Advanced Search Results
Smt. Rashmi Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-07-2013
Education
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
1 W.P.No.13296/2012 Smt. Rashmi Gupta versus State of M.P.& ORS.07.08.2013 Shri Prabhakar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmarnath Dwivedi and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-24-2001
CivilConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Madhyamik Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 9(4); Recognition Regulations - Regulation 14(9) and 14(19)
2001(5)MPHT343; 2001(3)MPLJ53
Prabhakar Singh and ;S.K.P. Verma, Advs.
ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions have prayed for issue of a writ of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijay Singh Kshtriya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-01-2013
Education
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
M.Cr.C.No.9628/2012 Vijay Singh Kshatriya versus State of M.P.and others Order 01/08/2013 Shri Prabhakar Singh, counsel for the petitioner. Dr. Anjali Gyanani, Panel Lawyer, for the State. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pushpraj Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Dec-10-2012
Education
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
Pushpraj Singh and others versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 10.12.2012. Shri Prabhakar Singh, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri V.P.Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondents, on advance notice. With the consent of parties, the matter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGop Singh Yadav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-24-2013
Land Acquisition
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
WP 11143.10 Writ Petition No.11143 of 2010 (Gop Singh Yadav v The State of M.P.and two otheRs.24-01-2013 Shri Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Panel lawyer for the respondents/State. Heard. Order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Singh Gaharwar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-26-2013
Education
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
M.Cr.C.No.8864/2013 27.9.2013 Shri Prabhakar Singh, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.N.Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent. Heard on admission as well as on I.A.No.15671/2013, an application for staying the proceedings. The applicant has challenged the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyoti Prakash Shukla Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-31-2003
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Madhyamik Shiksha Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 9(4); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
AIR2004MP100; 2003(3)MPHT317; 2003(4)MPLJ421
Shiv Prabhakar Singh, Adv.
ORDERS.L. Jain, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the order 6-2-2003 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 529/2003, the appellant has filed this Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent. 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak Kumar Bokadia (Basor0 Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-29-2012
Education
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
1 W.P.No.17691/2012 Deepak Kumar Bokadia versus State of M.P.& ORS.29.10.2012 Shri Prabhakar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPadmakar Mishra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-29-2012
Education
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
1 W.P.No.17695/2012 Padmakar Mishra versus State of M.P.& ORS.29.10.2012 Heard Shri Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Kumar Sharma Vs. Vijay Singh Verma
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-26-2013
Miscellaneous
Shri. Prabhakar Singh
Con.C.No.1802/11 26/02/13 Shri Prabhakar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. From the reply filed by the respondents, it is seen that for considering the claim of the petitioner for regularization, a scrutiny committee was constituted. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »