Advanced Search Results

In Re: J.K. Satoh Agricultural Machines Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CompanySICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 18, 20, 20(1), 22, 22A, 23A and 23B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441, 454, 481, 530, 531, 531A, 532, 533, 536, 537, 542, 543 and 545; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 64; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : [2007]138CompCas955(All); (2006)5CompLJ102(All)

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Upadhyay, ;Bharat Ji Agarwal, ;Piyush Agarwal, ;Navin Sinha, ;Vipin Sinha and ;R.P. Agarwal, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. The Company Application No. 2 of 1990 dated 31.1.1990 was registered, on a recommendation made by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under Section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)'Act...

Cit Vs. Devidayal Aluminium Industries

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]141TAXMAN289(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue Piyush Agarwal, for the Assessee

ORDERWe have heard Sri A.N. Mahajan learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Piyush Agarwal learned counsel for the respondents.2. Additional depreciation of Rs. 33,899 on the cost of computer was allowed to the assessee by...

Tola Ram Sons Dal Mill Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]130TAXMAN602(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Piyush Agarwal, for the Assessee Prakash Krishna, for the Revenue.

ORDERAt the instance of the assessee the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court for its opinion :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...

In Re: New India Sugar Mills Limited, an Existing Company WithIn the M ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235, 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 393(1) and 394; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Registration Act, 1908; ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 67

Reported in : [2006]68SCL386(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Piyush Agarwal, Adv.

S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Company Application by summons, as provided under Rule 67 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by Upper Ganges...

Aar Bee Enterprises (Proprietor Aar Bee Containers Pvt. Ltd.) a Compan ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34

Reported in : [2006]133CompCas25(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Ji Agarwal and ;Piyush Agarwal, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned counsel for petitioner. No one appears for the respondents. 2. This creditors winding up petition was filed, after giving notice under Section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956,...

Camphor and Allied Products Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3B, 4B, 4B(2), 4B(6) and 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2005]139STC380(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Bharatji Agrawal, Sr. Adv., ;Piyush Agarwal and ;Amit Jaitly, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. These two writ petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Heard Sri Bharatji Agrawal and Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.3. This...

Dhan Prakash Cane Crusher Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948

Reported in : [2002]128STC654(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Piyush Agarwal, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. The present trade tax revision has been preferred under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (in short called 'the Act') against the order dated February 4, 2002 passed in second...

Rathi Super Steel Limited Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4A and 10

Reported in : [2004]138STC646(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Ji Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;Piyush Agarwal, Adv.

Prakash Krishna, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated February 19, 2003 passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Lucknow, in Appeal No. 133 of 2002. The short controversy involved in the present revision is...

Agilent Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Trade Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Uttar Prdesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3(A)

Reported in : [2004]138STC693(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Ji Agrawal, ;Piyush Agarwal and ;Mukul Gupta, Advs.

Prakash Krishna, J.1. The question involved in the present revision is whether the ECG machines, defibrillators, colour doppler systems, patient monitoring equipments, hand held multimeter, RF network analyzer, communication performance analyzer, spectrum analyzer, mini OTDR are...

Indian Steel Works Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [2006]146STC285(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Piyush Agarwal, Standing Counsel

Rajes Kumar, J.1. These are two S.T.R. Nos. 1705 of 1990 and 1706 of 1990 filed by the assessee against the order of Tribunal, Saharanpur Bench, dated October 11, 1995, by which, two applications for recalling...