Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: prashant chaudhary · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2017

Ram Murti Devi Vs. Pushpa Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-11-2017

Subject : Tenancy

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Chaudhary

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8954/2017 ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO. 26342 OF 2013 RAM MURTI DEVI … APPELLANT VERSUS PUSHPA DEVI AND OTHERS … RESPONDENTS J...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2016

Anukriti Dubey Vs. Partha Kansabanik and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-23-2016

Subject : MRTP

1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The present second appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 30.01.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge-2, South West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in RCA No.34/2015 whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2014

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-25-2014

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1695 OF2005MANJEET SINGH … APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH … RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 18th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 09 2018

Mr. Prashant Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3803/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 MR. PRASHANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2009

Judges Colony Welfare Assn. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2009

Subject : Civil

ORDER1. Application for impleadment is allowed.2. Leave granted.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.4. By the impugned order, the High Court recalled earlier order dated 20.2.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 3638 of 2006, and restored...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2003

Bharat Chaudhary and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 498A and 504; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 439

Reported in : AIR2003SC4662; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)976; 2004(1)ALT4(SC); 2003(3)BLJR2202; 2003CriLJ5038; II(2003)DMC715SC; [2003(4)JCR237(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl2)SC542; 2003(3)KLT956(SC); 2004(1)Mh

Advocate for Appellant : Vikash Singh,; Yunus Malik and; Prashant Chaudhary, Advs

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. Appellants in this case are husband and wife and were accused by their daughter-in-law of offences punishable under Sections 504, 498A and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2019

Rakesh . Vs. Board of Revenue u.p. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-08-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Chaudhary

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5040 OF2008Vs. JUDGMENT RAKESH & ORS. ...APPELLANTS BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. & ORS. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.This appeal has been filed against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2005

State of U.P. Vs. Satish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302, 363, 366 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366

Reported in : AIR2005SC1000; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)614; 2005CriLJ1428; 2005(2)CTC71; JT2005(2)SC153; (2005)3SCC114; 2005(1)LC367(SC); [2005] 1 SCR 1132

Advocate for Appellant : Pramod Swarup,; Prashant Chaudhary and; Praveen Swarup, Ad

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. One Vishakha @ Akansha (hereinafter referred to as the 'victim') who had not even seen six summers in her life lost her life on account of bestial acts of the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2005

State of U.P. Vs. Gambhir Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : AIR2005SC2439; 2005CriLJ2579; JT2005(5)SC553; (2005)11SCC271

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Chaudhary and; Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Advs

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 4th April, 1996 in Criminal Appeal No.381 of 1991. The High Court, by its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2004

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sheo Sanehi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-06-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2004SC4974; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)957; 2004CriLJ4650; JT2004(9)SC196; 2004(8)SCALE520; (2004)12SCC347

Advocate for Appellant : Praveen Swarup and; Prashant Chaudhary, Advs

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. All the eight respondents were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302/149 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Ayodhya Prasad (respondent No. 2) was further convicted under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial