Advanced Search Results

Rajpal Singh Alias Rajveer Singh Vs. Abdul Haq Khan and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 22

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1150

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Kumar, Adv.

A.K. Yog, J. 1. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Atiq Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the contesting respondent No. 1.2. The petitioner who happened to be the tenant...

Parbhash Chandra JaIn (D) Through L.Rs. Vs. A.D.J. (Special Judge, Ess ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 and 152; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1980 - Sections 34(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 22; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC781

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kiran Jain, ;R.B.D. Mishra and ;Ashish Kumar Singh, Advs.

ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the State as well as Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the contesting respondent.2....

State of Haryana Vs. Pradeep Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 148, 149, 302, 323, 392 & 452; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD(Cri)75; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)96; (1999)1CALLT56(SC); JT1998(8)SC510; 1998(6)SCALE498; (1999)9SCC72; 1999(1)LC209(SC)

ORDERNanavati, J. 1. These two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal Nos. 73 DB, 91-DB and 104-DB of 1990. The State...

Praveen Kumar and anr. Vs. JaIn Vishva Bharati Institute and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2528; 2004(4)WLC219

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Lohra, Adv.

N.P. Gupta, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing of the charge-sheet Annexure-8 dt. 24.3.2004, so also order of expulsion, passed against the two petitioners on 31.3.2004 being Annexure-9 & 10, and also seek...

Krishna Bhagwan Agarwal and Another Vs. Ist Additional District Judge, ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Uttar Pradesh High Speed Diesel Oil and Light Diesel Oil (Maitenance Order), 1981

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC1986

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Goyal,;Y.S. Saxena and;R.P. Goyal, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J.1. By means of Civil Misc. Writ No. 6404 of 1999 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the order dated 9.2.1999 passed by respondent No. 1, 1st Additional District Judge, Badaun appointing...

Kshama Sahakari Avas Samiti Ltd. Through Its Secretary Amit JaIn Son o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(2), 9, 17, 17(1) and 17(4); Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 226 and 300A

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC327

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Goyal and ;P.C. Jain, Advs.

Pankaj Mithal, J.1. The petitioner has assailed the notification dated 03.10.2005 (annexure-1 to the writ petition) issued under Section 4(1) read with Section 17(1) and Section 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as...

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Sandeep Choudhary

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : PRADEEP KUMAR MATHUR __ PRATIBHA JAIN

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8717 OF2015Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & Anr. …Appellants Versus Sandeep Choudhary & Ors. …Respondents J UD G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J.1....

Zee Telefilms Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 7, 12, 13(1), 13(2), 14, 17, 19, 19(1), 19(6), 21, 21A, 26, 32, 73, 77, 145(3), 226 and 298; Human Rights Act, 1998 - Sections 8; Companies Act; Succession Act 1925 - Sections 118; International Airport Authority Act, 1971; International Cricket Council Rules - Rules 8, 9, 10, 12, 32, 32A, 33, 34, 35 and 38; Societies Registration Act 1860; Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Trade Practices Act, 1974; Wheat Marketing Act, 1989

Reported in : AIR2005SC2677; (2005)4CompLJ283(SC); JT2005(2)SC8; (2005)4SCC649; [2005] 1 SCR 913; MANU/SC/0074/2005

N. Santosh Hegde, J. 1. I have had the benefit of reading the judgment of Sinha, J. I regret I cannot persuade myself to agree with the conclusions recorded in the said judgment hence this separate...

Ved Prakash Sharma Vs. the Union of India Through the Secretary, M.O.C ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Pradeep Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: K.R. Sachdeva, R.C. Gautam, Advocates.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda Member (A) 1. By this OA, Shri Ved Prakash Sharma, the applicant herein, prays for the following relief(s):- “1. To quash and set-aside the impugned orders to the extent the applicant has...

Bal Kishan Bansal Son of Purushottam Das Bansal Vs. Pramit Bansal Son ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2) and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2006All305; 2007(1)ARBLR47(All); 2006(4)AWC3509

Advocate for Appellant : M.M.D. Agrawal and ;Pradeep Kumar, Advs.

P. Krishna, J.1. Three persons namely Bal Kishan Bansal, Devki Nandan Bansal and Pramit Bansal formed a partnership under the name and style of M/s Bhagwati Glass Enterprises with the object of carrying on the business...