filed by M/s Atic Industries Ltd., Atul in connection with the appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise, Baroda vide Order No. 2 of 1982. It...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »