Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: pradeep jain · Page 1 of about 453 results (0.175 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 2007

Narayan International Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-01-2007

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 14(1), 45 155; Contract Act - Sections 161, 162 and 171; Bombay Port Trust Act - Sections 3(5); Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 111; International Airports Authority Act, 1971 - Sections 35; Bankruptcy Act, 1883; Sale of Goods Act, 1983; Limitation Act; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(20); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC235; 2007(148)LC235(Delhi); 2008(221)ELT183(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Jain, Adv

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The Petitioner claims a direction against the respondents, i.e. Collector of Customs and the International Airports Authority of India, (IAAI) for release of its goods imported from Singapore, for which Bill of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2012

Ms.Umang Overseas Vs. the Commissioner of Customs

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-01-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Pradeep Jain, Adv.

PrayerWrit petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to grant provisional release on the goods covered under Shipping Bill No.2302618, 2302619, 2302623...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1998

BIn Sabt Jewellery Llc Dubai (Uae) Vs. Commission of Income-tax and or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-09-1998

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(26) and 111

Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)628; 76(1998)DLT161

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Jain, Adv

ORDERR.C. Lahoti, J.1. The petitioner is a bullion dealer in Dubai and a major exporter of bullion to India. In July, 1998 the petitioner received an order for supply of gold from Shri Ganesh Exports, New...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 05 2008

Pooja Batra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Overruled

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-2008

Subject : Customs

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Preservation of Smuggling Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(2), 5(1), 7, 7(1) and 11; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(39), 108, 110 and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 73; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 39, 82, 83 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 199, 420, 468 and 471; Business Rules - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 155(2008)DLT6

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Jain an; A. Samad, Advs

V.K. Shali, J.1. Ms. Pooja Batra, petitioner has filed the present writ petition for quashing the detention order bearing F. No. 673/06/2007-CUS/VIII dated 5th December, 2007 issued by Joint Secretary (Cofeposa), Ministry of Finance, Department of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1996

Knight Exports Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Dec-23-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Jain for the Appellant. Dr. Shamsuddin for the Respondent.

1. These appeals together with dispensation application are directed against Adjudication Order No. 1/Adj/96-DD(KKK)/466-471 dated 31-1-1996 under which a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000 has been imposed on the appellant in Appeal No. 94 of 1996 for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1995

Indian Hydraulic Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex., New Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-24-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1996(81)ELT25(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pradeep Jain, Adv.

Dr. M.K. Sharma, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the miscellaneous order passed by the CEGAT, New Delhi, dismissing the application filed by the petitioners seeking modification of the order of stay and directing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2010

Vision Inc Arun Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export), Mumb ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Appellant (Represented by: Dr Prabhat Kumar, Advocate and Shri Pradeep Jain, Advocate). Respondent (Represented by: Mr A.K. Prasad, Jt CDR).

Per: P.G. Chacko 1. These are applications filed by the appellants seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of amounts of duty and penalty. In the case of M/s Vision Inc (Vision for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 1996

Dr. S. Gomathy Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-03-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(2) and 226; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR1996Ker347

Advocate for Appellant : K.R.B. Kaimal, Adv.

P. Shanmugam, J.1. Both the Original Petitions are filed challenging the Government Order (Ext. P2 in O.P. No. 4532/96, and Ext. P3 in O.P. No. 4584/96) amending the prospectus for admission to the Post Graduate Course...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1988

M. Muniyappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-13-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 19(1), 19(6) and 162

Reported in : ILR1989KAR615; 1989(3)KarLJ254

Advocate for Appellant : B. Veerabhadrappa and ;M. Shivanna, ;N.K. Patil, Advs. for ;Shivraj Patil, ;G.P. Shivaprakash, ;V. Narayanaswamy and ;K.S. Desai, Advs.

ORDERBopanna, J1. These petitions are disposed of by a common order since certain identical points arise for consideration in all these petitions.2, In Writ Petition No. 9478 of 1988, petitioners who are students and have passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 1988

Dr. Rashmi Kant Misra Vs. G.S.V.M. Medical College, Kanpur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-16-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1989All55

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Singhal, Adv.

Ravi S. Dhavan, J. 1. The first impression which this Court get after concluding the hearing of this case, is that the issues raised in the two writ petitions could have been avoided if those responsible...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial