Advanced Search Results
Employers in Relation to the Management of N.E. Railway Vs. Presiding ...
Jharkhand
Sep-25-2003
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10 and 25B(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Administrative Tribunal Act
[2004(102)FLR361]; [2004(2)JCR262(Jhr)]
Pradip Modi, Adv.
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. The petitioner (Management of North Eastern Railways) have filed the instant writ application challenging the award passed on 29.03.2001 by the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad in reference Case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmployers in Relation to the Management of North Eastern Railway, Now ...
Jharkhand
May-18-2005
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F
[2005(3)JCR443(Jhr)]
Pradip Modi, Adv.
ORDER1. In keeping with the direction given on the last occasion, the records of Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad in Reference No. 91 of 1993 have been made available. From the said records...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshmi Narayan Kasera Vs. Dhirendra Kumar JaIn and ors.
Jharkhand
May-13-2005
Civil
Limitation Act - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Order 41, Rules 3A, 3A(3), 11, 11(1) and 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rules 1(1) and (3)
[2005(4)JCR46(Jhr)]
Pradip Modi, Adv.
ORDERN.N. Tiwari, J.1. In this application, the appellant has prayed for an order of stay of the proceeding of Execution Case No. 5 of 2004 pending in the Court of Munsif at Hazaribagh. It has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mahesh Thakur Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Jharkhand
Jan-12-2004
Service
Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2004(1)JCR502(Jhr)]
A. Allam,; R. Vardhan and; Nehala Sharmin, Advs.
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard Mr. A. Allam, learned counsel for the petitions and Mr. Pradip Modi, GP I.2. The petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the order of his transfer as contained in letter No. 1750,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMumtaz Ahmed Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Patna
Aug-02-2004
Service
Service Law
M.S. Anwar, Sr. Adv.
Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. M.S. Anwar, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradip Modi, learned GP-I for the State-respondents.2. The Petitioner in this case has challenged the order of dismissal from service passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Kumar Agarwal and anr. Vs. State of Bihar Through Secretary, Fo ...
Jharkhand
Apr-23-2003
Commercial
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 6A; Bihar Finance Act, 1931 - Sections 31; Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order, 1984 - Sections 2(L)
[2003(3)JCR827(Jhr)]
Shankar Lal Agrawal, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr Shankar Lal Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr Pradip Modi, learned GP I for the State-Respondents.2. The Petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 29.12.1998 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Jagdamba Coke Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ...
Jharkhand
Dec-20-2007
Sales Tax/VAT
[2008(1)JCR572(Jhr)]
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Petitioner filed this writ petition for quashing the order dated 17.8.2006 passed by respondent No. 4 - Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Administration), Dhanbad Division, Dhanbad initiating a suo motu revision proceeding under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNemi Chand Vijay Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Jharkhand
Sep-10-2003
Service
Service Law
[2004(2)JCR270(Jhr)]
Ram Kishore Prasad, Adv.
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. At the outset, Mr. Ram Kishore Prasad prays that he may be allowed to implead Slate of Jharkhand as respondent No. 7.Let him do so.2. Heard Mr. Ram Kishore Prasad, learned counsel for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Sagar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Jharkhand
Feb-26-2003
Tenancy
Bihar Privileged Persons Homestead Tenancy Act, 1947 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
[2003(2)JCR156(Jhr)]
A.N. Deo, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J. 1. Heard Mr. A.N. Deo, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Manjul Prasad, who states that he is appearing in this case for the State-respondents after having obtained consent of Mr. Pradip Modi,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsiya Shah Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Jharkhand
Feb-13-2002
Constitution
Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 70; Constitution of India - Article 14
2002(50)BLJR1037
A.K. Sinha, Sr. Adv.
ORDERTapen Sen, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner Asiya Shah, has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to accept her admission in the M.B.B.S. course at the Rajendra Medical College. Ranchi for the Session...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »