Advanced Search Results
Ram Murti Devi Vs. Pushpa Devi
Supreme Court of India
Jul-11-2017
Tenancy
Prashant Chaudhary
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8954/2017 ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO. 26342 OF 2013 RAM MURTI DEVI … APPELLANT VERSUS PUSHPA DEVI AND OTHERS … RESPONDENTS J...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnukriti Dubey Vs. Partha Kansabanik and Another
Delhi
Mar-23-2016
MRTP
1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The present second appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 30.01.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge-2, South West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in RCA No.34/2015 whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManjeet Singh Vs. State of H.P.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-25-2014
Criminal
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1695 OF2005MANJEET SINGH … APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH … RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 18th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mr. Prashant Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Delhi
Aug-09-2018
Land Acquisition
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3803/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 MR. PRASHANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJudges Colony Welfare Assn. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-13-2009
Civil
ORDER1. Application for impleadment is allowed.2. Leave granted.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.4. By the impugned order, the High Court recalled earlier order dated 20.2.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 3638 of 2006, and restored...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBharat Chaudhary and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-08-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 498A and 504; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 439
AIR2003SC4662; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)976; 2004(1)ALT4(SC); 2003(3)BLJR2202; 2003CriLJ5038; II(2003)DMC715SC; [2003(4)JCR237(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl2)SC542; 2003(3)KLT956(SC); 2004(1)Mh
Vikash Singh,; Yunus Malik and; Prashant Chaudhary, Advs
Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. Appellants in this case are husband and wife and were accused by their daughter-in-law of offences punishable under Sections 504, 498A and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh . Vs. Board of Revenue u.p. .
Supreme Court of India
Mar-08-2019
Land Acquisition
Prashant Chaudhary
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5040 OF2008Vs. JUDGMENT RAKESH & ORS. ...APPELLANTS BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. & ORS. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.This appeal has been filed against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Satish
Supreme Court of India
Feb-08-2005
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 363, 366 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366
AIR2005SC1000; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)614; 2005CriLJ1428; 2005(2)CTC71; JT2005(2)SC153; (2005)3SCC114; 2005(1)LC367(SC); [2005] 1 SCR 1132
Pramod Swarup,; Prashant Chaudhary and; Praveen Swarup, Ad
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. One Vishakha @ Akansha (hereinafter referred to as the 'victim') who had not even seen six summers in her life lost her life on account of bestial acts of the respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Gambhir Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-20-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302
AIR2005SC2439; 2005CriLJ2579; JT2005(5)SC553; (2005)11SCC271
Prashant Chaudhary and; Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Advs
1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 4th April, 1996 in Criminal Appeal No.381 of 1991. The High Court, by its...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sheo Sanehi and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-06-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2004SC4974; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)957; 2004CriLJ4650; JT2004(9)SC196; 2004(8)SCALE520; (2004)12SCC347
Praveen Swarup and; Prashant Chaudhary, Advs
B.N. Agarwal, J.1. All the eight respondents were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302/149 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Ayodhya Prasad (respondent No. 2) was further convicted under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »