Advanced Search Results

Universal Petrochemicals Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Electricity Board Overruled

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 2E, 5, 11, 20, 31, 31(4), 34, 39 and 41;;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 23;

Reported in : AIR2001Cal102,(2001)2CALLT417(HC),2001(2)CHN300

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pratap Chatterjee and ;Mr. Amitesh Banerjee, Advs.

P.K. Chattopadhyay, J.1. These two appeals arise out of two separate judgments and orders passed by the learned trial Judge while dealing with one proceeding. Both the appeals were heard analogously as the facts are same,...

Harsh Vardhan Lodha Vs. the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Indi ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 - Section 21; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 10, 11 and 141 - Order 2 Rule 2 - Order 23, Rules 1 and 3; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; ;Writ Rules - Rule 53; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988 - Regulations 2(11) and 12(4)

Advocate for Appellant : Anindya Mitra, ; Pratap Chatterjee, ;Arunava Ghosh, ;Soumen Sen, ;Abhrajit Mitra and ;S.K. Trivedi, Advs. in W.P.No. 7034 (W) of 2009, ;Sakti Nath Mukherjee, ;Saptangsu Basu, ;Soumya Majumder and ;S.K

Dipankar Datta, J.1. The petitioners in W.P. No. 7034 (W) of 2009 and W.P. No. 7038 (W) of 2009, Harsh Vardhan Lodha and Aditya Vikram Lodha respectively, are chartered accountants. They are enrolled members of the...

Ambica Charan Sinha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)CHN468

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Chatterjee, ;S. Sarkar, ;P. Sinha, ;S. Majumder and ;A. Mitra, Advs.; S.N. Hossain; R. Bachawat, ;V. Meharia, ;A. Guha and ;S. Dasgupta, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. The petitioner herein has challenged the decisions taken in the meeting held on 25th August, 2004 in presence of the superior officers of the Oil companies in order to resolve the disputes...

Ajoy Kumar Rathod and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226, 367 and 372;; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956;; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 2(42)

Reported in : (1999)3CALLT423(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pratap Chatterjee, Adv.

M. H. S. Ansari, J. 1. Brief facts leading to the filing of the Instantwrit application are that: the petitioners are the landlords of the premises being third and fourth floors and two servants quarters at...

National Highways Authority of India Vs. Additional District Magistrat ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : National Highways Authority of India Act, 1956 - Section 3, 3A to 3F, 3G and 3G(7); ;National Highways Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 1997; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14 and 300A; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Chatterjee, ;D. Basak, ;Aniruddha Roy, ;D.N. Sharma and ;R.K. Rai, Advs.

Tapan Mukherjee, J.1. This appeal at the instance of the writ petitioner is directed against the judgment and order of dismissal passed by the Learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 15635 (W) of 2004.2. The writ...

Dhiren Krishna Paul Trading Vs. Health and Glow Retailing Private Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7 Rule 11; Trade Marks Act - Sections 35, 29(5), 29(4), 134; Copyrights Act - Section 62(2), 62; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 20, 22

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Pratap Chatterjee, Adv.

1.This appeal has been filed against the order dated 13.06.2007 made in O.A.No.310 of 2007 for granting an interim injunction restraining the defendants, their servants and agents and others from using the words HEALTH & GLOW...

Arbind Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Warner A. Bock K.G.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 33

Reported in : AIR1981Cal18

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Chatterjee, Adv.

ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, inter alia for determination of the existence, validity and scope of the arbitration agreement and a declaration that noarbitration...

Mehta Suraya and I.P.M. Industries Limited and ors. Vs. United Investm ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 122, 129, 151, 152, 153 and 153A - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 20, Rule 3 - Order 41, Rules 10 and 11; ;Transfer of Property Act - Sections 108, 111 and 115; ;West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act - Sections 13(2), 13(5) and 16; ;Original Side Rule - Rule 7

Reported in : AIR2002Cal108,(2002)2CALLT272(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Anindya Mitra, ;P.K. Roy and ;S.K. Kapoor, Advs.;B.K. Bachawat and ;Pratap Chatterjee, Advs.;Bhaskar Sen, Adv.

1. The decree in C.S. No. 183 of 1999 was put to execution In G.A. No, 3750 of 2000 by the decree holder Mehta Suraya. The applicant in G.A. No. 3 of 2001, has prayed for...

Sri Achintya Kumar Chattopadhyay and ors. Vs. the Steel Authority of I ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5(3) and 16

Reported in : AIR2008Cal184,(2008)3CALLT159(HC),2008(3)CHN1067

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Chatterjee, ;Debjani Sengupta and ;Prosenjit Saha, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. This appeal has been preferred at the instance of the writ petitioners from the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge whereby and whereunder the said learned Single Judge dismissed...

Sibaji Mitra Vs. Smt. Prakashwati Chopra and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules, 1865; ; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 - Section 44; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 9; ; Indian Succession Act, 1925

Reported in : (2004)2CALLT555(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Chatterjee, Senior Adv. and ; Ajoy Chandra, Adv.

1. The Court: This is an application under Chapter 13A of the Original Side Rules. The plaintiff is the executor, heir, legal representative and a legatee of the last Will and testament of his father, late...