Advanced Search Results
Ratan Udyog Vs. Income-tax Officer and anr.
Allahabad
Mar-24-1977
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40A(3) and 185; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1977]109ITR1(All)
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
D.M. Chandrashekhar, J. 1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash certain proceedings of the Income-tax Officer. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhote Lal Jaiswal Vs. the Sales Tax Officer and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-03-1976
Sales Tax
[1977]40STC599(All)
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
Chandrashekhar, J.1. In this petition the petitioner has challenged the proceedings for recovery of arrears of sales tax for the assessment year 1957-58. Sri R.C. Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishori Lal Rakesh Kumar Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax
Allahabad
Jan-17-1985
Sales Tax
[1985]59STC323(All)
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
Om Prakash, J. 1. The applicant, hereinafter referred to as the assessee, admittedly, carried on business as an unregistered dealer in the assessment year 1973-74. The Sales Tax Officer, therefore, imposed a penalty on the assessee...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Rashida Khatoon and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-27-2004
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 170
2006ACJ1461; 2006(1)AWC471
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
Pradeep Kant and Rajiv Sharma, JJ.1. This first appeal from order arises out of an award passed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.2. The brief facts which gave rise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRammoo Mal and Sons Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax
Allahabad
Jan-22-1987
Sales Tax
[1987]66STC41(All)
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
R.R. Misra, J.1. This revision is directed against an order dated 10th March, 1986 passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Meerut Bench, Meerut. During the assessment year 1981-82 the appellant dealt with jharu and chatai, etc....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Dev Prakash and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Jan-10-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 381
2003CriLJ2882
R.C. Sharma, Asstt. Adv. General
Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. Respondents were challenged and tried for having committed offences under Section 381 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Dev Prakash respondent No. 1 is working as helper in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayashankar Mulshankar and anr. Vs. Mayabhai Lalbhai
Mumbai
Jul-31-1951
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12 and 12(2)
AIR1952Bom122; (1952)54BOMLR11; ILR1952Bom514
B.J. Diwan and ;B.G. Thakore, Advs.
Chagla, C.J.[1] The question that we have to consider in this Full Bench is whether the time that elapses between the pronouncement of the judgment and the signing of the decree should be excluded under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatpal Kishanlal Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Allahabad
Feb-12-1982
Sales Tax
[1983]53STC115(All)
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
V.K. Mehrotra, J. 1. In this revision under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, theapplicant-dealer has challenged the order imposing a penalty upon him under Section 15-A(1)(c) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsstt. Cit Vs. Manick Chand Damani
Delhi
Jul-18-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)72TTJ(Del)675
D. Dasgupta, for the Revenue; S. Bagchi, for the assesse
ORDERR.C. Sharma, A.M.This appeal by the revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), dated 20-7-1995, for the assessment year 1992-93. Following are the three grounds of appeal:'1. For that on the facts and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirdhari and ors. Vs. State
Rajasthan
Jun-18-1958
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 58
AIR1959Raj289; 1959CriLJ1475
R.C. Sharma, Adv.
ORDERK.K. Sharma, J. 1. These are two applications for revision one from Jail by Girdhari and the other by the three applicants through their counsel, against their conviction under Section 379 and a sentence of six...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »