Advanced Search Results

R.T. Chinnavenkatesh Vs. the Senior Regional Transport Officer and Lic ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor VehiclesLimitation

Acts : Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 - Sections 15; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1976Kant69; 1975(2)KarLJ385

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Babu, Adv.

1. In these two writ petitions the question that arise for consideration is whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable to appeals filed under Section 15 of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957....

The Coffee Board Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 5(3), 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 17

Reported in : ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : F. S. Nariman, Senior Advocate assisted by R.J. Babu;V.P. Raman, Senior Advocate assisted by T. Subba Rao, ; P.K. Kurien, Senior Advocate, ; K.P. Kumar and ;B. Veerabhadrappa, Advs.

ORDERPuttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by one of us, these cases were posted before a Division Bench for disposal. 2. A statutory Board called 'the Coffee Board' ('the Board') which was formerly called the Indian...

K.R. Ramaswami Rao and ors. Vs. Premabai and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 95

Reported in : AIR1988Kant116; ILR1987KAR1751

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Babu, Adv.

Doddakale Gowda, J.1. The nature of a bequest made by a father to his son, with reference to the claim of his grandsons raises a neat question of law in this appeal.2. The issue arises in...

Lingamma Vs. Basavaraju

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : ILR1988KAR433

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Babu, Adv.

Nesargi, J.1. Defendant-1 in O.S. No. 412 of 1972 on the file of the Munsiff, Srirangapatna, is the appellant. Respondent-1 is the plaintiff. Respondents 2 to 4 are the remaining defendants 2 to 4.2. The undisputed...

Chanda Sab Vs. Jamshed Khan and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 144 - Order 21, Rules 97 to 103 - Order 39, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52;

Reported in : AIR1993Kant338; ILR1993KAR2197; 1993(2)KarLJ638

Advocate for Appellant : R.J. Babu, Adv.

ORDER1. The Revision Petition is against grant of a temporary injunction restraining restitution. Petitioner is the dispossessed tenant. Respondents 1 and 2 are the present tenants in occupation. Respondent No. 3 is the owner who dispossessed...

Venkatamma and ors. Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer, City Imp ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : City of Mysore Improvement Act, 1903 - Sections 14, 14(2), 14(3), 15, 16, 16(2), 17, 18, 18(1) and 23(2); Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(2), 5, 5A, 6, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23, 23(1), 23(2) and 50(2); Constituion of India - Article 31; Mysore High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 7(1); Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951; Kanpur Urban Area Development Act, 1945; City of Bangalore Improvement Act - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR1972Kant193; AIR1972Mys193

Advocate for Appellant : B. Krishna Rao and ;R.J. Babu, Advs.

E.S. Venkatakamiah, J. 1. The question of law referred to the Full Bench in all the above cases is as follows:-- 'Whether the relevant date for determining the market value of the property acquired under the...

T.R.N. Swamy Vs. Director of Mines and Geology

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1969 - Sections 61 and 62

Reported in : ILR1987KAR262

Advocate for Appellant : D.L.N. Rao, Adv.

ORDERMurlidher Rao, J.1. Petitioner has filed these two petitions. Common set of facts have given rise to two causes of action. Reliefs asked for are separate but concerning a common transaction.Facts :Petitioner applied for grant of...

Workmen of Karnataka Agro Proteins Ltd. Vs. Karnataka Agro Proteins Lt ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [1991(63)FLR216]; ILR1991KAR244

1. The General Secretary, Employees Union of Karnataka Agro Proteins Ltd. (K.A.P.L.), has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus or other...

The Selection Committee for Admission to the Medical and Dental Colleg ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 342; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1956; Hindu Law; Mitakshara Law

Reported in : AIR1972Kant44; AIR1972Mys44

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Byra Reddy, Adv.

Chandrashekhar, J.1. Does overlooking a binding decision. constitute a ground for reviewing a judgment or order of a Court? That is the question that arises for decision in this review petition.2. This is a petition for...

Kerala Plantation Corporation Employees Union(Citu) vs the Plantation ...

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 24TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 14801 OF 2019 PETITIONER : KERALA PLANTATION CORPORATION EMPLOYEES’...