Advanced Search Results

Mohd. YamIn and Others Vs. Mulla Abdul Sattar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilFamily

Acts : Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2219

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Saxena, Adv.

P.K. Jain, J. 1. The short question that has been raised in this revision is whether in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the court fee payable by the plaintiffs-revisionists shall be in accordance...

Harpreet Singh and Others Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

SANJIV KHANNA, J: 1. These four appeals by Harpreet Singh, Satyender Singh, Kuldeep Singh and Munish Kumar impugn the judgment dated 17th August, 2009 in Case No. 10/2004 arising out of FIR No. 247/2003 and the...

Narendra Tandon Vs. U.P State Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : III(2002)ACC60

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Saxena

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the award dated 16.1.1996 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aligarh for enhancing the amount of compensation.2. The claim petition was filed by the appellants with the...

Narendra Tandon Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(2002)ACC515

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Saxena

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the award dated 16.1.1996 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Aligarh for enhancing the amount of compensation.2. The claim petition was filed by the appellants with the...

M/s. Panch Raghou Taank Ramnivas Sarda and Co. Vs. Hindustan Petroleum ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The substantial question of law formulated and to be answered by this Court in this plaintiffs second appeal is as under: “Whether both the Courts below are justified in dismissing the plaintiffs suit holding that...

Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation Vs. M/s. Raipur Developmen ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Education

(1) The climactic issue that falls for consideration in this writ petition is whether Raipur Development Authority-Respondent herein is exempted from the provisions contained in Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 by virtue of...

Balraj Sakhuja vs.pradeep Saxena & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Atul Aggarwal

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 05, 2019 TR.P.(CRL.) 58/2019 BALRAJ SAKHUJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Aggarwal, Advocate Versus PRADEEP SAXENA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through:...

Sanjai Kumar and anr. Vs. Vith Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 107, 116 and 145

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2413

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Saxena, Adv.

ORDERN. Saxena, J.1. The dispute relates to a house and shop situated in Mohalla Gandhi Tola, Tehsil, Nawabganj, District Bareilly. Sanjai Kumar and Anjai Kumar, who were real brothers, claimed to have purchased the same from...

Smt. Shamim Begum and ors. Vs. Judge, Small Causes Court/Prescribed Au ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 23; Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7 and 7A

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC775

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Saxena, ;W.H. Khan and ;Jawed Hussain Khan, Advs.

A.K. Yog, J. 1. Present petition arises out of the impugned Judgment and order dated 11.1.2002, Annexure-1 to the petition, whereby the prescribed authority, rejected objections filed by the tenant-petitioners (paper No. 28 and 9C) primarily...

Baboo Lal Dubey Vs. Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2453

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Saxena, Adv.

S.K. Singh, J. 1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 19.4.2001 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) as has been passed by respondent No. 2 by...