Advanced Search Results
Sri. S Sundaresh Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Oct-13-2017
Land Acquisition
1/125 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE13H DAY OF OCTOBER2017BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.14815/2017 (KLR-RES) Between: Sri. S. Sundaresh Son of Late Suryanarayanarao Aged about 58 years...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.V. Nanjappa Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Secretary to the Revenue D ...
Karnataka
Jan-13-2011
Land Acquisition
For the Petitioner: G.R. Anantharam and Associates, Advocate. For the Respondent: R. Om Kumar, AGA for R1 to R3, A.K. Vasanth and M.K. Girish, CVTR/R4.
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 22.9.2010 in R.A. No.11/2008-09 at annexure-v issued by the learned deputy commissioner, chamarajanagar, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijayamma Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jul-10-1981
Criminal
Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 2(18) and 92(1)
ILR1981KAR1141; 1981(2)KarLJ342
R. Anantharaman, Adv.
ORDER1. This petition is directed against the conviction and sentence passed on the petitioner by the Metropolitan Magistrate (Traffic Court-I) Bangalore City, in C.C. No. 3527 of 1980. The learned Magistrate has convicted the petitioner for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Venkataramanaswamy Vs. Ramakrishnappa
Karnataka
Nov-22-1993
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rule 29
ILR1994KAR268
Devanand, Adv. for ;R. Anantharaman, Adv.
ORDERN.D.V.Bhat, J. 1. In this Revision the petitioner has challenged the order dated 6.2.1992 passed by the Additional Second Munsiff, Bangalore District, Bangalore on I.A.No. II. By the said order, the learned Munsiff allowed I.A.No. II...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanbaxy Laboratories Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-24-1987
Land Acquisition
(1987)(12)LC323Tri(Delhi)
Shri. D.N. Mehta
1. The appellants in respect of their product Chloramphenicol Eye Ointment claimed classification under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff read with exemption notification No. 55/75-CE dated 1.3.1975 as amended by 62/78 dated 1.3.1978....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArul Murugan Traders Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. and ...
Chennai
Mar-29-1984
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126, 128, 133, 140 and 145
(1984)2MLJ375
S. Gopalaratnam, Adv.
Sathiadev, J.1. Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S. No. 163 of 1982, on file of the Sub-Court, Gobichettipalayam. It filed the suit against respondents herein, for grant of a permanent injunction restraining them from recovering the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArul Murugan Traders Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd., Bom ...
Chennai
Mar-29-1984
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - 0rder 39, Rules 1 and 2; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126
AIR1986Mad161; [1986]59CompCas399(Mad)
S. Gopalaratnam, Adv.
ORDER1. Petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S. 163 of 1982 on the file of the Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam. It filed the suit against respondents herein, for grant of a permanent injunction restraining them from recovering the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›