Advanced Search Results
Auro Food Ltd. Vs. Cit and anr.
Chennai
Nov-18-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)197CTR(Mad)658
P.P.S. Janarthana Raja for M/s. Subbaraya Aiyar, for the Revenue Ms. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Assessee.
P. Sathasivam, J.The writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned single judge dated 9-9-1997, made in W.P. No. 15177 of 1988 (see : [1999]239ITR548(Mad) ), in and by which the learned judge confirmed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Chennai
Sep-15-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN812(Mad)
Ramachandran for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue.
P.D. Dinakaran J.Both these appeals are preferred by the assessee. T.C. (A) No. 300 of 2001 is with reference to the assessment year 1991-92 and T.C. (A) No. 41 of 2002 is with reference to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.
Chennai
Jan-28-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]261ITR63(Mad)
V. Ramachandran for Anita Sumanth, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue
P.K. Misra J.Heard Mr. V. Ramachandran, learned senior counsel, for the petitioner, and Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman for the respondents.2. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the order bearing G. I. No. 4-S of 1995-96 and 1996-97,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dxn Herbal Manufacturing India (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito and ors.
Chennai
Apr-05-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(Mad)378
V. Ramachandran, for the Assessee Mrs. Pushya Sitaraman, for the Revenue
ORDERK. Mohan Ram, J. When WP Nos. 9539 and 9540 of 2006 came up for admission today, Mrs. P.S. Pushya Sitaraman, learned senior counsel standing counsel for the Income Tax Department took notice for the respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Superstar Music and Superstar Exports
Chennai
Feb-26-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 80HHC, 80HHF and 80HHF(5); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 50, 50(1) and 288(2); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973
(2007)210CTR(Mad)128; [2007]291ITR8(Mad)
Pushya Sitaraman, Senior Standing Counsel
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. These appeals are directed against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 25.11.2005 made in ITA.Nos. 126 and 127/Mds/2002 for the assessment year 1999-2000, raising the following common substantial questions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Photo Films Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chenn ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Nov-05-2009
Service Tax
Ms. Pushya Sitaraman, Senior Counsel for the Appellants. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Respondent
Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. Ms. Pushya Sitaraman, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant states that the appellants are a Public Sector Undertaking. Since they have not initially obtained necessary clearance from the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sri M. Kathiresan
Chennai
Feb-08-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)205CTR(Mad)166; [2006]285ITR206(Mad)
Pushya Sitaraman, Sr. Standing Counsel
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law for our consideration:Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax-i Vs. Fal Industries Ltd.
Chennai
Nov-12-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 2(9), 4, 18, 72(3), 33, 80HH, 80HHC, 80J, 80J(2), 145, 145(1) and 147
[2009]314ITR47(Mad)
Pushya Sitaraman, Sr. Standing Counsel
ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J.1. The assessee is a manufacturer of typewriters and vacuum cleaners. It commenced a new industrial undertaking for the manufacture of the above equipments during the previous year ending 31.12.1981 relevant to the assessment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. United India Shoe Corporation Pvt. ...
Chennai
Jun-18-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHC, 143(3) and 147
[2008]302ITR326(Mad)
Pushya Sitaraman, Sr. Standing Counsel
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, 'A' Bench dated 31.7.2003 made in I.T.A. No. 1536/Mds/2002 for the assessment year 1996-97, raising the following substantial question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Parry Confectionary Ltd.
Chennai
Jun-18-2007
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43B
[2008]299ITR321(Mad)
Pushya Sitaraman, Adv.
P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench dated November 7, 2003, made in I.T.A. No. 320/Mds/1997 for the assessment year 1993-94, raising the following substantial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »