Advanced Search Results
Narayan International Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Oct-01-2007
Customs
Customs Act - Sections 14(1), 45 155; Contract Act - Sections 161, 162 and 171; Bombay Port Trust Act - Sections 3(5); Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 111; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 35; Bankruptcy Act, 1883; Sale of Goods Act, 1983; Limitation Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(20); Constitution of India - Article 226
2007(122)ECC235; 2007(148)LC235(Delhi); 2008(221)ELT183(Del)
Pradeep Jain, Adv
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The Petitioner claims a direction against the respondents, i.e. Collector of Customs and the International Airports Authority of India, (IAAI) for release of its goods imported from Singapore, for which Bill of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMs.Umang Overseas Vs. the Commissioner of Customs
Chennai
Mar-01-2012
Land Acquisition
Mr.Pradeep Jain, Adv.
PrayerWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to grant provisional release on the goods covered under Shipping Bill No.2302618, 2302619, 2302623...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBIn Sabt Jewellery Llc Dubai (Uae) Vs. Commission of Income-tax and or ...
Delhi
Oct-09-1998
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(26) and 111
1998VIAD(Delhi)628; 76(1998)DLT161
Mr. Pradeep Jain, Adv
ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. The petitioner is a bullion dealer in Dubai and a major exporter of bullion to India. In July, 1998 the petitioner received an order for supply of gold from Shri Ganesh Exports, New...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pooja Batra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Overruled
Delhi
Sep-05-2008
Customs
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Preservation of Smuggling Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(2), 5(1), 7, 7(1) and 11; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(39), 108, 110 and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 39, 82, 83 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 199, 420, 468 and 471; Business Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)
155(2008)DLT6
Pradeep Jain an; A. Samad, Advs
V.K. Shali, J.1. Ms. Pooja Batra, petitioner has filed the present writ petition for quashing the detention order bearing F. No. 673/06/2007-CUS/VIII dated 5th December, 2007 issued by Joint Secretary (Cofeposa), Ministry of Finance, Department of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKnight Exports Vs. Director of Enforcement
Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi
Dec-23-1996
Land Acquisition
Pradeep Jain for the Appellant. Dr. Shamsuddin for the Respondent.
1. These appeals together with dispensation application are directed against Adjudication Order No. 1/Adj/96-DD(KKK)/466-471 dated 31-1-1996 under which a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 has been imposed on the appellant in Appeal No. 94 of 1996 for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Hydraulic Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex., New Delhi
Delhi
May-24-1995
Excise
1996(81)ELT25(Del)
Mr. Pradeep Jain, Adv.
Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the miscellaneous order passed by the CEGAT, New Delhi, dismissing the application filed by the petitioners seeking modification of the order of stay and directing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVision Inc Arun Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export), Mumb ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-28-2010
Land Acquisition
Appellant (Represented by: Dr Prabhat Kumar, Advocate and Shri Pradeep Jain, Advocate). Respondent (Represented by: Mr A.K. Prasad, Jt CDR).
Per: P.G. Chacko 1. These are applications filed by the appellants seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of amounts of duty and penalty. In the case of M/s Vision Inc (Vision for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. S. Gomathy Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Kerala
Apr-03-1996
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(2) and 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1996Ker347
K.R.B. Kaimal, Adv.
P. Shanmugam, J.1. Both the Original Petitions are filed challenging the Government Order (Ext. P2 in O.P. No. 4532/96, and Ext. P3 in O.P. No. 4584/96) amending the prospectus for admission to the Post Graduate Course...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Muniyappa Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Oct-13-1988
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19(1), 19(6) and 162
ILR1989KAR615; 1989(3)KarLJ254
B. Veerabhadrappa and ;M. Shivanna, ;N.K. Patil, Advs. for ;Shivraj Patil, ;G.P. Shivaprakash, ;V. Narayanaswamy and ;K.S. Desai, Advs.
ORDERBopanna, J1. These petitions are disposed of by a common order since certain identical points arise for consideration in all these petitions.2, In Writ Petition No. 9478 of 1988, petitioners who are students and have passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Rashmi Kant Misra Vs. G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-16-1988
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1989All55
R.B. Singhal, Adv.
Ravi S. Dhavan, J. 1. The first impression which this Court get after concluding the hearing of this case, is that the issues raised in the two writ petitions could have been avoided if those responsible...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »