Advanced Search Results
Ram Kesh Son of Sri Dev Narayan and Dev Narayan Son of Sri Shiv Brat V ...
Allahabad
Mar-29-2005
ServiceCivil
Life Insurance Corporation Regulation, 1960 - Regulation 4
(2005)2UPLBEC1910
R.C. Gupta, Adv.
Sanjay Misra, J.1. Heard Sri R.C. Gupta for the petitioners and Sri A.K. Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 19/21.12.2001...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShobh Nath and anr. Vs. District Manager, Food Corporation of India an ...
Allahabad
Apr-05-2004
Labour and Industrial
[2004(102)FLR659]; (2004)3UPLBEC2381
R.C. Gupta, Adv.
Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 14.6.2002 passed by Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Lucknow, Respondent No. 2, whereby the application of Petitioner No. 2 Jai Ram for appointment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShushil Singh Vs. District Magistrate and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-07-2003
CriminalConstitution
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3 and 8; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)
2003CriLJ1854
R.C. Gupta, Learned Counsel
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-detenu Shushil Singh has impugned the order dated 22-9-2002 passed by the first respondent Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raja Ram Vs. District Manager, Food Corporation of India and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-14-2004
Labour and Industrial
2005(1)ESC417; [2005(105)FLR496]
R.C. Gupta, Adv.
Vineet Saran, J.1. Nankoo Ram, father of the petitioner, was a Handling Labourer in the Food Corporation of India, Agra. In terms of the Circular of the Food Corporation of India, dated 3.7.1996, Nankoo Ram applied...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagdamba General Store and Another Vs. Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Allahabad
May-25-1998
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 38, Rule 5
1998(3)AWC2086
K.K. Arora and ;R.C. Gupta, Advs.
D.K. Seth, J.1. In the present case, an application under Order IX. Rule 13 was allowed by setting aside ex parte decree passed in Suit No. 634 of 1988. Against the said order dated 30.9.1995 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHari Krishna Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-23-1996
CivilLimitation
Limitation Act - Sections 5
1997(1)MPLJ322
R.C. Gupta, Adv.
ORDERT.S. Doabia, J.1. Shri R. C. Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner.On my asking Shri V. K. Sharma, Adv. appearing for respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3.Heard.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the court below...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-29-1988
Criminal
Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 17, 17(3), 18 and 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 332
1990CriLJ409
R.C. Gupta, Adv.
Palok Basu, J.1. This Full Bench has been constituted to resolve the conflict in the two decisions, one in writ petition No. 9475 of 1986 Kripa Shankar v. District Magistrate, Gorakhpur and others, and the other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahak Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Apr-09-1999
ConstitutionFood Adulteration
Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 5A, 6, 95(1) and (2) and 110; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Computation of Period of 5 Years for Removal of Disqualification, etc.) Rules, 1994 - Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up- Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rules 3 to 6, 6(3) and (6) and 7; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107, 116 and 433; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 55, 182, 294, 302, 323, 324, 452 and 506; Public Gambling Act - Sections 13; Uttar Pradesh Excise Act - Sections 60; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7 and 16; Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 8; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 19F; Uttar Pradesh P
1999(3)AWC1838; (1999)2UPLBEC1336
R.C. Gupta, Adv.
O.P. Garg, J. 1. The petitioner-Mahak Singh was elected as Pradhan of the Gram Panchayat, Tana. Tehsil Kairana, district Muzaffarnagar in the year 1995. A complaint was made against him by the co-villagers, namely. Harpal Singh,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Laxmi Stores
Rajasthan
Oct-29-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)172CTR(Raj)548
L.M. Lodha, for the Revenue Vineet Kothari, for the Assessee
By the CourtWe have heard Mr. L.M. Lodha, learned counsel for the revenue.2. This is a reference application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of the department.3. The respondent assessee firm...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. the Nagpur Electric Light and Power Co. L ...
Mumbai
Dec-19-1960
ConstitutionCriminal
Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 367; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 94 and 96; Evidence Act - Sections 131; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(42); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 175 and 420; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 152
AIR1961Bom242; (1961)63BOMLR559; [1961]31CompCas324(Bom); ILR1961Bom508
G.R. Mudholkar, Asstt. Special Govt. Pleader
Tarkunde, J.1. These criminal references arise from 19 criminal cases filed by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation against the Nagpur Electric Light and Power Company, limited, hereafter referred to as the Company, for alleged evasion of octroi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »