Advanced Search Results

Ram Murti Devi Vs. Pushpa Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Chaudhary

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8954/2017 ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO. 26342 OF 2013 RAM MURTI DEVI … APPELLANT VERSUS PUSHPA DEVI AND OTHERS … RESPONDENTS J...

Anukriti Dubey Vs. Partha Kansabanik and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

1. Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The present second appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 30.01.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge-2, South West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in RCA No.34/2015 whereby...

Manjeet Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1695 OF2005MANJEET SINGH … APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH … RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.The appellant has assailed the judgment dated 18th...

Mr. Prashant Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3803/2018 Judgment delivered on:09. 08.2018 MR. PRASHANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates...

Judges Colony Welfare Assn. and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

ORDER1. Application for impleadment is allowed.2. Leave granted.3. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.4. By the impugned order, the High Court recalled earlier order dated 20.2.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 3638 of 2006, and restored...

Bharat Chaudhary and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406, 498A and 504; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 439

Reported in : AIR2003SC4662; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)976; 2004(1)ALT4(SC); 2003(3)BLJR2202; 2003CriLJ5038; II(2003)DMC715SC; [2003(4)JCR237(SC)]; JT2003(Suppl2)SC542; 2003(3)KLT956(SC); 2004(1)Mh

Advocate for Appellant : Vikash Singh,; Yunus Malik and; Prashant Chaudhary, Advs

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. Appellants in this case are husband and wife and were accused by their daughter-in-law of offences punishable under Sections 504, 498A and...

Rakesh . Vs. Board of Revenue u.p. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Chaudhary

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5040 OF2008Vs. JUDGMENT RAKESH & ORS. ...APPELLANTS BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. & ORS. ETC. ...RESPONDENTS ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.This appeal has been filed against the...

State of U.P. Vs. Gambhir Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : AIR2005SC2439; 2005CriLJ2579; JT2005(5)SC553; (2005)11SCC271

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Chaudhary and; Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, Advs

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 4th April, 1996 in Criminal Appeal No.381 of 1991. The High Court, by its...

State of U.P. Vs. Man Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 201, 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR2003SC62; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)946; 2003CriLJ82; JT2002(8)SC538; (2002)8SCC435

Advocate for Appellant : Praveen Swarup,; Prashant Chaudhary and; Pramod Swarup, Ad

Arun Kumar, J.1. These appeals are directed against a Division Bench judgmentdated 9.1.1992 of the Allahabad High Court allowing the appealsagainst the judgment of conviction passed by the IVth AdditionalSessions judge, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh. The High...

State of U.P. Vs. Sunder Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : JT1999(10)SC507; (2000)2SCC174

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Goel,; Prashant Chaudhary and; A.S. Pundir, Advs

ORDERK.T. Thomas, J.1. Delay is apparently very inordinate. Even so we are disinclined to allow public justice to suffer in the case on account of laches of the officers of the State who are responsible for...