Advanced Search Results
Cit Vs. R.S. Sibal
Delhi
Nov-12-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]135TAXMAN492(Delhi)
Ms. Prem Lata Bansal for the assessed;S.K. Khurana for the Revenue
D.K. Jain, J.This appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') is directed against order dated 30-1-2003, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Aimil Limited
Delhi
Dec-23-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 28, 36(1), 43B and 139(1); Finance Act, 2003; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 141
(2010)229CTR(Del)418
Prem Lata Bansal and; Paras Chaudhry, Advs. in ITA No. 1063/2008,;
A.K. Sikri, J.1. Though the assessees are different in these appeals, the aforesaid question is common in all these cases, which falls for consideration in almost identical factual backdrop. In fact, it is a matter of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dass Jewellers
Delhi
Aug-16-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 69A, 143, 144, 147, 256(2) and 271(1); Finance Act, 1964; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975
100(2002)DLT318
Prem Lata Bansal and; Ajay Jha, Advs
S.B. Sinha, C.J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C', New Delhi (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as, 'the Tribunal') has sent the statement of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Cit Vs. Dass Jewellers
Delhi
Aug-16-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN702(Delhi)
Ms. Prem Lata Bansal and; Ajay Jha, for the Revenu
S.B. Sinha, C.J. At the instance of the revenue, the Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'C', has sent the statement of the case to this court for its opinion in terms of section 256(2) of the Income Tax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Iffco Ltd.
Delhi
Nov-27-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)192CTR(Del)547
Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Revenue None, for the assessed
D.K. Jain, JThis appeal by the revenue, under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 7,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Gangour Investment Ltd.
Delhi
Jan-30-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 68, 142(1), 143(3) and 260A
[2009]179TAXMAN1(Delhi)
Prem Lata Bansal, Adv
Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. The Revenue has preferred the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeo Enpro Petroleum Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
Delhi
May-04-2009
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 42, 80IB, 80IB(9), 80IB(14), 801A, 115JA(1), 115JAA and 260A
(2009)224CTR(Del)244; [2009]315ITR153(Delhi); [2009]183TAXMAN374(Delhi)
S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. and; H. Raghavendra Rao, Adv
Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. The above captioned appeals have been preferred by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') against a common judgment dated 04.05.2007 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubodh Kumar Bhargava Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Delhi
Nov-26-2008
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 44AB, 143(1), 143(3), 260A, 263, 271B, 271D, 271E, 274, 275 and 275(1)
(2009)221CTR(Del)534; [2009]309ITR31(Delhi)
Rakesh Gupta,; Poonam Ahuja and; Aarti Saini, Advs
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. In this appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), the following substantial question of law had been framed for our consideration:That having regard...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax. Vs Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi
Sep-10-2010
Land Acquisition
Mrs. Prem Lata Bansal, Adv.
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?No.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No.ORDER.1. The present appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. R.V. Gupta
Delhi
Jul-22-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]123TAXMAN191(Delhi)
Prem Lata Bansal, for the Revenu
D.K. Jain, J. This is an appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order of the Tribunal, Delhi Bench-A, dated 21-11-2001, passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »