Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: priti bhusan burman · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.044 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 20 1951

Ram Chandra Pal Vs. Hiramba Kumar Pal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-20-1951

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Supplies Act, 1946 - Sections 3 and 4; ;Bengal Foodgrains (Disposal and Acquisition,) Order, 1947 - Section 3(1); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1952Cal502,55CWN686

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Barman, Adv.

ORDERBose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for a Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to refrain from acting under the powers purported to have been conferred on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1969

Khan Chand Tarachand Samtani Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-11-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1971CriLJ149

ORDERN.C. Talukdar, J.1. This rule is for setting aside two orders viz., the order dated the 7-12-1968 passed by Shri P.C. Chakraborty, Presidenoy Magistrate, acting on that date as the Chief Presidenoy Magistrate. Calcutta and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 1971

Sunil Kumar Samaddar Vs. the Superintendent, Hooghly Jail and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-23-1971

Subject : Criminal

Acts : West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 - Section 3 and 3(2)

Reported in : AIR1972Cal35,1972CriLJ244,75CWN751

Advocate for Appellant : Naranarayan Gooptu, ;Indrajit Sen and ;B. Malkhandi, Advs.

N.C. Talukdar, J. 1. This Rule was issued on an application under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for a writ and/or order and/or direction in the nature of habeas corpus on behalf...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 24 1979

Euresian Equipments and Chemicals Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Collector of C ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-24-1979

Subject : CustomsFERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1) and 23A; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(19), 11, 51, 113 and 114

Reported in : AIR1980Cal188,1979(2)CHN248,1980(6)ELT38(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman, ;Ranajit Ghosh, ;Roma Bhattacharyya, Advs.

A.N. Sen, J.1. At the hearing of this appeal from the judgment and order passed by P. K. Banerjee, J. on the 23rd of March, 1973, discharging the rule and dismissing the petition filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1965

Purnananda Patra Vs. Collector of Central Excise and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-14-1965

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 309 and 311; ;Civil Services (Temporary Services) Rules, 1949 - Rules 2, 3, 5 and 6

Reported in : AIR1966Cal353,(1967)ILLJ307Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman, Adv.

Sinha, J. 1. This is an appeal against an order of Bose J. (as he then was) dated 13th August, 1959. The facts of this case are shortly as follows: On the 30th July, 1946 the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1959

Purnanando Patra Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-13-1959

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1949 - Rules 2, 3 and 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 310, 311 and 311(2)

Reported in : AIR1960Cal314

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman and ;D.N. Mukherji, Advs.

ORDERH.K. Bose, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution for an appropriate Writ for cancellation of an order dated the 25th February 1958 terminating the employment of the petitioner as an Inspector...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1969

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. Proh ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-20-1969

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5 and 7; ;Iron and Steel (Control) Order, 1956

Reported in : AIR1970Cal167,1970CriLJ571

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman, Adv.

R.N. Dutt, J.1. The respondent was tried by a Magistrate under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, convicted and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 51, In default to rigorous imprisonment for three weeks. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1954

Managing Agents, Ukhra Farming Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Satu Bala Bagdini

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-20-1954

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1) and 30

Reported in : AIR1955Cal105,58CWN751

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman, ;Ranjit Kumar Ghose and ;Manan Kumar Ghosh, Advs.

Chakravartti, C.J. 1. This appeal must be allowed on a point which does not appear to have been fully appreciated or properly canvassed before the learned Commissioner.2. The appeal arises out of an application by one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1969

State Vs. D. Rudra, A.D.M. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-01-1969

Subject : Contempt of CourtCriminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1 and 4; ;Calcutta Criminal Rule - Rule 43(5); ;Calcutta Criminal Order

Reported in : AIR1969Cal602,1969CriLJ1487

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman, Adv.

Das, J. 1. This contempt Rule is against Mr. D. Rudra, Mr. B. K. Sarkar and Mr. A. K. Dasgupta, Additional District Magistrates Alipore and the Officer-in-Charge, Beliaghata Police Station in circumstances stated below:Criminal Appeal No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 1965

The State Vs. Sukumar Chakraborty

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-04-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 404, 413, 414, 480, 485, 485A, 486 and 486(1)

Reported in : AIR1965Cal622,1965CriLJ735

Advocate for Appellant : Priti Bhusan Burman, Adv.

Mitter, J.1. This case has been referred to a full bench for disposal after decision of the following questions:(1) Does an appeal lie to the Sessions Judge when in a proceeding under Section 480 or 485A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial