Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r f nariman · Page 1 of about 717 results (0.141 seconds)

Dec 08 2006

Rochem Separation Systems (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mazagon Dock Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR426; 2007(1)CTLJ153(SC); 2006(13)SCALE590

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.,; R.R. Malar,; P. Venugopal,;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and final order dated 21.04.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 884 of 2005.3. The appellant is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2002

Dr. J.J. Merchant and ors. Vs. Shrinath Chaturvedi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2002

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 203 and 304A; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 12, 13, 13(3A), 13(4), 20(1), 20(1A), 20(1B), 22C, 22D and 24B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 14 - Order 8, Rule 1 and 1A - Order 18, Rule 4; Consumer Protection Rules - Rule 14

Reported in : AIR2002SC2931; 2002(5)ALD43(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)605; 2002(4)AWC2865(SC); 2002(3)BLJR1899; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN6; (2002)4CompLJ145(SC); III(2002)CPJ8(SC); [2002(3)JCR137(SC); (2002) 6 SCC 635

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.,; P. Venugopal,; P.S. Sudheer and;

Shah, J.1. Miscellaneous Petition No. 53 of 2000 was filed before the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'National Commission'), New Delhi in Original Petition No. 252 of 1993 by the appellants-doctors praying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2009

JamiruddIn Ansari Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 5, 9, 9(1), 9(4), 23, 23(1), 23(2) and 25; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 12, 13(1) and 13(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 4, 156(3), 190, 190(1), 197, 202 and 319; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 14(1); Prevention of Terrorism Activities Act, 2002 - Sections 29 and 50; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 8; Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 5A and 6

Reported in : AIR2009SC2781; 2009CriLJ3961; JT2009(8)SC169; 2009(7)SCALE263; (2009)6SCC316:2009AIRSCW4213

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar,; R.F. Nariman,; R.S. Sodhi,;

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted in SLP(Crl.)No.5677/2007.2. Criminal Appeal Nos. 1085, 1088 and 1089 of 2006 have been taken up for final disposal along with SLP(Crl.) No. 5677 of 2007, inasmuch as, they arise out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Apr 17 2006

Rodemadan India Limited Vs. International Trade Expo Center Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(1), 9, 11, 11(6) and 42; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 299 and 300; Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 7, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 145

Reported in : AIR2006SC3456; 2006(2)ARBLR83(SC); 2006(3)AWC2262(SC); (2007)1CALLT18(SC); [2006]131CompCas326(SC); (2006)5CompLJ191(SC); 2006(3)CTC557; [2006(3)JCR3(SC)]; JT2006(5)SC203; (2006) 11 SCC 651

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.,; C. Mukhopadhaya,; Manu Nair and;

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for appointment of a Presiding Arbitrator/ Chairperson of the Arbitral Tribunal under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2008

Tata Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-09-2008

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(6) and 11(12); Companies Act, 1956; LCIA Arbitration Rules

Reported in : AIR2008SC2970; 2008(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2008BusLR683(SC); (2008)4CompLJ220(SC); JT2008(7)SC575; (2008)7MLJ734(SC); 2008(9)SCALE717; (2008)10SCC187; 2008(2)LC825(SC); 2008AIRSCW5015; 2008(4)CivilLJ91

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve,; R.F. Nariman and; Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Two companies, first being M/s. Tata Industries Ltd., and the second being M/s. Apex Investments (Mauritius) Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) have approached this Court under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2004

Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 437, 437(1)(1), 438, 439 and 439(2)

Reported in : AIR2004SC1866; 2004(2)BLJR1121; 2004CriLJ1796; JT2004(3)SC442; 2004(3)SCALE257; (2004)7SCC528

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.,; Sandeep Sethi,; Sumeet Mehtra,;

N. Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. The appellant herein is the complainant in CBI Case No. RC.12(S)/98/SIC.IV/New Delhi. According to the said complaint, the first respondent herein conspired with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2006

Jindal Vijayanagar Steel (Jsw Steel Ltd.) Vs. Jindal Praxair Oxygen Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 9, 21, 37(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 16, 17, 20, 120, 141 and 151; Letters Patent Act; Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953; Haryana Urban Control of Rent and Eviction Act; Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR340(SC); 2006(6)BomCR309; [2006]134CompCas119(SC); JT2006(8)SC230; 2006(8)SCALE668; (2005)11SCC521; 2006AIRSCW5130

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman Sr. Adv.,; T.K. Cooper,; Manu Nair,;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The above appeal was filed by the appellant seeking special leave to appeal against the final order dated 02.03.2006 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Arbitration Petition No. 459...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2006

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited and anr. Vs. Verma Transport Company

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-08-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20, 21 and 34; Arbitration Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; ;Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 7, 8, 8(1), 8(3), 16, 42, 45 and 54; ;Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 - Sections 3; ;Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR2006SC2800; 2006(3)ARBLR210(SC); 2006(4)AWC4011(SC); JT2006(7)SC404; 2006(7)SCALE565; (2006)7SCC275; 2006(2)LC1118(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.,; Pratap Venugopal,; Surekha Raman

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation and application of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the 1996' Act) is in question in these appeals which arise out of a judgment and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2000

M/S. Haldiram Bhujiawala and Another Vs. M/S. Anand Kumar Deepak Kumar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2000

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 2 and 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Trade Marks Act; Registration of Business Names Act, 1916 - Sections 7 and 8; Business Names Act, 1985; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Transfer of Property Act

Reported in : AIR2000SC1287; 84(2000)DLT301(SC); JT2000(2)SC596; (2000)IIMLJ159(SC); 2000(2)SCALE177; (2000)3SCC250; [2000]1SCR1247; 2000(1)LC603(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok H. Desai,; R.F. Nariman, Sr. Advs.,; R.K. Jain,;

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred by the two defendants, M/s. Haldiram Bhujiawala and Sri Ashok Kumar against the judgment of the Delhi High Court in FAO 365 of 1999 dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2005

V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Vs. Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2005

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 48 and 120; Mormugao Port (Shipment of Ore and Pellets from Mechanised Ore Handling Plant at berth no. 9 and related matters) Regulations, 1979; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 12, Rule 6; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 134 to 137 and 149; Limitation Act - Sections 3, 5, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Bombay Port Trust Act, 1879 - Sections 64A and 87; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 527; General Clauses Act; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 131; Excise Act; Customs Act; Income Tax Act; Railways Act; Land Acquisition Act; Indian Ports Act, 1908

Reported in : AIR2005SC4138; 2005(5)BomCR374; JT2005(3)SC607; (2005)140PLR743; (2005)4SCC613; [2005] 3 SCR 27

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.,; Milind Sathe,; Bhavik Palan and;

Ashok Bhan, J.1. These appeals by grant of leave are directed against the common judgment and order of affirmation passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in First Appeal No.27 of 1992 and appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.