Advanced Search Results

Statesman (Private) Limited Vs. Deb (H.R.) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)ILLJ733Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner, the Statesman (Private) Ltd. (hereinafter called the company) carries on business as printers and publishers of the well-known daily newspaper, the Statesman.2. The petitioner-company dismissed Sk. Kallu, one of its workmen,...

Workmen of Containers and Closures, Ltd. Vs. First Labour Court and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)ILLJ471Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. One Jhakkar Prosad was a workman employed by the opposite party 4 company. He was charged with miconduct, specified under Rule 18(a), (g) and (q) of the standing orders of the opposite party...

Workmen of Ottis Elevator (India) (Private) Ltd. Vs. Fourth Industrial ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1963)IILLJ147Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioners, who were originally in the employment of Balmer Lawrie & Co., Ltd., in its managing agency department for Waygood Ottis, Ltd., London (installers of elevators and escalators), joined service under respondent...

Hooghly Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Fifth Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1963)IILLJ172Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. The petitioner-company, known as Hoogly Mills Company, Ltd., moves against an award by the fifth industrial tribunal, holding that the action of the petitioner-company in stopping compensation for idle loom hours was unjustified...

Workmen of Continental Commercial Company (Private), Ltd. Vs. Governme ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1962)ILLJ85Cal

B.N. Banerjee, J.1. As between respondent 3, Continental Commercial Company (Private), Limited, (hereinafter referred to as the 'company') and their workmen (the petitioners herein), there had been a settlement arrived at in course of a conciliation...

Angus Co. Ltd. Vs. Chouthi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workman's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 6, 17, 19, 22 and 32

Reported in : AIR1955Cal616,60CWN174

Advocate for Appellant : Phanindra Kumar Sanyal, Adv.

Chakravartti, C.J.1. Of the two grounds urged in this appeal, one is really a ground of fact, but the other raises what appears to be a question of first impression. It is this: Does the Workmen's...

National Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Monorama Dassi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1953Cal143,56CWN523,(1952)ILLJ361Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Phanindra Kumar Sanyal, Adv.

Harries, C.J. 1. This is an appeal from an order of the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation awarding the applicant respondent a sum of Rs. 1200/- as compensation together with certain costs.2. The applicant was the...

Sisir Kumar Laha Vs. J.N. Majumdar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1955Cal309

Advocate for Appellant : Phanindra Kumar Sanyal, Adv.

ORDERSinha, J. 1. The petitioner is an employee of the opposite party No. 17, The Bank of India Limited. What had happened is this: The Bank had certain disputes with its workmen and the result was...

Ramanlal Madanlal Vs. Sm. Binapani Debi

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2(1) and 22(2); ;Workmen's Compensation Rules, 1924 - Rules 19 and 41

Reported in : AIR1963Cal479

Advocate for Appellant : Phanindra Kumar Sanyal, Adv.

P.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act. The claimant is the mother of the deceased workman. He died from personal injuries received in an accident arising out of and in the...

Tarakdas Dutta Vs. Sarat Chandra

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act, 1950 - Section 18(1)

Reported in : AIR1953Cal335,56CWN296

Advocate for Appellant : Phanindra Kumar Sanyal, Adv.

ORDER1. This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff in a proceeding for recovery of possession under Section 41, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act against the order of the Registrar of the Small Cause Court by which...