Advanced Search Results

Damodar Mohanlal Thakkar and ors. Vs. Maharashtra State Co-operative A ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91 and 94(3)

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR945

Advocate for Appellant : N. Raja and ; D.H. Mehta, Advs.

S.C. Pratap, J.1. One Suryaprabhadevi Nandkishore Singhal, respondent No. 4 herein filed an application, being Arbitration Case No. ABN/1335 of 1976, before the Second Co-operative Court for Greater Bombay under section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative...

Ebrahim Currim and Sons Vs. Regional P.F. Commissioner and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Fund Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2A

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR246; (1994)ILLJ369Bom

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Nerlekar, Adv.

ORDERD.R. Dhanuka, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the validity of Order dated January 25, 1988, passed by respondent No. 1 holding that Messrs. Ebrahim...

In Re: Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 78, 100 to 104, 235 to 251 and 391 to 394

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR836; (2004)3CompLJ380(Bom); [2004]55SCL680(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv. and ;S.A. Divan, Adv., i/b., Crawford Bayley and Co.;S.R. Kom, Adv.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present company petition has been filed by the company known as the Morarjee Goculdas Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd., a company deemed to be incorporated under the Companies Act and...

Pragati Metal Works Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employee's Provident Fund Act, 1952 - Sections 1(3), 7A, 16(1) and 17-B; Apprentices Act, 1961

Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR555; (2001)3BOMLR228; [2001(89)FLR981]; 2001(4)MhLj646

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. Ramswamy and ;Mr. P.L. Naik, Advs.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioner Company is aggrieved by the order dated 18th May, 1994 passed by the respondent. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, under Section 7(A) of the Employee's Provident Fund Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred...

Pragati Metal Works Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1 and 16(1)

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR295; (2001)IILLJ55Bom

Advocate for Appellant : P. Ramaswamy and ;P.L. Naik, Advs.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner company is aggrieved by the order dated May 18, 1994 passed by the respondent, Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, under Section 7-A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952...

Union of India and Another Vs. Commander Uday Date and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 80(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 198 - Sections 96; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Merchant Shipping Act, 1986 - Sections 5, 17, 79, 78, 80, 84 and 86-A; Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976; Income-tax Act, 1922; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 297; Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47(3) and 217(2); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Saurashtra Rent Control Act - Sections 13(1); Bombay Rent Act - Sections 51

Reported in : AIR1998Bom157; 1998(2)ALLMR207; 1998(1)BomCR214

Advocate for Appellant : R.A. Dada, Addl. Solicitor-General, ;S.M. Shah, ;R.C. Master, ;Mrs, S.V. Bharucha, Advs. i/by ;H.D. Rathod, ;Virendra Tulzapurkar, ;Shyam Mehta and ;Satendra Kumar, Advs.

ORDERM.B. Shah, C.J.1. These appeals are filed against the judgment and order dated 5th/6th December, 1996 passed by the learned Single Judge, directing the appellants to grant Certificates of Service as provided under section 80(1) of...

Union of India Vs. Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1991LC321(Bombay); 1992(58)ELT38(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.C. Master and ;Mr. H.V. Mehta, Advs.

Bharucha, J. 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned single Judge making the writ petition filed by the respondents to the appeal absolute. 2. The respondents manufacture starter armatures which...

Union of India Vs. Sampat Raj Dugar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(26), 23(2), 110, 111, 112 and 122

Reported in : 1991LC174(Bombay); 1991(56)ELT739(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.C. Master, Adv.

Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. This is an appeal against the order in Writ Petition No. 85 of 1987 by which the order of the Collector being order dated 15th September 1986 confiscating the goods mentioned therein was quashed,...

Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR319; [2004]118CompCas337(Bom); (2004)1CompLJ447(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Master, Panel Counsel, i/b., H.D. Rathod for Regional Director, Department of Company Affairs, Mumbai;Berjis Colabawala and ;P. Sekseria, ;Ajay Vazirani and ;Yatish Ghadiyali, Advs. and ;N. Dhil

D.G. Karnik, J.1. The petitioner herein Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited, has two wholly owned subsidiary companies viz. Saurashtra Paints Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'first transferor company') and GNP (Madras) Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'second...

In Re: Zee Telefilms Limited; in Re: Programme Asia Trading Company Li ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 209(5), 211(7), 212(9), 217(5), 235 to 251, 307(7), 391 and 391(2)

Reported in : [2005]125CompCas297(Bom); [2006]68SCL72(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Master, Adv. for Regional Director, Department of Company Affairs and ;K.V. Gautam, Deputy Official Liquidator;J.J. Bhatt and ;V.C. Khatri, Advs., i/b., DSK Legal

1. Heard Mr. Bhatt for the appellants in both the appeals. Mr. Master is present for the Regional Director, Department of Company Affairs.2.Both the appeals are filed against the order passed by the learned single judge...