Advanced Search Results
Pralhad Lokram Dodeja and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-09-2001
Property
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 4, 6, 9, 23, 23(1), 26, 26(1), 37, 50, 125, 126, 126(2) and (3), 127, 128 and 128(1) and (3); Constitution of India - Articles 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5-A (1) and (2), 6, 11-A, 4(1), 12(1) and (2), 16, 17, 35, 36, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 and 48(1) and (2); Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 62; Bangalore Development Act, 1976; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1955 - Sections 81 and 84; Karnataka Act, 1972; Calcutta Act, 1911; Uttar Pradesh Act, 1965; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Land Acquisition (Company) Rules, 1963 - Rules 3 and 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 15 (2) - Order 19
2001(4)BomCR35; (2001)3BOMLR65
Mr. K.K. Singhavi, Senior Advocate , ;Mr. N.V. Walawalkar, ;Mr. G.H. Keluskar, ;Mr. M.L. Patil and ;Mr. R.D. Soni, Advs.
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Can proceedings for acquisition of land lawfully taken be challenged., by filing a writ petition after any number of years What should be the approach of the Government and its Ministers when an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKisanrao Manikrao Khopade and Another Vs. Municipal Council, Dhule and ...
Mumbai
Sep-04-1991
PropertyOther Taxes
Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 175, 183, 200, 202, 207, 208, 183, 202, 322 and 328; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act - Sections 45(2); Constitution of India - Article 166
AIR1992Bom249; 1991(4)BomCR9; (1992)94BOMLR808
C.J. Sawant with;P.P. Chavan, Advs.;N.B. Shah, Adv.;R.D. Soni, A.G.P.
ORDERS. W. Puranik, J.1. The petitioners are residents of Dhule and own property situate within the jurisdiction of Municipal Council, Dhule. The grievance of the petitioners is that the 1st petitioner had submitted his lay out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamdil Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Videcon International Ltd. and ...
Mumbai
Jun-29-1999
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(9) and 24; Government of India Act - Sections 107
2000(2)ALLMR434; 2000(1)BomCR54
R.S. Mohite, Adv.
ORDERDr. B.P. SARAF, J.1. By this appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the appellants seek to challenge the order dated 27th January 1999 of the learned Single Judge rejecting their application for transfer of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Varun Polymol Organics Ltd. and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...
Mumbai
Nov-17-1994
Sales Tax
Bombay Sales Tax, 1959 - Sections 2(12B), 2(12C), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), (35) and (36), 3, 38, 38 (4), 41, 41(1) and B; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 6A, 8 and 8(5)
1995(3)BomCR502
D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The 1st petitioner herein has set up a manufacturing unit at MIDC, Mahad, an underdeveloped area of the State of Maharashtra in district Raigad manufacturing pesticides covered under entry 31 of Schedule C,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Videocon Industries Limited Vs. M/S Whirlpool of India Limited
Mumbai
Aug-13-2012
MRTP
N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. The trial Court by the impugned order has restrained the appellant-defendant 'Videocon Industries Ltd., from marketing a certain design of washing machine. According to respondent-plaintiff M/s.Whirlpool India Ltd., the appellant M/s.Videocon Industries...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHariprasad Mohanlal Soni and Others Vs. Malegaon Municipal Corporation
Mumbai
Feb-24-2015
Arbitration
Oral Judgment: 1. The above Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India take exception to three identical orders all dated 18th November, 2010 passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Nashik, by which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Videocon Industries Limited Vs. M/S Whirlpool of India Limited
Mumbai
Aug-13-2012
MRTP
N.M. Jamdar, J. 1. The trial Court by the impugned order has restrained the appellant-defendant 'Videocon Industries Ltd., from marketing a certain design of washing machine. According to respondent-plaintiff M/s.Whirlpool India Ltd., the appellant M/s.Videocon Industries...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Ramchandra Gosalka Vs. Sunil Dattatray Tatkare and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-23-1996
Election
Representation of People's Act, 1951 - Sections 81(3), 83(1), 86(1) and 86(3)
1997(3)BomCR110
B.D. Joshi, ;F.D. D'vitre, ;Manoj Bhatt, ;Nusrat Shah and ;C.J. Pooniwala, Advs.
R.G. Vaidyanatha, J.1. These are four Election Petitions filed by the respective petitioners challenging the election of returned candidates. In all these cases the respective respondents have taken a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYashwant Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-12-1989
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B(2) and 25F
[1989(59)FLR607]; (1991)ILLJ501Raj; 1989(2)WLN276
Rajendra Soni, Adv.
Byas, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner prays for quashing orders Annexure 8 & Annexure 9 each dated 13th June 1987 by which his services were terminated with forthwith effect.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrade Well, a Proprietorship Firm and Mr. Suniel K. Mehta, Proprietor ...
Mumbai
Apr-02-2007
BankingCriminal
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI) - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3A), 13(4), 14, 14(3), 17, 17(1), 17(3), 18, 19, 31, 34, 35 and 38; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 47 and 48; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(4), 11(5), 11(6) and 11(7); Registration Act; Bombay Police Act; Customs Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19(1), 20 and 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 357; U.P. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Abhiniyam, 1964 - Sections 17; Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Rules 8, 8(3), 9, 9(6), 9(7), 9(8), 9(9) and 9(10); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 95 and 96; Constitu
2007CriLJ2544; [2008]81SCL173(Bom)
R.D. Soni and ;G.R. Kinkhabwalla, Advs., i/b., Ram & Co. in Criminal Writ Petition Nos. 2767, 27 and 124 of 2007 and ;Subhash Zha, Adv., i/b., Law Global in Criminal Writ Petition No. 343 of 2007
Ranjana Desai, J.1. The question which arises in these writ petitions is whether while dealing with a written request made by a secured creditor under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »