Advanced Search Results

The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. the Alagappa Cotton Mills

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Companies Act

Reported in : AIR2001Bom429; 2001(4)ALLMR371; 2001(44)ARBLR211(Bom); 2001(4)BomCR507; (2001)4BOMLR34; 2001(3)MhLj415

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Shah and ;U.M. Mahajan, Advs. i/b Divekar & Co.

J.A. Patil, J. 1. This is a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 15,43,633,84/- with future interest thereon, the plaintiffs case in brief is as follows :-2. The plaintiffs are a Company registered under...

income Tax Officer Vs. Vikram Proteins (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(JP.)822

1. This is an appeal filed by the Department against the order of the learned CIT(A) dt. 21st July, 2,003, for the asst. yr. 2001-02. The assessee has also filed the cross-objection. On the facts and...

Janakalyan Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. Windmill Hotels Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 439 and 443(2); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91 and 101

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas311(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Shah and ;Rajesh Nagory, Advs., i/b., V. Deshpande and Co.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner is a co-operative bank registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. It has prayed for an order under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, to wind...

B.N. Chandra and Co. Vs. Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR239; (1994)96BOMLR236

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Shah, Adv. and ;H.C. Parekh, Adv., i/b., Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co.

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to set aside the Award dated 2nd March, 1991 filed in this Court and numbered as 'Award No. 70 of 1991'.2. The petitioners are wholesale dealers in...

Shri Birju Batran Vs. M/S. Phoenix Mills Ltd. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2-A

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR540; 1998(2)BomCR445

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Shah, Adv.

ORDERF.I. Rebello, J. 1. Rule. Respondent No. 1 waives service. By consent heard forthwith.In the instant case the petitioner joined the services in the year 1961. His services came to be terminated along with other workmen...

Flowfast Engineers (India) Vs. D and H Secheron Electrodes Pvt. Ltd. a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilContract

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 46; Indian Partnership Act; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Municipal Rules

Reported in : AIR2005Bom204; 2005(2)BomCR497; 2005(2)MhLj482; [2005]64SCL559(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Shah, ;Mili Thakkar and ;H.J. Engineer, Advs. i/b., Gordhandas and ;Fozdar, Advs.

Shah S.K., J.1. The plaintiffs filed this suit for specific performance of the oral agreement dated 30-11-1977 for purchase of Basement-cum-godown premises as described in Exhibit 'A' annexed to the plaint. 2. The plaintiffs are a...

Synbiotics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(112)ELT97Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The above is an applications were filed for waiver of deposit of duty of Rs. 4.58 crores and penalty Rs. 1 crore. In the beginning when the matter was taken up for hearing it was...

N.K. Proteins Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)83TTJ(Ahd.)904

1. All these concerns and persons belong to a group known as "N K Group". The proceedings of search were conducted in this case on 24th Feb., 1999. The main grounds raised in all these appeals...

Haryana Coach Body Builders Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. This appeal by assessee is directed against order of revision under Section 263 of learned CIT, Rohtak dated 29-3-2005. The learned Commissioner held that the assessing officer has passed the order without proper consideration of...

Jaikisandas Balchand Pamnani and Another Vs. Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 206; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 66 and 90; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1991Bom341

Advocate for Appellant : : R.C. Shah, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution impugns an auction sale in exercise of the power vested in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay vis-a-vis S. 206 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act being...