Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: pramod kumar jain · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 1993

Shiraj Sunfix Company (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-11-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 127; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1993]201ITR457(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Pramod Kumar Jain, Adv.

1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Shekhar Srivastava, learned counsel representing respondents Nos. 1 and 2.2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the concerned Income-tax Officer who has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1996

Sushil Kumar and Sons Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-11-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40 and 171

Reported in : (1998)145CTR(All)121; [1998]234ITR98(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kumar Agrawal and ;Pramod Kumar Jain, Advs.

M.C. Agarwal, J.1. These three references under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), pertain to the assessment year 1975-76 and have been made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2004

Ashwani Kumar JaIn Vs. Cegat

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 129E; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(180)ELT155(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Pramod Kumar Jain, Adv.

Prakash Krishna, J.1. These three writ petitions arise of a common order dated 25-6-2001 passed by Respondent No. 1 on three applications, each filed by each of the petitioners in respect of three appeals pending before...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 07 2004

Kanpur Agra Transport Company and ors. Vs. Amar Jeet Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16(1)

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2127

Advocate for Appellant : Pramod Kumar Jain, ;Gaurav Jain, ;K.N. Dayal, ;Rama Goel and ;Saurabh Jain, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the tenant for the quashing of the judgment dated 1.9.1986 passed by the prescribed authority under U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 and the Appellate order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2004

Surendra Kumar Vs. Amarjeet Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17, 17(2) and 49; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4 and 54; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR2004All335; 2004(4)AWC3134

Advocate for Appellant : Km. Rama Goel, ;Arun Kumar, ;Pramod Kumar Jain, ;Saurabh Jain and ;Gaurav Jain, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance alleging that the defendant Nos. 2 to 12 were the owners of the premises No. 79/7 Lathouche Road, Kanpur Nagar. They had appointed the defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1998

Smt. Mehar Jahan Vs. J.S.C.C./Prescribed Authority, Meerut and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-22-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21, 21(1), 23 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 23, Rules 3 and 22

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC200

Advocate for Appellant : Pramod Kumar Jain, Adv.

J. C. Gupta, J.1. Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Jain counsel appearing for the petitioner. Sri Pankaj Mittal appears for the respondent No. 2 and he has also been heard.2. By Means of this writpetition, the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1997

Pramod Kumar JaIn Vs. Girdhari Lal Batra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-31-1997

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14

Reported in : 70(1997)DLT28

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Agarwal,; Ashwini Bhardwaj and; Inderjit Siddhu, A

Vijender Jain, J.(1) This is a petition by Pramod Kumar Jain under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act for making the award dated 5.10.1989 as a Rule of the Court. Against this award objection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1997

Pawan Kumar JaIn Vs. Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-01-1997

Subject : Contract

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Sections 3; State Financial Corporations Act, 1957 - Sections 29; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 128

Reported in : AIR1998All57

Advocate for Appellant : Pramod Kumar Jain, Adv.

Palok Basu, J.1. The petitioner Pawan Kumar Jain admittedly a guarantor on behalf of respondent No. 4 M/s. Shri Gayatri Alloy Steels Pvt. Ltd. has challenged the citation dated 7-8-1997 for the sum of Rs. 2,02,22,741.99...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2016

Vikas Verma Vs. The Director (Mrts-I) and CPIO, Ministry of Urban Deve ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-02-2016

Subject : Right to Information

1. The petition impugns the decision dated 4th February, 2015 of the Central Information Commission (CIC) constituted under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) of dismissal of second appeal (File No.CIC/KY/A/2014/000883) preferred by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2007

Kanpur Development Authority Vs. Arjun Dev Kehar

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-20-2007

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC571

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Tripathi

Dilip Gupta, J.1. The Kanpur Development Authority, Kanpur (hereinafter referred to as the 'Development Authority') has filed this application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for condoning the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial