Advanced Search Results
Bishan Lal Kanodia Vs. Cit
Delhi
Dec-21-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)173CTR(Del)496
Salil Aggarwal, for the assessed R.C. Pandey with Ajay Jha, for the Revenue
S.B. Sinha, C.J.Reference to this court has been made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal'), for its opinion in relation to the following questions :'1. Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mahesh Kumar Modi
Delhi
Feb-06-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 9
[2004]266ITR192(Delhi)
R.C. Pandey, Adv
D. K. Jain J. 1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ('the Tribunal' for short), has referred under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPyar Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-05-2006
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1997 - Sections 29; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 303, 304, 304(1), 304(2), 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 397, 450 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 22 and 22(1); Madhya Pradesh Legal Services Authorities Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 33 and 33(2)
2006CriLJ1354; 2006(2)MPHT331; 2006(1)MPLJ395
R.C. Pandey, Adv.
ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. This is a revision under Sections 397, 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short hereinafter referred as Code), challenging the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain and Special Judge (NDPS Act),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Commissioner of Income-tax Delhi-ii Vs. M/S. Riviera Apartments Co ...
Delhi
Feb-19-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184 and 256(2); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4 and 22
2001IIIAD(Delhi)460; (2001)167CTR(Del)501
Mr. R.C. Pandey, Sr. Standing Counsel and; Mr. Prem Lata Bansal, Jr. Standing Counse
ORDERD.K.Jain, J.1. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), at the instance of Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench-E ('the Tribunal' in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Monark P. Ltd.
Delhi
Feb-16-1994
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35B, 35B(1) and 35B(1)
(1994)119CTR(Del)112; 1994(29)DRJ183; [1994]208ITR396(Delhi)
R.C. Pandey &; D.C. Taneja, Advs
D.K. Jain, J. 1. In these references, at the instance of the Revenue, relevant to the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred to this court, the following common question of law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAll India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Nov-17-1998
Direct Taxation
Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, Sections 87 and 92; Constitution of India, Article 14 and Entry 82, List I of Seventth Schedule
(1999)151CTR(Del)1; [1998]236ITR1(Delhi); [1998]101TAXMAN401(Delhi)
G.C Sharma, P.S. Sarin, R.K Sanghi Amit P. Deshpande and Mrs. Lakshmi Iyengar, for the Petitioner Madan Lokur, Neeraj Kaul, R.C. Pandey and Ms.
Lahoti, J.All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, the petitioner, is a registered body having individual members from all over the country and also represents many associations having the object of protecting the interests of tax payers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vinay Bharat Ram and Sons (Huf) and ors ...
Delhi
Nov-20-2002
PropertyDirect Taxation
Delhi Rent Control Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 23 and 260A
(2003)179CTR(Del)31; [2003]261ITR632(Delhi)
R.C. Pandey and; Ajay Jha, Advs
D.K. Jain, J.1. These eight appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for short the Act), are directed against the orders passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (Tribunal for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax and ors. Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Associati ...
Delhi
Aug-11-2000
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 188 and 256(1)
(2001)168CTR(Del)534; [2001]248ITR258(Delhi)
R.C. Pandey and; Prem Lata Bansal, Advs
D.K. Jain, J. 1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') has referred the following questionunder Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax and ors. Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Associati ...
Delhi
Aug-11-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)165CTR(Del)207
R.C. Pandey; with Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Revenu; M.S. Syali;with Satyen Sethi; & Mallikarjun,
D.K. Jain, . J.At the instance of the revenue , the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') has referred the following question under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Surjan Singh,
Delhi
Oct-10-2002
Direct Taxation
Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(10), 2(14) and 256(1); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 1(2), 2(52) and 507
(2002)178CTR(Del)547; 101(2002)DLT21; [2003]260ITR351(Delhi)
R.C. Pandey,; R.D. Jolly,; Prem Lata Bansal and;
D.K. Jain, J. 1. In these ten references, at the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short the Tribunal) has referred under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »