Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: prasanthi prasad · Page 1 of about 10 results (0.073 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 06 2010

Om Prakash Saini Vs. Dcm Ltd. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2010

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21; Constitution of India - Article 22

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Prasanthi Prasad

1. Leave granted.2. In these appeals, prayer has been made for setting aside order dated 22.8.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge of Delhi High Court in R.A. Nos. 329 of 2007, 401 of 2007 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 1999

imonual Poly Bags Inds. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Oct-07-1999

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(114)ELT953TriDel

1. In these appeals filed by M/s. Immuanual Poly Bag and others the matter relates to the classification of high density polyethylene strips. The allegations of suppression of production and clandestine manufacture of the tapes had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2006

Harsh Vardhan Bansal Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-24-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1979 - Regulation 6

Reported in : AIR2006SC2261; 2006(3)AWC3119(SC); (2006)144PLR63; 2006(6)SCALE306; (2006)9SCC708

Advocate for Appellant : Prasanthi Prasad, Adv

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Heard Ms. Prashanthi Prasad, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, learned Counsel for the respondent Board. 2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the High Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2009

Mani @ Udattu Man and ors. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148 and 302

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW2190; 2009CriLJ2268; JT2009(4)SC169; 2009(3)SCALE431; (2009)12SCC288; 2009(4)LHSC2240; 2009(4)KCCRSN184

Advocate for Appellant : Prasanthi Prasad, Adv

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in these appeals is to the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the appeal field by the appellants who were convicted for offences punishable under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 2008

Mani Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : AIR2008SC1021; 2008CriLJ1046; JT2008(1)SC191; (2009)1MLJ824(SC); 2008(1)SCALE126; 2008AIRSCW576; 2008(1)Crimes174

Advocate for Appellant : Prasanthi Prasad, Adv

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This appeal challenges the judgment of the High Court whereby the conviction of the appellant- Mani for an offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 34 as also the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2008

Murugan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-07-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 376(1) and 511

Reported in : AIR2008SC2876; 2008CriLJ3518; JT2008(7)SC281; 2008(9)SCALE627; (2008)11SCC610

Advocate for Appellant : Prasanthi Prasad, Adv. (SCLSC

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Section 376(1) read with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2002

Leather Avenues India Vs. State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-01-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 21; Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 4(1) and 7(2); Delhi Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1997; Delhi Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)20; 2002(62)DRJ329

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Shakdhar and; Prasanthi Prasad, Advs

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. Civil Writ petition Nos. 524 of 2002 and 1450 of 2002 are identical in nature, thereforee, we deem it appropriate to dispose of both these petitions by a common judgment.2. In these petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1995

J.S. Punia Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-15-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 107; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 22; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : ILR1995Delhi768

Advocate for Appellant : Prasanthi Prasad,; A.P. Vinod,; V.K. Shall and;

Mohd. Shamim, J.(1) The petitioner through the present writ petition wants this Court to issue a writ of prohibition restraining ]the respondents from convening the General Court Martial. He further wants direction from this Court for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 2001

Air Com. K.P. Sreekant Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-24-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2002(61)DRJ257

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Shakdhar and; Ms. Prasanthi Prasad, Advs

ORDERDr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for quashing of the annual report generated by respondent No.4 for the period from 1.10.1999 to 31.9.2000 and also for setting aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1994

E. Padmanabhan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-21-1994

Subject : ServiceCriminal

Acts : Army Rules, 1950 - Rule 27; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)797; 53(1994)DLT823; 1994(28)DRJ571

Advocate for Appellant : Prasanthi Prasad and; V.K. Shall, Advs

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.(1) The petitioner, an officer of the Indian Army in the rank of Colonel who was due to retire with effect from 30th September, 1993 on attaining the age of super annuation, was placed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial