Advanced Search Results

Manjit Singh Sethi S/o Moolsingh Sethi Vs. Maharashtra Assembly, Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136 and 226

Reported in : 2007(1)CTC42; 2006(6)MhLj849

Advocate for Appellant : R.A. Dada, Sr. Adv. as Amicus Curiae ;Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Adv. and ;S.N. Raj, Adv.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The present petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus, challenging the detention arising out of an order dated 11th /12th April 2006, passed by the State Legislative Assembly, Maharashtra State,...

Godrej Industries Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14

Reported in : 2005(98)ECC25; 2004(171)ELT5(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.A. Dada, Sr. Adv. and ;Milind Vasudeo, Adv. i/b., R. Ravindran, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. Validity of the public notices dated 30th March, 1992 and 17th September, 1997 issued by the Collector of Customs, Mumbai as well as the validity of the Circular dated 27th December, 2002 issued...

Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Cabot International Capital ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board in India Act, 1992 - Sections 15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F, 15G, 15H, 15HA, 15HB, 15I and 15J; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulation 3, 3(1) and 3(4)

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR700; [2005]123CompCas841(Bom); (2004)2CompLJ363(Bom); [2004]51SCL307(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.A. Dada and ;Kumar Desai, Advs.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. Enlarged and projected issue is, whether mens rea is sine qua non, for imposing penalty for breach of the provisions of the SEBI Act and the Regulations framed thereunder, apart from the...

The Thane Janta Sahakari Bank Vs. Election Commission of India and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation Act; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; Representation of Peoples of India Act, 1951 - Sections 26, 26(2), 26(3), 159, 159(1) and 159(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Banking Regulations Act, 1949; Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 - Sections 13AA, 13AA(1), 13AA(4); Representation of Peoples (Amendment) Act, 1998; Constitution of India - Article 74(1), 163(1), 226, 310, 324, 324(6), 326(4) and 327

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR13; 2009(111)BomLR4401; 2010(1)MhLj152

Advocate for Appellant : S. M. Oak, ;Sagar Joshi, Advs. in WP No. 8039 of 2009, ;R.A. Dada, Sr. Adv., ;Purnima Advani, ;Omprakash Jha, Advs., i/b, The law Point in WP No. 8052 of 2009 and ;Y. R. Naik, Adv. in WP. No. 8089 of

S.B. Mhase, J.1. Rule, made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties and heard.2. These petitioners have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed by the District Collectors...

Mansinh L. Bhakta Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(17) and 214A; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 100

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR1; [1991(63)FLR740]; (1995)IIILLJ867Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.A. Dada and Milind Sathe, Advs., i/b., Kanga & Co.

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. The petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 19 of 1985, 20 of 1985, 21 of 1985,22 of 1985 and 228 of 1985 have filed these writ petitions against the impugned notices dated 28th November,...

Bombay Tyres International Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4 and 4(1); Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : 1990LC298(Bombay); 1980CENCUS37D; 1979(4)ELT625(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Setalvad, ;F.H.J. Talyarkhan, ;R.A. Dada and ;S.F. Pochkhanwalla, Advs.;K.C. Cooper, ;R.L. Dalal and ;R.L. Mukherjee, Advs.

B. Lentin, J.1. The petitioner-Company manufactures tyres and other rubber products in Bombay. Since the past several years, the petitioner submitted its price list in the prescribed preformed to the Assistant Collector of Central Excise under...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)163CTR(Bom)440; [2001]112TAXMAN523(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : B.M. Chatterjee and R.N. Bandopadbyay, for the Assessee R.A. Dada, Murlidharan, P.K. Shroff and Subodh Joshi, for the Revenue

Daga, J.This petition is preferred by the revenue against the order of the Settlement Commissioner in the case of Ajmera Housing Corporation, Bombay, relating to the assessment years 1989-90 to 1993-94.In order to appreciate the grievance...

Swati R. Khinvasara Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Acts : Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Section 53(1), 7(2), 5(15), 85(5)

JUDGMENT (Per A.M. Khanwilkar, J.):- 1) By this common judgment, we propose to dispose of the above mentioned matters together as the same involve common issues. 2) The first Writ Petition (Writ Petition No.1430 of 2011)...

international Airports Authority Employees Union Vs. International Air ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : International Airports Authority of India Act, 1971; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 3; Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulations of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981 - Sections 22; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(5)BomCR43; (2002)IIILLJ277Bom

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Singhvi, ;S.K. Singhvi, ;Ramesh Dubey and ;Susheel Mahadeshar, Advs.

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the above petitions agreed that the decision in Writ Petition No. 1623 of 1991 will decide the fate of all the above petitions. We...

Nandlal Vs. Principal Secretary, Maharashtra Legislative Assembly and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Evidence Act; Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 273; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 208; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 2009(2)BomCR254

Advocate for Appellant : Sarvasri Shrihari Aney, Sr. Cou. and; Sachindra B. Shetye, Adv.

Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard. By the present petition the petitioner is seeking to challenge the special report of the Legislative Privilege Committee dated 26-3-2008 and further to quash and set aside the sentence of simple imprisonment...