Advanced Search Results
Chitru Devi Vs. Smt. Ram Dei and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-29-2001
FamilyProperty
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 90; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 100
AIR2002HP59
Prem Goel, Adv.
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This is plaintiffs second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 29-9-1997 of Disrict Judge, Kullu in Civil Appeal No. 33/1996 whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThoilu Vs. Krishan Gopal and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-11-1983
FamilyProperty
Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Section 15(1) and 15(2)
AIR1984HP58
Prem Goel, Adv.
T.R. Handa, J.1. 'Whether a stepson can claim a right of pre-emption under Section 15(1)(a), Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 (as amended up to date), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' in respect of sale of self-acquired...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.B. Mathur Vs. Sheel Kumar Saxena
Delhi
Apr-21-1989
Tenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 49; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)
39(1989)DLT179
S.K. Poonam,; L.M. Sanghvi,; S.N. Kumar and;
M.K. Chawla, J.(1) Shri Sheel Kumar Saxena (hereinafter referred to as the respondent), is the owner of the premise bearing no.. C-16, Paschimi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi. He filed a petition for eviction on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
H.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. Vs. Charan Singh and Company
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-08-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 30 and 33
2003(3)ARBLR659(HP)
Sandeep Kaushik, Adv.
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. 1. This appeal under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter for short 'the Act') has been preferred by the Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation Ltd.--defendant herein against the judgment dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.P.S.i.D.C. Vs. Manson India Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Sep-15-2008
Civil
2008(3)ShimLC300
Deepak Gupta, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19.4.2000 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court whereby he dismissed the suit filed by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Saran Singh Thakur Vs. Shri Ram Sarup Thakur and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Oct-06-1988
FamilyProperty
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 64 and 65; ;Hindu Law
AIR1990HP1
K.D. Sood and; Prem Goel, Advs.
V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court by which he decided Civil Suit No. 37 of 1976. The plaintiff isThakur Ram Singh. The two...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHypine Carbons Limited Vs. J.C. Bhatia and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-13-1998
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 541, 541(1), 542 and 543
[2001]103CompCas422(HP)
Prem Goel, Adv.
R.L. Khurana, J.1. This order will dispose of the petition preferred under Sections 542 and 543 read with Section 541 of the Companies Act, 1956, by the official liquidator of the petitioner-company, Hypine Carbons Limited, claiming...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPritam Singh and ors. Vs. Charan Dass Dogra and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Feb-09-1973
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2
AIR1973HP90
H.S. Thakur and; Prem Goel, Advs.
ORDERD.B. Lal, J.1. The petitioners are defendants in a suit filed by Shri Charan Dass Dogra, Advocate, Kulu (respondent No. 1) for the reliefs of declaration that the plaintiff be declared primary and active member of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSai Electricals Vs. Income-tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Jul-19-1989
Direct Taxation
(1990)32ITD186(Delhi)
1. This is an assessee's appeal directed against the order dated 6-3-1986, passed by the CIT, Meerut, under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act.2. The facts of the case are these. For the assessment year 1981-82,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmitabh Bachchan Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
May-18-2005
MRTP
(2005)97TTJ(Mum.)516
1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Central-VII, Mumbai, dt. 30th July, 2004 for the asst. yr.2001-02. "(I) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »