Advanced Search Results

Nishraj Traders (P.) Ltd. Vs. Madhu Viniyog (P.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(2) 394 and 394(1); Companies (Accounting Standard) Rules, 2006

Reported in : (2008)4CompLJ173(Del); [2008]86SCL116(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.D. Kashyap and ; Manisha Tyagi, Advs

ORDERS.N. Aggarwal, J.1. M/s. Nishraj Traders (P.) Ltd.' (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferor-company') and 'M/s Madhu Viniyog (P.) Ltd.' (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferee-company') have jointly filed this petition under Sections 391(2)...

In Re: Sunehari Financial Services (P.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(2), 394 and 394(1); Companies (Accounting Standard) Rules, 2006

Reported in : [2009]89SCL235(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Kr. Goel,; R.D. Kashyap and; Manisha Tyagi, Advs

ORDERS.N. Aggarwal, J.1. 'M/s. Sunehari Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.' (hereinafter to be referred as the 'transferor-company') and 'M/s. Sunehari Exports Ltd.' (hereinafter to be referred as the 'transferee-company') have jointly filed this petition under Sections 391(2)...

In Re: Ufo Moviez Ltd.; in Re: Ufo India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394

Reported in : [2008]146CompCas453(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : M.G. Ramachandran and; P. Nagesh, Advs

S.N. Aggarwal, J.1. Both these petitions are proposed to be disposed of by this common order. The petition being Co. P. No. 61 of 2008 has been filed by M/s. UFO Moviez Ltd. (hereinafter to be...

Webneuron Services Ltd. Vs. Monster.Com (India) (P.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(2) and 394; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas61(Delhi); [2008]85SCL35(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.D. Kashyap, Dy. ROC in Party-in-Perso; Vikrant Rohilla and;

ORDERS.N. Aggarwal, J.1. Webneuron Services Ltd. ('the transferor company') has filed this petition under Sections 391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking approval to the scheme of the amalgamation with Monster.com (India) (P.) Ltd....

In Re: Hindustan Hydel Projects (P.) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 394 and 394(1); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Reported in : [2008]86SCL102(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajeev Goel, Adv; R.D. Kashyap, Adv; Manisha Tyagi, A

ORDERVipin Sanghi, J.1. This is a petition under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Hindustan Hydel Projects Pvt. Ltd. (applicant/transferor company No. 1) and Shantikunj Investments Pvt....

In Re: Siel Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 100, 101, 102, 103, 103(1) and 189; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 85

Reported in : [2008]144CompCas469(Delhi); [2009]89SCL434(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Anuradha Dutt, Adv; Manisha Tyagi, Adv; R.D. Kashyap, D

Rekha Sharma, J.1. This order shall dispose of this petition under Sections 101, 102 and 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking reduction of share capital of the petitioner-company, Siel Ltd. up to an amount of...

P.C. William and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(3)SLJ264CAT

1. These are two connected O.As. which can conveniently be decided together as the relief sought in the second O.A. is dependent on the fate of the first O.A. (No. 7/97).2. Briefly stated the facts of...

Jagdish Parshad Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.109/2012 15th April, 2014 ......Appellant % JAGDISH PARSHAD Through: None. VERSUS STATE & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Nirmal Singh Berchhiwal, Adv.R-4. Mr. Vinod...