Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r c pandey · Page 1 of about 273 results (0.762 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 21 2001

Bishan Lal Kanodia Vs. Cit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)173CTR(Del)496

Advocate for Appellant : Salil Aggarwal, for the assessed R.C. Pandey with Ajay Jha, for the Revenue

S.B. Sinha, C.J.Reference to this court has been made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal'), for its opinion in relation to the following questions :'1. Whether,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2003

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mahesh Kumar Modi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-06-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 9

Reported in : [2004]266ITR192(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey, Adv

D. K. Jain J. 1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ('the Tribunal' for short), has referred under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2006

Pyar Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-05-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1997 - Sections 29; Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 303, 304, 304(1), 304(2), 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 397, 450 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 22 and 22(1); Madhya Pradesh Legal Services Authorities Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 33 and 33(2)

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1354; 2006(2)MPHT331; 2006(1)MPLJ395

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey, Adv.

ORDERS.C. Vyas, J.1. This is a revision under Sections 397, 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short hereinafter referred as Code), challenging the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ujjain and Special Judge (NDPS Act),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 19 2001

The Commissioner of Income-tax Delhi-ii Vs. M/S. Riviera Apartments Co ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-19-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 184 and 256(2); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4 and 22

Reported in : 2001IIIAD(Delhi)460; (2001)167CTR(Del)501

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.C. Pandey, Sr. Standing Counsel and; Mr. Prem Lata Bansal, Jr. Standing Counse

ORDERD.K.Jain, J.1. Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'), at the instance of Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench-E ('the Tribunal' in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1994

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Monark P. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-16-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 35B, 35B(1) and 35B(1)

Reported in : (1994)119CTR(Del)112; 1994(29)DRJ183; [1994]208ITR396(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey &; D.C. Taneja, Advs

D.K. Jain, J. 1. In these references, at the instance of the Revenue, relevant to the assessment years 1975-76 and 1976-77, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred to this court, the following common question of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1998

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-17-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, Sections 87 and 92; Constitution of India, Article 14 and Entry 82, List I of Seventth Schedule

Reported in : (1999)151CTR(Del)1; [1998]236ITR1(Delhi); [1998]101TAXMAN401(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : G.C Sharma, P.S. Sarin, R.K Sanghi Amit P. Deshpande and Mrs. Lakshmi Iyengar, for the Petitioner Madan Lokur, Neeraj Kaul, R.C. Pandey and Ms.

Lahoti, J.All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, the petitioner, is a registered body having individual members from all over the country and also represents many associations having the object of protecting the interests of tax payers...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2002

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vinay Bharat Ram and Sons (Huf) and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-20-2002

Subject : PropertyDirect Taxation

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 23 and 260A

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Del)31; [2003]261ITR632(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey and; Ajay Jha, Advs

D.K. Jain, J.1. These eight appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for short the Act), are directed against the orders passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (Tribunal for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2000

Commissioner of Income-tax and ors. Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Associati ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 11, 188 and 256(1)

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Del)534; [2001]248ITR258(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey and; Prem Lata Bansal, Advs

D.K. Jain, J. 1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') has referred the following questionunder Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2000

Commissioner of Income Tax and ors. Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Associati ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Del)207

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey; with Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Revenu; M.S. Syali;with Satyen Sethi; & Mallikarjun,

D.K. Jain, . J.At the instance of the revenue , the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') has referred the following question under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2002

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Surjan Singh,

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(10), 2(14) and 256(1); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 1(2), 2(52) and 507

Reported in : (2002)178CTR(Del)547; 101(2002)DLT21; [2003]260ITR351(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Pandey,; R.D. Jolly,; Prem Lata Bansal and;

D.K. Jain, J. 1. In these ten references, at the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short the Tribunal) has referred under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial