Advanced Search Results

Narsingdas Takhatmal Vs. Radhakisan Rambakas and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 92; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 9

Reported in : (1952)54BOMLR492

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Kotwal and ;N.C. Shah, Advs.

FACTS One Narsingdas (plaintiff) filed the present suit against Radhakisan, Shrikisan, Balmukund and Ramkisan (defendants l to 4) impleading therein his grandsons Bhikchand, Shivdas and Dwarkadas (defendants 5 to 7) being the sons of his daughter...

Ganesh Narayan Kulkarni Vs. Ganesh Ramchandra Joshi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 63, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 103; Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 11-A and 144; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 65 and 98

Reported in : AIR1971Bom16; (1970)72BOMLR741; ILR1971Bom1556; 1971MhLJ87

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Kotwal and ;M.R. Kotwal, Advs.

Nain, J. 1. This is an appeal by the original plaintiff against the judgment dated 18th June 1962 of the learned Second Extra Assistant Judge, Sholapur, confirming the dismissal of the suit of the plaintiff by...

Vasudeo Dagadulal and ors. Vs. Kankoochand Hirachand Visashrimali and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1951Bom226; (1950)52BOMLR774; ILR1950Bom777

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Kotwal, Adv.

Bhagwati J. 1. This second appeal raises an important question with regard to the auction purchaser's rights in respect of the undivided interest of a coparcener in specific property belonging to a coparcenery, 2. The plaintiff,...

Shankarlal Ramratan Shet Vs. Pandharinath Vishnu Phatak

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 50

Reported in : AIR1951Bom385; (1951)53BOMLR319; ILR1951Bom670

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Kotwal, Adv.

Bhagwati, J. 1. This is a second appeal from the decision of the learned Asst. Judge, Jalgaon, allowing the appeal against the decision of the learned Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, at Jalgaon. 2. The pltf....

The State Vs. Balwant Ganpati Mulye

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR87

Tarkunde, J.1. The question referred to us in these two criminal references is whether Section 129A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, which allows compulsion to be exercised for the medical examination of a person believed to...

Pandurang Mahadeo Kavade and ors. Vs. Annaji Balwant Bokil and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1971SC2228; (1971)3SCC530; 1971(III)LC311(SC)

C.A. Vaidialingam, J.1. This appeal by defendants Nos. 1 to 7 by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree dated February 14, 1963 of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 718 of...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North Vs. Walji Damji

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 12B and 42(1)

Reported in : [1955]28ITR914(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Adv.-General

1. BY this application, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay North, Kutch and Saurashtra, Ahmedabad, requires the Appellate Tribunal to refer to the High Court a question of law which is said to arise out of the...

Raojibhai Vaghjibhai Patel Vs. Karsanbhai Ratnabhai Patel

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR461

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. B. Kotwal

S.T. Desai, J.1. This is a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution by the landlord of certain lands admeasuring 42 acres 29 gunthas situate atBoroi in Sabarkantha District. Respondent No. 1 is the tenant in...

Dattatraya Vishnu Bhide Vs. Padmakar Mahadev Govitrikar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1961)63BOMLR148

Gokhale, J.1. This is a second appeal which arises in execution proceedings.. The respondent is the landlord of certain premises in Poona, while the appellant was his tenant. The landlord filed Civil Suit No. 3927 of...

Shankar Nathu Vs. Gangaram Nathu and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 3(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 22, Rules 1 and 3; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1952Bom127; (1952)54BOMLR75; ILR1952Bom485

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Kotwal, Adv.

Bhagwati, J.[1] This is a first appeal from the decision of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Divi-sion) at Jalgaon who decreed the plaintiff's suit for partition.[2] One Nathu Halwai and his two sons Gangaram and Shankar...