Advanced Search Results
Commissioner, Sales Tax Vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Allahabad
Sep-13-1999
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948
[2000]119STC330(All)
R.D. Gupta, Standing Counsel
P.K. Jain, J.1. Heard Sri R.D. Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the revisionist and Sri Bharatji Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee.In all the four revisions common questions of law and facts are involved....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another Vs. Municipal Mazd ...
Mumbai
Aug-08-2012
Education
Oral Judgment: The litigation background- 1 Petitioner No.1, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (for short, “Corporation”) is a statutory authority established under the provisions of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (for short, the MMC Act)....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.D. Gupta Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Allahabad
Aug-29-2001
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 309; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 49
2001(4)AWC2763; (2002)1UPLBEC345
Mona Rajvanshi, ;N.C. Rajvanshi and ;Manoj Kumar Rajvanshi, Advs.
R. K. Agrawal, J. 1. Sri R.D. Gupta, a practicing advocate of thisCourt has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Present : Mr. Akshay Bhan Senior Advocate with Vs. U.T. Chandigarh and ...
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-07-2014
Land Acquisition
Verma Sunil 2014.04.11 15:34 Crl. Misc. No.19954 of 2012 and Criminal Appeal No.S. 991 -SB of 2000 Ram Karan versus State of Punjab Present : Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sawaran Tiwana, Advocate for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChairman of the Board of Trustees of the Port, Visakhapatnam Port Trus ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-04-2003
ArbitrationLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 119; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14(2) and 30
2003(6)ALD562; 2004(1)ALT195; 2004(1)ARBLR319(AP)
K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv.
P.S. Narayana, J. 1. The petitioner, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Port of Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Visakhapatnam, had filed the present O.P. under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSube Singh Bahmani and ors. Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Sep-16-1999
Service
Punjab Financial Commission Officers(Group B) Service Rules, 1986 - Rules 9(3) and 11; Punjab Financial Commission Class III Rules, 1957 - Rules 7(2) and 11(C); Punjab Civil Secretariat(State Service, Class III) Rules, 1952 - Rules 6; Punjab Civil Secretariat(State Service Class II) Rules, 1963 - Rules 8 and 10; Haryana Secretariat Service(Group-A) Rules, 1979
JT1999(7)SC53; 1999(5)SCALE587; (1999)8SCC213; [1999]Supp2SCR562
D.D. Thakur,; Rajiv Dhawan,; H.N. Salve,;
M. Jagannadha Rao, J. 1. Leave granted in special leave petitions. 2. These three appeals arise out of the dispute between general candidates and reserved candidates in Haryana in regard to their seniority. The appellants are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask(1) Rsa No.4327 of 2011(Oandm) Vs. Haryana State Agricultural Marketin ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-06-2014
Land Acquisition
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) Rs.No.4327 of 2011(O&M) Date of decision: 06.03.2014 Gomti Prashad ......Appellant(s) Versus The Gram Panchayat & others ......Respondent(s) (2) Rs.No.4328 of 2011(O&M) Gomti Prashad ......Appellant(s) Versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Govind Mahato and Sri Baikunth Vs. Asstt/Dy. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ranchi
Aug-10-2006
Land Acquisition
(2007)108ITD506Ranchi
1. These thirteen appeals are by the two assessees against the same orders of the Id. CIT (A), Ranchi dated 18.9.2002 & 19.9.2002 for I.T.A No. 445-450/P/2002 and dated 30.9.2002, 19.9.2002 & 17.9.2002 respectively for I.T.A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Aug-11-2000
ConstitutionSales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade-tax Rules, Rules 3A, 4, 84 and 84(1)
2000(4)AWC2796
Ashok Kumar and ;Kunwar Saksena, Advs.
M. Katju and Onkareshwar Bhatt, JJ.1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar and Sri Kunwar Saksena learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Pradeep Kumar Gupta, additional chief standing counsel and Sri R. D. Gupta learned standing counsel.2. Writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaryana State Electricity Board Vs. State of Punjab and Haryana and or ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-1972
Service
Punjab Service of Engineers (Electricity Branch) (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1939 - Rule 7-A; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1972SC2516; 1973LabIC1; (1974)3SCC96
A.N. Grover, J.1. This is an appeal by Special Leave from a Judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. One of the main points relates to the interpretation of Rule 7A of the Punjab Service...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »