Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r a parikh · Page 1 of about 47 results (0.034 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 21 2006

Jitendra B. Mehta Vs. the Manager and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-21-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 78 and 79; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 11A, 25F, 25G and 25H; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR183]

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, Adv. for Petitioner 1

H.K. Rathod, J.1. By order dated 20.6.2006, this petition was disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty in favour of petitioner to approach the concerned labour court. However, pursuant to order passed by this Court today...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

T.R. Balasubramanian Vs. Shriram Scientific and Industrial Research

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 14(1), 22 and 39; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 12 - Rule 8 - Order 29; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(7)

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT763

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhanshu Batra and; Vhuvan Gugnani, Advs

Sanjiv Khanna, J.1. The appellant, Mr. T.R. Balasubramanian, has filed the present second appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958(hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and order dated 6th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1998

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Sundeep Industries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-03-1998

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(113)ELT282Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appeal has been filed against the impugned order captioned above of the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Indore. The appellants are availing of Modvat credit for their final product in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 07 2010

In Re: Europlast India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-07-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 192A, 193, 391, 391(4) and 392; Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (Finance Establishment) Act, 1999; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53; Negotiable Instrument Act - Sections 138

Advocate for Appellant : Pankaj S. Shah, Adv. for Noticee Nos. 5 and 6, ;Ram Apte, Sr. Counsel and ;A.A. Garge, Adv. for Creditor (Ashoka Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.), ;Satish Shah and ;A.C. Tamhane, Advs., i/b., Tamhane & Co. for

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This common order will dispose of all the pending applications, show cause notices and Chairman' reports.2. The background in which the present proceedings have emanated can be briefly mentioned as follows: The unsecured...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1980

Kalloomal Samaldas Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-23-1980

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1983]54STC103(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : R.R. Gupta, Adv.

A.R. Navkar, J.1. This order shall govern disposal of Misc. Civil Case No. 71 of 1980 and Misc. Civil Case No. 72 of 1980 Kalloomal Samaldas, Morena v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh in both...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2014

Dr.Alex Vergis C.George Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 04, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : March 11, 2014 + WP(C) 5598/2003 DR.ALEX VERGIS C.GEORGE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.M.K.S.Menon,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2002

Rajesh Namdeo Mhatre Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2 and 154; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 376 and 376(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 114A and 137

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)37; 2002BomCR(Cri)708; 2002(4)MhLj266

Advocate for Appellant : Prakash Naik, ;G.A. Panna, ;Manali Desai, ;R.D. Parikh, ;J.D. Parikh and ;S.R. Pasbola, Advs.

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. The four appellants/original accused Nos. 2 to 5 in three connected Appeals and Suo Motu Application No. 1 of 1998, viz. (1) Rajesh Namdeo Mhatre, (2) Dilip Mahadeo Surve, (3) Ashok Prafulla...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1948

imam DIn Vs. Mt. Said Bibi (Since Deceased) and Others

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Oct-13-1948

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1949PC87

Advocate for Appellant : R.A. Parikh, for Appellant; J. M. Pringle and Dr. C.J. Colombos, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, T.L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Stanley Johnson and Allen.

Sir John Beaumont: This is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature, Lahore, dated 30th January 1936; which reversed a judgment and decree of the Court of the District Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1941

Merla Ramanna Vs. Chelikani Jagannadha Rao and Others

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Mar-18-1941

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Parikh and R.A. Parikh, for Appellant ; Sir H. Cunliffe and P.V. Subba Row, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellant, Lambert and White ; Solicitors for Respondents, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.

Sir George Rankin: Dharma Rao and Kasibabu were brothers, the former being older than the latter by about 19 years. The appellant Merla Ramanna was a creditor of Dharma Rao in respect of a promissory note...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 1947

Adusumilli Gopalakrishnayya Garu Vs. Province of Madras

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Apr-23-1947

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sir Herbert Cunliffe, P.V. Subba Row and R.A. Parikh, for Appellant; J. Millard Tucker and S.P. Khambatta, for Respondent. Solicitors for Appellant, Chapman Walkers; Solicitors for Respondent, Solicitor, India Office.

Appeal [No.35 of 1945], by special leave, from a judgment and decree of the High Court [Kunhi Raman J.] [November 19, 1942], which reversed a judgment and decree of the Court of the District Judge of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial