Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r d khare · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.080 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 21 2004

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Salamat Mia and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-21-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 - Sections 2; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Andhra Pradesh Public Employees (Recording and Alteration of Date of Birth) Rules, 1984 - Rule 2(5); Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (acquisition) Act, 1971; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition)(Amendment) Act, 1985; India Factories Act, 1881; Indian Factories (Amendment) Act, 1934; Indian Factories (Amendement) Act, 1948 - Sections 67

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3180

Advocate for Appellant : R.D. Khare and ;Virendra Singh, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, U. P. State Sugar Corporation Limited, Unit Siswa Bazar, District Maharajganj. seeks a writ, order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1998

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd., Mahrajganj Vs. Ambika Singh and Ano ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-04-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC887

Advocate for Appellant : Remesh Kumar Shukla and ;R.D. Khare, Advs.

R.R.K. Trivedi, J. 1. In this petition counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent No. 1. Learned counsel for the parties agreed that the writ petition may be decided finally at the admission stage.2. Mahabir Sugar Mills,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2004

Nandganj Sihori Sugar Company Limited, Through Its Executive Director ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-16-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court Procedure Rules, 1967 - Rules 19, 21 and 23

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC627

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh D. Khare, Adv.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. This petition is directed against award dated 31.7.1996 passed by Labour Court, Varanasi in Adjudication Case No. 19/1990.2. Heard Sri Rajesh D Khare, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 17 2006

Sidheswar Mishra Son of Raghunath Mishra Vs. State of U.P. Through Dir ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-17-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 21

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR695]

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Tripathi and ;S.K. Tiwari, Advs.

Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Case has been taken up in the revised list but Sri Ranjit Saxena, counsel for the respondent- Power Corporation is not present. Sri Brij Lal Verma, who is not in the panel of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2003

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Through Its General Manager Vs. Spec ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-17-2003

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 15(1) and 15(2); Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Uttar Pradesh Bar Councel Rules

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2042

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh D. Khare, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. This case was heard on 15.9.1999 by this Court and after hearing the Court has been pleased to pass the following orders:'Learned Standing Counsel has appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2003

Hari Krishan Chander Whora Vs. Additional Labour Commissioner (industr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-13-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 3 and 4; Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 6

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ358All

Advocate for Appellant : Dev Raj, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vijay Kumar Rathi, holding brief of Sri R.D. Khare, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents.2. The petitioner, by means of this writ petition under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2000

Prem Singh Vs. Engineer-in-chief, P.W.D., Lucknow and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-08-2000

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2770; [2000(87)FLR278]

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh D. Khare, Adv.

A. K. Yog, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed praying for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 23.2.1995 (Annexure-6 to the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2006

Jayanta Bandhopadhyay Son of Late Mr. J.L. Bandhopadhyay and George Oo ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-14-2006

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC871

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. V.K. Singh

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for challenging the impugned judgment and order dated14th August, 2006, rejecting the Claim Petition No. 265 of 2004 only on the ground of limitation. The learned Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2006

Smt. Anis Fatima Vs. Jagdish Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-04-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1181

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. R.D. Khare

Poonam Srivastava, J.1. This second appeal has come up for final hearing alongwith Writ Petition No. 32294 of 1990.2. The writ petition was filed challenging the orders dated 20.4.1989 and 17.5.1990 in Original Suit No. 1081...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2004

Angoori Devi Vs. Pooran Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2004

Subject : LimitationProperty

Acts : U.P.C.L.H. Act - Sections 49

Reported in : AIR2004All273; 2004(2)AWC1312; (2004)2UPLBEC1847

Advocate for Appellant : R.D. Khare, ;Paras Nath Pandey, ;A.K. Sharma, ;S.N. Pandey, ;B.D. Tripathi, ;J.P. Singh, ;S.O.P. Shah, ;M.D. Singh, ;Kapoor Chand, ;Faujdar Rat, ;C.K. Rai and ;Rohit Agrawal, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The plaintiff filed a suit in the year 1978 for cancellation of a sale deed dated 24.9.1959 allegedly executed by her in favour of defendant No. 1 on the ground that it was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial