Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r b pendharkar · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.102 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 19 2006

Arvind Wamanrao Pendharkar (Deceased) (Through L.Rs. Sow. Sunita Arvin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-19-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 1981 - Rules 11, 40 and 41; Maharashtra Civil Services (Pay) Rules 1982 - Rule 11; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 39 and 226

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR287; 2006(5)MhLj85

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Sr. Adv. and ;S.P. Hedaoo, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. After the matter was closed on 19th June 2006, on 20th June 2006, the learned Senior Advocate with Shri Hedaoo, Advocate appeared and made a request to grant him further hearing in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2006

A.S. Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. Central India Spinning, Weaving and Ma ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-06-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 2, 2(15), 3(1), 3(2), 3(30), 3(38), 11, 12, 12(31), 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 19(2), 23, 23(1), 23B, 27A, 28(1), 30, 32, 33, 33A, 42, 42(2), 42(4), 44, 50A, 58, 71, 72, 73(1), 73(2), 73(3), 73A, 76, 79(1), 80 and 83A; Bar Councils Act - Sections 8, 14 and 14(1); Bombay Shops Establishment Act; Trade Union Act, 1926; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1947; Bombay Industrial Relations (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1964; Legal Practitioners' Act - Sections 4; Bombay Industrial Relations Rules - Rules 37 and 40; Insolvency Rules - Rule 128; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 17, Rule 2; The Bombay Industrial Relation Rules, 1947 - Rules 10 and 11; Consitution of India - Articles 14 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR601; 2007(2)BomCR147

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Sr. Adv. and ;Sambhare, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Petitioners before this Court have challenged the order passed by Member, Industrial Court dated 16th Oct. 1995 below exhibit 28 in Reference (ICN) 4/1978, holding that the Petitioners have no legal right or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1996

Mannlal S/O Ramprasad Yadao Vs. Presiding Officer, Second Labour Court ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrail Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11-A; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 78; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 294 and 353; Constitution of India - Articles 277 and 311(1); Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 14(3); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; States Reorganisation Act, 1956

Reported in : 1998(1)BomCR119

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Adv.

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. The petitioner, a dismissed driver of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation' for short), has herein challenged the award passed by the Labour Court affirming the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 07 2006

Natural Sugar and Allied Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Razzak S/O Hazi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-07-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 11, 24, 25, 34, 155, 177, 179, 190, 193, 406, 409, 415 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 177, 178, 181(4), 182(1), 184, 184(4), 223 and 482; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 202

Reported in : 2006CriLJ3680; 2006(4)MhLj771

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Sr. Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties. Shri M. M. Agnihotri, learned Counsel waives notices on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and Shri K. S. Dhote,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

Lalchand Govindrao Dhoke Vs. Industrial Court, Maharashtra Nagpur Benc ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 28 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F

Reported in : 2006(2)BomCR886; [2005(106)FLR1081]; 2005(3)MhLj497

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Senior Counsel and ;G. Venkataraman, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner employee challenges the part of the order of Industrial Court dated 9-9-1992, by which the learned Member, Industrial Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1987

P. and T. Central Co-operative Society Ltd., Through Its Secretary and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-1987

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(21), 92(1), 94, 94(1), 94(2) and 94(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 1, Rules 1(5), 10(2) and 10(5)

Reported in : 1987(2)BomCR190; 1987MhLJ232

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar and ;S.D. Date, Advs.

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. By these two writ petitions the orders passed by the Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court, Bombay ('Appellate courts' for short) in two revision application affirming the order passed by the Co-operative Court, one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2011

Anant Ramchandra Dakshindas Vs. Divisional Joint Registrar and ors

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-08-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 227, 228, 309, 162, 13 (3), 14; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 152, 83, 88, 165; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961. - Rule 107 (5), 107 (9) and 107 (11) (k) (d),; Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Chapter 17, Rule 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 113

Advocate for Appellant : Mr R.B. Pendharkar; Mr Belsare, Advs.

1. In this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to the order dated 24.2.2009 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar (respondent no. 1) with further challenge to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2008

Dr. Narendra S/O Chirkutrao Balpande and Ramkrishna S/O Tanbaji Kale ( ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 41; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act - Sections 2(1), 31 and 34; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 5(42), 5(48) and 311; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(21), 43 and 271; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code - Sections 41, 42, 44 and 45; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 18, Rule 17

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR497; 2008(3)BomCR257; (2008)110BOMLR1065; 2008(5)MhLj420

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Sr. Adv. and ;Hedao, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. The original defendants have by this Second Appeal challenged the reversing judgment dated 22.12.1989 delivered by the IInd Additional District Judge, Nagpur in Regular Civil Appeal No. 503/1984. By that judgment while setting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 24 2008

In Re: Hariganga Alloys Steel Ltd. (In Liquidation) and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-24-2008

Subject : Company

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 7, 9, 164 and 280

Reported in : 2008BusLR33(Bom); [2009]151CompCas405(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Pendharkar, Sr. Adv., ;Belsare and ;S. Deshpande, Advs.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. These 10 Applications are moved by legal heirs of deceased workers of Hariganga Steel & Alloys Ltd. - a Company in liquidation. Their prayer is to direct Official Liquidator to pay to them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1992

Rambhau Vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-14-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ872Bom

1. The petitioner, Rambhau Vyankuji Khorgade, challenges the Award dated April 23, 1991 of the Third Labour Court, Nagpur whereunder his demand to set aside the order of termination dated April 10, 1980 was rejected holding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial