Advanced Search Results
In Re: J.K. Satoh Agricultural Machines Ltd.
Allahabad
Nov-30-2005
CompanySICA
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 15, 15(1), 16, 17, 18, 20, 20(1), 22, 22A, 23A and 23B; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 441, 454, 481, 530, 531, 531A, 532, 533, 536, 537, 542, 543 and 545; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 64; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) (Amendment) Act, 1993
[2007]138CompCas955(All); (2006)5CompLJ102(All)
V.B. Upadhyay, ;Bharat Ji Agarwal, ;Piyush Agarwal, ;Navin Sinha, ;Vipin Sinha and ;R.P. Agarwal, Advs.
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. The Company Application No. 2 of 1990 dated 31.1.1990 was registered, on a recommendation made by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) under Section 20(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)'Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Devidayal Aluminium Industries
Allahabad
Feb-09-2004
Direct Taxation
[2004]141TAXMAN289(All)
A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue Piyush Agarwal, for the Assessee
ORDERWe have heard Sri A.N. Mahajan learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Piyush Agarwal learned counsel for the respondents.2. Additional depreciation of Rs. 33,899 on the cost of computer was allowed to the assessee by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTola Ram Sons Dal Mill Vs. Cit
Allahabad
Oct-24-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN602(All)
Piyush Agarwal, for the Assessee Prakash Krishna, for the Revenue.
ORDERAt the instance of the assessee the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this court for its opinion :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kashi Ornament House Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax
Allahabad
Aug-07-2008
Sales Tax/ Vat
(2010)28VST71(All)
Shri. Piyush Agarwal, Shri. Piyush Agrawal
Prakash Krishna, J. 1. In these four revisions, common questions of law and facts are involved. The assessment years involved are 1977-78, 1978-79, 1979-80 and 1980-81.2. The applicant is carrying on the business of gold, jewellery,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHiran Tobacco Factory Vs. Cegat and anr.
Allahabad
Apr-26-1999
Excise
1999(84)LC833(Allahabad)
Sri. Piyush Agarwal
M.C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenged an order dated 23.3.1998 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeal No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCamphor and Allied Products Ltd. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Jan-29-2004
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3B, 4B, 4B(2), 4B(6) and 9; Constitution of India - Article 226
[2005]139STC380(All)
Bharatji Agrawal, Sr. Adv., ;Piyush Agarwal and ;Amit Jaitly, Advs.
M. Katju, J.1. These two writ petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Heard Sri Bharatji Agrawal and Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.3. This...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: New India Sugar Mills Limited, an Existing Company WithIn the M ...
Allahabad
Aug-08-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235, 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 393(1) and 394; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Registration Act, 1908; ;Indian Stamp Act, 1899; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 67
[2006]68SCL386(All)
Piyush Agarwal, Adv.
S.P. Mehrotra, J.1. The present Company Application by summons, as provided under Rule 67 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by Upper Ganges...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhan Prakash Cane Crusher Vs. Commissioner of Trade Tax
Allahabad
Apr-19-2002
Sales Tax
Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Rules, 1948
[2002]128STC654(All)
Piyush Agarwal, Adv.
R.B. Misra, J.1. The present trade tax revision has been preferred under Section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (in short called 'the Act') against the order dated February 4, 2002 passed in second...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Steel Works Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax
Allahabad
Jan-07-2003
Sales Tax
[2006]146STC285(All)
Piyush Agarwal, Standing Counsel
Rajes Kumar, J.1. These are two S.T.R. Nos. 1705 of 1990 and 1706 of 1990 filed by the assessee against the order of Tribunal, Saharanpur Bench, dated October 11, 1995, by which, two applications for recalling...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhandelwal Cements Limited Vs. Cegat and Cce
Allahabad
Apr-29-2002
Excise
2002(84)ECC312
Sri. Piyush Agarwal
ORDERR.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Bharatji Agarwal alongwith Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K. Singh, Standing Counsel for the respondent. By the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »