Advanced Search Results
Alak Prokash JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-16-1971
CompanyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 237, 388B to 388E and 398; ;Companies Tribunal (Abolition Act), 1967
[1973]43CompCas68(Cal)
R.C. Deb, ;Subrata Roy Choudhury, ;P.L. Khaitan and ;Mahabir Prosad Chowdhury, Advs.
B.C. Mitra, J. 1. The appellant was a director of several joint stock companies incorporated in India, including a company known as BenettColeman and Co. Ltd. He claims to have resigned from the directorship of this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJabbalpore Electric Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. the Madhya Pradesh Electricity ...
Kolkata
May-02-1974
Electricity
Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 29, 34 and 47
AIR1974Cal309
R.C. Deb, ;Subrata Roy Chaudhury, ;Biswarup Gupta and ;Surit Roy Chaudhury, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, C.J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment of P. K. Banerjee, J., delivered on May 9, 1972, on an application of the appellant under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging certain...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaridas Mundra Vs. National and Grindlays Bank Ltd.
Kolkata
Jul-31-1962
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Section 176; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 54
AIR1963Cal132,67CWN58
R.C. Deb and ;S. Mukharji, Advs.
Bachawat, J. 1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a decree dis-missing his suit, claiming a perpetual Injunction restraining the defendant banking company from selling the shares pledged by him with the defendant. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
SerajuddIn and Co. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-07-1973
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Section 13; ;Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 54; ;Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 1949 - Rule 28-A
AIR1974Cal296,78CWN61
R.C. Deb, ;Dipankar Gupta, ;P.K. Sen and ;Sukumar Basu, Advs.
B.C. Mitra, J.1. On December 3, 1949. the first respondent invited applications for grant of a mining lease under the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 (hereafter referred to as the 1949 Rules). These Rules were framed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshoka Marketing Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kolkata
Aug-06-1965
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 237 and 249(1)
[1967]37CompCas341(Cal),70CWN472
R.C. Deb, ;Subrata Roy Choudhary and ;Biswarup Gupta, Advs.
B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner-company claims to carry on business as exporter, investor and financier and further claims to have been acting as selling agent for the State Trading Corporation in respect of cement and also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahu JaIn Ltd. Vs. Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Finance and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-06-1965
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 237
[1966]36CompCas543(Cal),70CWN399
R.C. Deb, ;Subrata Roy Chowdhury and ;Biswarup Gupta, Advs.;S. Chowdhury, ;B.N. Sen and ;B.C. Basak, Advs.
Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner-company claims to carry on business as managing agent of certain public limited companies, namely, Rohtas Industries Ltd., New Central Jute Mills Co. Ltd., Jaipur Udyog Ltd., Bharat Collieries Ltd., S.K.G. Sugar Ltd.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLatika Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner, Co ...
Kolkata
Apr-26-1979
PropertyCivil
Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951; ;Calcutta Municipal Rules - Rules 51, 52, 56 and 57(2)
AIR1980Cal17,83CWN829
R.C. Deb, ;N.C. Roy Chowdhury and ;D.K. Mitra, Advs.
ORDERG.N. Ray, J.1. In the instant Rule the petitioners challenge the legality and validity of the notice and/or letter dated 5/7-6-1976 and pray for writs directing the respondents namely the Corporation of Calcutta and its officers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmala Bala Ghosh and ors. Vs. Balai Chand Ghosh and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-05-1975
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17; ;Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Section 42
AIR1975Cal404
R.C. Deb and ;Madhusudan Banerjee, Advs. (in F.A. No. 491 of 1962), ;Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Rathina Bhattacharya, Advs. (in F.A. No. 492 of 1962)
Sen Gupta, J. 1. The application for amendment of the plaint filed by Balaichand Ghosh plaintiff-respondent No. 1 is before us for consideration. The said prayer has strenuously been contested by the defendants-appellants. 2. To understand...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSambhu Charan Nundy Vs. Gopi Mohan Bhattacharjee
Kolkata
Apr-02-1951
Contempt of CourtCivil
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 1 and 3; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3
AIR1951Cal507
R.C. Deb, Adv.
B.P. Mukharji, J.1. This is the deft's. appln. for committing the pltfs. Sambhu Charan Nundy & Nilmoni Nundy for contempt & for varying and discharging the undertakings given by the deft, appct. under the consent decree....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Sri Jagannath Jew (Through Shebaits) Vs. Commissioner of Income-ta ...
Kolkata
May-14-1969
Direct Taxation
Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(3), 9 and 12
[1971]81ITR353(Cal)
R.C. Deb, Adv.
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J. 1. What is the effect of the will dated 21st February, 1887, executed by late Raja Rajendra Mullick That is the main question that requires determination in this reference arising out of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »